Literature DB >> 35690640

Does surgery improve neurological outcomes in older individuals with cervical spinal cord injury without bone injury? A multicenter study.

Satoshi Nori1, Kota Watanabe2, Kazuki Takeda1,3, Junichi Yamane1,4, Hitoshi Kono1,5, Noriaki Yokogawa6, Takeshi Sasagawa6,7, Kei Ando8, Hiroaki Nakashima8, Naoki Segi8, Toru Funayama9, Fumihiko Eto10, Akihiro Yamaji11, Takeo Furuya12, Atsushi Yunde12, Hideaki Nakajima13, Tomohiro Yamada14,15, Tomohiko Hasegawa14, Yoshinori Terashima16,17, Ryosuke Hirota16, Hidenori Suzuki18, Yasuaki Imajo18, Shota Ikegami19, Masashi Uehara19, Hitoshi Tonomura20, Munehiro Sakata20,21, Ko Hashimoto22, Yoshito Onoda22, Kenichi Kawaguchi23, Yohei Haruta23, Nobuyuki Suzuki24, Kenji Kato24, Hiroshi Uei25,26, Hirokatsu Sawada26, Kazuo Nakanishi27, Kosuke Misaki27, Hidetomi Terai28, Koji Tamai28, Eiki Shirasawa29, Gen Inoue29, Katsuhito Kiyasu30, Yoichi Iizuka31, Eiji Takasawa31, Haruki Funao32,33,34, Takashi Kaito35, Toshitaka Yoshii36, Masayuki Ishihara37, Seiji Okada35, Shiro Imagama8, Satoshi Kato6.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the neurological outcomes of older individuals treated with surgery versus conservative treatment for cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without bone injury.
SETTING: Thirty-three medical institutions in Japan.
METHODS: This study included 317 consecutive persons aged ≥65 years with CSCI without bone injury in participating institutes between 2010 and 2020. The participants were followed up for at least 6 months after the injury. Individuals were divided into surgery (n = 114) and conservative treatment (n = 203) groups. To compare neurological outcomes and complications between the groups, propensity score matching of the baseline factors (characteristics, comorbidities, and neurological function) was performed.
RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the surgery and conservative treatment groups comprised 89 individuals each. Surgery was performed at a median of 9.0 (3-17) days after CSCI. Baseline factors were comparable between groups, and the standardized difference in the covariates in the matched cohort was <10%. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade and ASIA motor score (AMS) 6 months after injury and changes in the AMS from baseline to 6 months after injury were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.63, P = 0.24, and P = 0.75, respectively). Few participants who underwent surgery demonstrated perioperative complications such as dural tear (1.1%), surgical site infection (2.2%), and C5 palsy (5.6%).
CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is suggested to be a more favorable option for older individuals with CSCI without bone injuries, but this finding requires further validation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35690640     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-022-00818-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.473


  2 in total

1.  Immediate spinal cord decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: feasibility and outcome.

Authors:  Stephen M Papadopoulos; Nathan R Selden; Douglas J Quint; Nayna Patel; Brenda Gillespie; Susan Grube
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-02

Review 2.  Operative and nonoperative management of spinal cord injury. A review.

Authors:  W H Donovan
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1994-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.