| Literature DB >> 35689131 |
Setor K Kunutsor1,2,3,4, Sae Young Jae5, Jari A Laukkanen6,7,8.
Abstract
Serum zinc has been implicated as an important mediator of haemostasis and thrombosis. However, the nature and magnitude of any potential relationship between serum zinc and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the prospective association between serum zinc and VTE risk. We analyzed data involving 2472 men aged 42-61 years without a history of VTE in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease population-based cohort study, with the assessment of serum zinc concentrations using atomic absorption spectrometry. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for incident VTE were estimated. A total of 166 VTE cases occurred during a median follow-up of 27.1 years. The risk of VTE per 1 standard deviation increase in serum zinc in analysis adjusted for systolic blood pressure, body mass index, total cholesterol, triglycerides, smoking status, histories of type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease, medication for dyslipidaemia, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and socioeconomic status was (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.86-1.22), which remained similar (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.87-1.23) following further adjustment for inflammation and history of cancer. Comparing the extreme tertiles of serum zinc, the corresponding adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 0.92 (0.63-1.36) and 0.94 (0.64-1.39), respectively. Imputed results based on 2682 participants and 176 VTE events were consistent with the observed results. In middle-aged and older Finnish men, serum zinc is not associated with future VTE risk. Other large-scale prospective studies conducted in other populations are needed to confirm or refute these findings.Entities:
Keywords: Cohort study; Risk factor; Serum zinc; Venous thromboembolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35689131 PMCID: PMC9314286 DOI: 10.1007/s10534-022-00402-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometals ISSN: 0966-0844 Impact factor: 3.378
Baseline participant characteristics
| Overall (N = 2472) | No VTE (N = 2306) | Developed VTE (N = 166) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum zinc (mg/l) | 0.94 (0.12) | 0.94 (0.12) | 0.94 (0.13) |
| Age at survey (years) | 53 (5) | 53 (5) | 54 (4) |
| Alcohol consumption (g/week) | 31.5 (6.2–90.8) | 32.0 (6.3–91.0) | 29.7 (5.4–88.4) |
| Socioeconomic status | 8.50 (4.23) | 8.49 (4.22) | 8.52 (4.28) |
| Physical activity (kj/day) | 1192 (623–1991) | 1189 (630–1992) | 1245 (586–1908) |
| History of type 2 diabetes (%) | 99 (4.0) | 94 (4.1) | 5 (3.0) |
| Current smoking (%) | 775 (31.4) | 746 (32.4) | 29 (17.5) |
| History of CHD (%) | 617 (25.0) | 582 (25.2) | 35 (21.1) |
| Medication for dyslipidemia (%) | 15 (0.6) | 14 (0.6) | 1 (0.6) |
| History of cancer (%) | 42 (1.7) | 37 (1.6) | 5 (3.0) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.9 (3.6) | 26.9 (3.6) | 27.2 (3.6) |
| SBP (mmHg) | 134 (17) | 134 (17) | 132 (16) |
| DBP (mmHg) | 89 (11) | 89 (11) | 89 (9) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 5.91 (1.08) | 5.91 (1.08) | 5.91 (1.16) |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.29 (0.30) | 1.29 (0.30) | 1.30 (0.30) |
| Serum magnesium (mg/dl) | 1.98 (0.16) | 1.98 (0.15) | 2.00 (0.17) |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.11 (0.81–1.58) | 1.11 (0.81–1.58) | 1.19 (0.82–1.60) |
| High-sensitivity CRP (mg/l) | 1.28 (0.71–2.44) | 1.28 (0.71–1.58) | 1.26 (0.67–2.38) |
| Total energy intake (kJ/day) | 9843 (2582) | 9841 (2566) | 9875 (2802) |
| Processed and unprocessed red meat (g/day) | 144 (78) | 144 (78) | 144 (71) |
| Fruits, berries and vegetables (g/day) | 251 (157) | 251 (158) | 255 (141) |
BMI body mass index, CHD coronary heart disease, CI confidence interval, CRP C-reactive protein, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation, SBP systolic blood pressure
Association between serum zinc and risk of venous thromboembolism
| Zinc (mg/l) | Events/total | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||||||
| Per 1 SD increase | 166/2,472 | 1.05 (0.89–1.24) | .55 | 1.03 (0.86–1.22) | .77 | 1.04 (0.87–1.23) | .68 | 1.01 (0.86–1.19) | .90 |
| T1 (0.50–0.89) | 59/904 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||
| T2 (0.90–0.98) | 56/792 | 1.01 (0.70–1.46) | .96 | 0.95 (0.66–1.38) | .80 | 0.97 (0.67–1.41) | .87 | 0.95 (0.66–1.37) | .79 |
| T3 (0.99–1.62) | 51/776 | 0.99 (0.68–1.45) | .98 | 0.92 (0.63–1.36) | .69 | 0.94 (0.64–1.39) | .76 | 0.90 (0.62–1.32) | .60 |
CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, ref reference, SD standard deviation, T tertile
Model 1: Adjusted for age
Model 2: Model 1 plus systolic blood pressure, body mass index, total cholesterol, triglycerides, smoking status, history of type 2 diabetes, history of coronary heart disease, medication for dyslipidaemia, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and socioeconomic status
Model 3: Model 2 plus high sensitivity C-reactive protein and history of cancer
Model 4: Serum magnesium, total energy intake, intake of processed and unprocessed red meat, and intake of fruits, berries and vegetables