Literature DB >> 35688454

Artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography images for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses.

Takamichi Kuwahara1, Kazuo Hara1, Nobumasa Mizuno1, Shin Haba1, Nozomi Okuno1, Yasuhiro Kuraishi1, Daiki Fumihara1, Takafumi Yanaidani1, Sho Ishikawa1, Tsukasa Yasuda1, Masanori Yamada1, Sachiyo Onishi2, Keisaku Yamada2, Tsutomu Tanaka2, Masahiro Tajika2, Yasumasa Niwa2, Rui Yamaguchi3,4, Yasuhiro Shimizu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND : There are several types of pancreatic mass, so it is important to distinguish between them before treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a mathematical technique that automates learning and recognition of data patterns. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of our AI model using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) images of multiple types of pancreatic mass (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC], pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma [PASC], acinar cell carcinoma [ACC], metastatic pancreatic tumor [MPT], neuroendocrine carcinoma [NEC], neuroendocrine tumor [NET], solid pseudopapillary neoplasm [SPN], chronic pancreatitis, and autoimmune pancreatitis [AIP]). METHODS : Patients who underwent EUS were included in this retrospective study. The included patients were divided into training, validation, and test cohorts. Using these cohorts, an AI model that can distinguish pancreatic carcinomas from noncarcinomatous pancreatic lesions was developed using a deep-learning architecture and the diagnostic performance of the AI model was evaluated. RESULTS : 22 000 images were generated from 933 patients. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (95 %CI) of the AI model for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinomas in the test cohort were 0.90 (0.84-0.97), 0.94 (0.88-0.98), 0.82 (0.68-0.92), and 0.91 (0.85-0.95), respectively. The per-category sensitivities (95 %CI) of each disease were PDAC 0.96 (0.90-0.99), PASC 1.00 (0.05-1.00), ACC 1.00 (0.22-1.00), MPT 0.33 (0.01-0.91), NEC 1.00 (0.22-1.00), NET 0.93 (0.66-1.00), SPN 1.00 (0.22-1.00), chronic pancreatitis 0.78 (0.52-0.94), and AIP 0.73 (0.39-0.94). CONCLUSIONS : Our developed AI model can distinguish pancreatic carcinomas from noncarcinomatous pancreatic lesions, but external validation is needed. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35688454     DOI: 10.1055/a-1873-7920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   9.776


  1 in total

1.  Deep learning as a novel method for endoscopic diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis: a prospective nested case-control study.

Authors:  Quchuan Zhao; Qing Jia; Tianyu Chi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.