| Literature DB >> 35688967 |
Rodrigo Tomazetto de Carvalho1, Gustavo Miranda Rocha2, Claudia Santiago Karez1, Ricardo da Gama Bahia1, Renato Crespo Pereira1, Alex Cardoso Bastos3, Leonardo Tavares Salgado4.
Abstract
Coralline algae constitute one of the main groups of highly vulnerable calcified benthic organisms to ocean acidification. Although damaging effects of seawater acidification on the coralline algae skeleton have been widely demonstrated, the susceptibility to dissolution varies according to the Mg2+ in the calcite lattice. Even though the Southwest Atlantic Ocean exhibits the world's largest rhodolith beds, which occupies 20,902 km2, there is no information regarding the coralline algae species mineralogy in this area. Here, we provide mineralogical data of twenty-four coralline algae species, examine the similarity in taxonomic groups, spatial occurrence and the vulnerability of these algae to seawater acidification. Mineralogy revealed that coralline algae skeletons were mainly composed of high-Mg calcite (> 70%) with minor presence of aragonite (< 30%) and dolomite (< 3%). There were no similarities between the skeletal mineralogy of taxonomic groups and sampling regions. Remarkably, the mean Mg-substitution of encrusting coralline algae from the Brazilian Shelf was 46.3% higher than global average. Because of the higher mean Mg-substitution in calcite compared with worldwide coralline algae, these algae from Southwest Atlantic Ocean would be highly susceptible to dissolution caused by the expected near-future ocean acidification and will compromise CaCO3 net production across the Brazilian Shelf.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35688967 PMCID: PMC9187768 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13731-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Mineralogy (mean percentage ± standard deviation) of coralline algae species collected in several sites along the Brazilian shelf.
| Species | Family | Site | % Mg calcite | % aragonite | % dolomite | % Mg in calcite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 99.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0 | 16.7 ± 0.4 | |
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 98.3 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 0 | 16.9 ± 0.5 | |
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 97.6 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 0 | 18.7 ± 0.2 | |
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 98.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0 | 21.3 ± 0.3 | |
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 97.8 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 0 | 15.6 ± 0.2 | |
| Corallinaceae | Saint Peter & Saint Paul Island | 87.5 ± 0.5 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 32.5 ± 0.7 | |
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 98.7 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0 | 17.6 ± 0.3 | |
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 99.7 ± 0.5 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0 | 15.9 ± 0.4 | |
| Corallinaceae | Espírito Santo | 99.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0,2 | 0 | 18.1 ± 0.3 | |
| Corallinaceae | Santa Catarina | 95.7 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 16.4 ± 0.4 | |
| Corallinaceae | Rio de Janeiro | 97.9 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 0 | 25.2 ± 0.2 | |
| Corallinaceae | Bahia | 98.6 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 15.8 ± 0.5 | |
| Corallinaceae | Santa Catarina | 98.4 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 13.8 ± 0.4 | |
| Corallinaceae | Bahia | 96.8 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 17.8 ± 0.6 | |
| Corallinaceae | Bahia | 99.3 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0 | 25.7 ± 0.4 | |
| Corallinaceae | Bahia | 90.4 ± 0.3 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 25.7 ± 0.5 | |
| Corallinaceae | Bahia | 92.5 ± 0.5 | 7.1 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 24.2 ± 0.3 | |
| Hapalidiaceae | ES/BA/AM/Trindade Island | 82.3 ± 4.1 | 16.9 ± 4.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 18.9 ± 2.6 | |
| Hapalidiaceae | Bahia | 89.7 ± 0.4 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 0 | 14.5 ± 0.6 | |
| Hapalidiaceae | BA/ES | 94.8 ± 0.9 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 21.6 ± 0.8 | |
| Sporolithaceae | Bahia | 95.5 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 0 | 19.9 ± 0.5 | |
| Sporolithaceae | Fernando de Noronha Island | 97.8 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 24.5 ± 0.3 | |
| Sporolithaceae | Rio de Janeiro | 81.7 ± 0.7 | 18.3 ± 0.2 | 0 | 23.8 ± 0.5 | |
| Sporolithaceae | Bahia | 69.8 ± 0.4 | 30.2 ± 0.4 | 0 | 28.9 ± 0.9 |
BA Bahia State, ES Espírito Santo State, AM Amazonas State.
Mineralogy (mean ± standard deviation) of coralline algae families Corallinaceae, Hapalidiaceae and Sporolithaceae.
| Family | Corallinaceae | Hapalidiaceae | Sporolithaceae |
|---|---|---|---|
| % high Mg-calcite | 96.7 ± 3.4A | 88.9 ± 3.6AB | 86.2 ± 6.5B |
| % Aragonite | 2.7 ± 1.5A | 10.5 ± 1.4B | 13.4 ± 3.5B |
| % Dolomite | 0.6 ± 0.6A | 0.6 ± 0.2A | 0.4 ± 0.4A |
| % Mg in calcite | 19.9 ± 3.5A | 18.57 ± 4.7A | 24.28 ± 1.9A |
Different letters are used to indicate statistically differences (p < 0.05) of percentage of CaCO3 polymorphs obtained through post-hoc Dunn’s test after the Kruskal–Wallis analysis.
Figure 1Bright field optical microscopy of the three samples from the three different families of the order Corallinales (Corallinaceae (A); Hapalidiaceae (B); and Sporolithaceae (C)). Bright field image overlaid Raman mapping indicates the same pattern from the three samples, with high-Mg calcite in the internal cell walls and aragonite as a “shell” close to the cell membrane (green: high-Mg calcite; red: aragonite). Scale bars: 20 µm.
Figure 2Map of world distribution of % Mg in calcite in coralline algae from four regions (North Atlantic Ocean, Indo-Pacific Ocean, Adriatic/Mediterrean Sea, Caribbean and Southwest Atlantic Ocean; upper left in the figure) ranging from 4 to 33% Mg in calcite; a detailed map of % Mg in calcite in coralline algae species analyzed in this study along the Brazilian shelf (upper righ in the figure); mean % Mg in calcite in coralline algae and standard deviation in several regions of world. Different letters are used to indicate statistically differences (p < 0.05) obtained through post-hoc Dunn’s test after the Kruskal–Wallis analysis (bellow in the figure). Both maps maps were obtained from ESRI database (https://services.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/services/Canvas/World_Dark_Gray_Base/MapServer) and the coordinates from the mineralogy analysis were standardized using EPSG: 3857-WGS 84/Pseudo-Mercator. Maps were produced with QGIS v3.4 (https://www.qgis.org).
Figure 3Low magnification view of coralline algae thallus with the selected area for Raman analysis marked (white square) (A; scale bar: 200 µm). Optical microscopy image of coralline algae cells with numbers 1 and 2 representing the punctual Raman analysis of the cell (B; scale bar: 20 µm) and their respective Raman spectra with a black arrow indicating the peaks that were used to differentiate high-Mg calcite (C; black arrow indicates the 281 cm−1 calcite peak) from aragonite (2; black arrow indicates the 208 cm−1 aragonite peak). Optical microscopy image overlaid by Raman mapping shows the prevalence of high-Mg calcite (green) in the internal cell wall and aragonite (red) as a “shell” in the inner part of the cell (D).