Z Paskins1,2, O Babatunde3, A Sturrock4, L S Toh5, R Horne6, I Maidment7. 1. School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK. z.paskins@keele.ac.uk. 2. Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK. z.paskins@keele.ac.uk. 3. School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK. 4. Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 5. Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 6. Centre for Behavioural Medicine, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK. 7. Clinical Pharmacy, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
Systematic reviews that examine effectiveness of interventions to improve medicines optimisation do not explain how or why they work. This realist review identified that interventions which effectively optimise medicines use in osteoporosis include opportunities to address patients' perceptions of illness and treatment and/or support primary care clinician decision making. INTRODUCTION: In people with osteoporosis, adherence to medicines is poorer than other diseases and patients report follow-up is lacking, and multiple unmet information needs. We conducted a rapid realist review to understand what contextual conditions and mechanisms enable interventions to support osteoporosis medication optimisation. METHODS: A primary search identified observational or interventional studies which aimed to improve medicines adherence or optimisation; a supplementary second search identified research of any design to gain additional insights on emerging findings. Extracted data was interrogated for patterns of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, further discussed in team meetings, informed by background literature and the Practicalities and Perception Approach as an underpinning conceptual framework. RESULTS: We identified 5 contextual timepoints for the person with osteoporosis (identifying a problem; starting medicine; continuing medicine) and the practitioner and healthcare system (making a diagnosis and giving a treatment recommendation; reviewing medicine). Interventions which support patient-informed decision making appear to influence long-term commitment to treatment. Supporting patients' practical ability to adhere (e.g. by lowering treatment burden and issuing reminders) only appears to be helpful, when combined with other approaches to address patient beliefs and concerns. However, few studies explicitly addressed patients' perceptions of illness and treatment. Supporting primary care clinician decision making and integration of primary and secondary care services also appears to be important, in improving rates of treatment initiation and adherence. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a need for further research to identify a sustainable, integrated, patient-centred, and cost- and clinically effective model of long-term care for people with osteoporosis.
Systematic reviews that examine effectiveness of interventions to improve medicines optimisation do not explain how or why they work. This realist review identified that interventions which effectively optimise medicines use in osteoporosis include opportunities to address patients' perceptions of illness and treatment and/or support primary care clinician decision making. INTRODUCTION: In people with osteoporosis, adherence to medicines is poorer than other diseases and patients report follow-up is lacking, and multiple unmet information needs. We conducted a rapid realist review to understand what contextual conditions and mechanisms enable interventions to support osteoporosis medication optimisation. METHODS: A primary search identified observational or interventional studies which aimed to improve medicines adherence or optimisation; a supplementary second search identified research of any design to gain additional insights on emerging findings. Extracted data was interrogated for patterns of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, further discussed in team meetings, informed by background literature and the Practicalities and Perception Approach as an underpinning conceptual framework. RESULTS: We identified 5 contextual timepoints for the person with osteoporosis (identifying a problem; starting medicine; continuing medicine) and the practitioner and healthcare system (making a diagnosis and giving a treatment recommendation; reviewing medicine). Interventions which support patient-informed decision making appear to influence long-term commitment to treatment. Supporting patients' practical ability to adhere (e.g. by lowering treatment burden and issuing reminders) only appears to be helpful, when combined with other approaches to address patient beliefs and concerns. However, few studies explicitly addressed patients' perceptions of illness and treatment. Supporting primary care clinician decision making and integration of primary and secondary care services also appears to be important, in improving rates of treatment initiation and adherence. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a need for further research to identify a sustainable, integrated, patient-centred, and cost- and clinically effective model of long-term care for people with osteoporosis.
Authors: Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: T Gleeson; M D Iversen; J Avorn; A M Brookhart; J N Katz; E Losina; F May; A R Patrick; W H Shrank; D H Solomon Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-06-05 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: F Borgström; I Lekander; M Ivergård; O Ström; A Svedbom; V Alekna; M L Bianchi; P Clark; M D Curiel; H P Dimai; M Jürisson; R Kallikorm; O Lesnyak; E McCloskey; E Nassonov; K M Sanders; S Silverman; M Tamulaitiene; T Thomas; A N A Tosteson; B Jönsson; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Dorcas E Beaton; Muhammad Mamdani; Hong Zheng; Susan Jaglal; Suzanne M Cadarette; Earl R Bogoch; Joanna E M Sale; Rebeka Sujic; Ravi Jain Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 1.817