| Literature DB >> 35690847 |
Jacob S Heng1,2,3, J Fernando Arevalo3, James T Handa4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual acuity after cataract surgery in eyes with Macular Telangiectasia (MacTel) Type 2.Entities:
Keywords: Cataract surgery; Ellipsoid zone; Macular Telangiectasia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35690847 PMCID: PMC9188048 DOI: 10.1186/s40942-022-00386-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous ISSN: 2056-9920
Fig. 1A Scatterplot showing best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after cataract surgery. Pre-operative Snellen BCVA is plotted on the x-axis and post-operative Snellen BCVA is plotted on the y-axis. The diagonal line intersecting the origin represents no change in BCVA. Values above the diagonal line represent an increase in visual acuity and vice versa. B Dot and box plots showing post-op gain in ETDRS letters according to (left) nuclear sclerosis grade, (center) absence or presence of central foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) break, and (right) MacTel disease stage
Gain in ETDRS letters according to patient and ocular characteristics
| Characteristic | No. of eyes | Gain in ETDRS letters after cataract surgery | Interquartile range | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient characteristics | ||||
| Age (years) | ||||
| ≤ 69 years | 11 | 15.0 | 10.0–20.5 | 0.00275** |
| > 69 years | 9 | 4.00 | 2.00–13.00 | |
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 19 | 10.0 | 2.0–20.0 | < 0.001** |
| Male | 1 | 25.0 | – | |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| White or Caucasian | 18 | 10.5 | 2.5–20.0 | 0.007** |
| Asian | 2 | 17.0 | – | |
| Hypertension | ||||
| Absent | 4 | 12.5 | 8.75–16.25 | 0.804 |
| Present | 16 | 10.5 | 2.0–21.0 | |
| Diabetes mellitus | ||||
| Absent | 11 | 5.0 | 1.0–20.5 | 0.416 |
| Present | 9 | 13.0 | 10.0–20.0 | |
| Ocular characteristics | ||||
| Pre-op BCVA (ETDRS letters) | ||||
| > 57 ETDRS letters | 10 | 5.0 | 2.5–10.8 | 0.361 |
| ≤ 57 ETDRS letters | 10 | 20.0 | 11.2–21.0 | |
| MacTel Disease Stage | ||||
| Stage 3 | 3 | 20.0 | 12.5–23.0 | 0.840 |
| Stage 4 | 15 | 10.0 | 2.0–17.0 | |
| Stage 5 | 2 | 17.5 | – | |
| OCT findings | ||||
| Central foveal EZ break | ||||
| Absent | 7 | 10.0 | 4.5–18.5 | 0.945 |
| Present | 13 | 11.0 | 2.0–20.0 | |
| Pre-op central subfield thickness (μm) | ||||
| ≤ 216 μm | 10 | 15.0 | 2.5–20.8 | 0.950 |
| > 216 μm | 10 | 10.5 | 5.0–14.5 | |
| Cataract grading | ||||
| Nuclear sclerosis | ||||
| Grade 1 | 1 | 5.0 | – | 0.00177** |
| Grade 2 | 13 | 5.0 | 2.0–13.0 | |
| Grade 3 | 6 | 22.5 | 20.2–24.8 | |
| Cortical cataract | ||||
| Grade 0 | 10 | 17.5 | 6.25–20.75 | 0.057 |
| Grade 1 | 2 | 13.0 | – | |
| Grade 2 | 3 | 10.0 | 5.0–17.0 | |
| Grade 3 | 5 | 2.0 | 2.0–11.0 | |
| PSC | ||||
| Grade 0 | 15 | 13.0 | 4.5–20.5 | 0.500 |
| Grade 1 | 3 | 0.0 | −1.0–5.0 | |
| Grade 2 | 2 | 13 | – | |
P value of univariate generalized linear model with generalized estimating equation for each variable is shown
Age, pre-op BCVA and pre-op central subfield thickness were analyzed as continuous variables but categorized into above and below median values for display in this table
*p-value of < 0.05
**p-value of < 0.01
Patient and ocular characteristics of eyes achieving post-op BCVA of better than 20/40 or 20/40 or worse
| Characteristic | All | Post-op BCVA > 20/40 | Post-op BCVA ≤ 20/40 | Odds ratio [95% CI] | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient characteristics | |||||
| Age (years) [IQR] | 69.0 [63.8–78.0] | 69.0 [62.0–72.0] | 69.0 [65.0–78.0] | 0.96 [0.83, 1.11] | 0.568 |
| Sex (eyes) | |||||
| Female | 19 | 8 | 11 | – | 1.00 |
| Male | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Ethnicity (eyes) | |||||
| White or Caucasian | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0.80 [0.29, 2.23] | 0.669 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Hypertension (eyes) | |||||
| Absent | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.20 [0.03, 1.67] | 0.136 |
| Present | 16 | 6 | 10 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus (eyes) | |||||
| Absent | 11 | 4 | 7 | 2.19 [0.38, 12.62] | 0.381 |
| Present | 9 | 5 | 4 | ||
| Ocular characteristics | |||||
| Pre-op BCVA [IQR] (ETDRS letters) | 57.0 [47.5–63.2] | 61.0 [55.0–76.0] | 50.0 [20.0–59.5] | 1.12 [1.02, 1.23] | 0.0131* |
| MacTel Disease Stage (eyes) | |||||
| Stage 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1.45 [0.40, 5.29] | 0.573 |
| Stage 4 | 15 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Stage 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| OCT findings | |||||
| Central foveal EZ break (eyes) | |||||
| Absent | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5.62 × 10–10 [2.89 × 10–10, 1.09 × 10–9] | < 0.001** |
| Present | 13 | 2 | 11 | ||
| Pre-op central subfield thickness [IQR] (μm) | 216 [190–256] | 212 [167–233] | 221 [194–278] | 0.99 [0.97, 1.01] | 0.308 |
| Cataract grading | |||||
| Nuclear sclerosis (eyes) | |||||
| Grade 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.71 [0.51, 5.68] | 0.383 |
| Grade 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | ||
| Grade 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Cortical cataract (eyes) | |||||
| Grade 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0.74 [0.32, 1.74] | 0.491 |
| Grade 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Grade 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Grade 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | ||
| PSC (eyes) | |||||
| Grade 0 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0.93 [0.19, 4.55] | 0.930 |
| Grade 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Grade 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
Odds ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value of logistic regression with generalized estimating equations for each variable are shown
* denotes a p-value of < 0.05
** denotes a p-value of < 0.01
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curves of vision loss of 2 lines or more (10 or more ETDRS letters) in eyes with MacTel Type 2 after cataract surgery. A Kaplan–Meier curve of all eyes. B Kaplan–Meier curves of eyes with no central foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) break (solid black line) and eyes with central foveal EZ break (dashed grey line). C Kaplan–Meier curves of eyes with MacTel Stage 3 (solid black line), Stage 4 (solid grey line) and Stage 5 (dashed grey line). p-values for univariate Cox regression are shown