Literature DB >> 35688423

Charge Configuration Memory Devices: Energy Efficiency and Switching Speed.

Anze Mraz1,2, Rok Venturini1,3, Damjan Svetin1,4, Vitomir Sever1, Ian Aleksander Mihailovic1, Igor Vaskivskyi1, Bojan Ambrozic4, Goran Dražić5,6, Maria D'Antuono7,8, Daniela Stornaiuolo7,8, Francesco Tafuri7,9, Dimitrios Kazazis10, Jan Ravnik10, Yasin Ekinci10, Dragan Mihailovic1,4,3,5.   

Abstract

Current trends in data processing have given impetus for an intense search of new concepts of memory devices with emphasis on efficiency, speed, and scalability. A promising new approach to memory storage is based on resistance switching between charge-ordered domain states in the layered dichalcogenide 1T-TaS2. Here we investigate the energy efficiency scaling of such charge configuration memory (CCM) devices as a function of device size and data write time τW as well as other parameters that have bearing on efficient device operation. We find that switching energy efficiency scales approximately linearly with both quantities over multiple decades, departing from linearity only when τW approaches the ∼0.5 ps intrinsic switching limit. Compared to current state of the art memory devices, CCM devices are found to be much faster and significantly more energy efficient, demonstrated here with two-terminal switching using 2.2 fJ, 16 ps electrical pulses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TaS2; charge configuration memory; cryogenic; energy-efficient; nonvolatile; ultrafast

Year:  2022        PMID: 35688423      PMCID: PMC9228410          DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   12.262


Research in the area of novel memory devices has been intense in the recent decades, but there have been few breakthroughs that have led to implementation.[1−3] As a result, technologies such as cryocomputing that promise large improvements in energy consumption have been seriously hindered by the absence of a suitable fast and energy-efficient memory for more than two decades.[4,5] As an alternative to modern magnetic devices, manipulating charge, rather than spins, for data storage could be more efficient because it can be directly driven by electrical charge injection that promises to be extremely fast and efficient. Unfortunately, the direct coupling of an electronic two-level system to lattice degrees of freedom causes rapid state decoherence and dissipation, which fundamentally limits charge-storage based memory concepts. As an apparent solution to this problem, it was shown recently that topological protection that stabilizes different charge density wave (CDW) domain states in the quasi-2D layered transition metal chalcogenide 1T-TaS2 can be used for memory devices.[6,7] The basic mechanism for such a charge configuration memory (CCM) was shown to be unique to this material,[7−9] involving reversible charge reconfiguration from an insulating, spatially uniform CDW state to a metallic domain state[10] with accompanying restacking of the CDW along the direction perpendicular to the layers.[11] To develop the CCM concept into viable practical devices, a better understanding of the device characteristics is required, particularly the operational limitations, such as write speed, energy efficiency, and endurance, as well as size scaling limitations and contact material compatibility. For low temperature operation, minimization of dissipation is essential, so investigation of how the switching energy scales with device size is particularly important. The write (W) cycle of the CCM device was shown to be nonthermal, while the erase (E) cycle is at least partially thermal.[7] Intrinsic nonohmic behavior and dissipation at the contacts,[12] especially if energy barriers are formed as a result of interface chemistry, may limit the energy efficiency in small devices.[13] In this paper we investigate CCM scaling properties in the nonvolatile resistance switching region, which is particularly relevant for incorporation into cryocomputing environments where the device has potential applications. We investigate the electrical contact structure with high resolution electron microscopy, searching for possible interfacial layers that may limit device performance. We conclude by comparing the measured characteristics of CCM with other current and emerging memory devices. The devices were nanofabricated by evaporating metal contacts on 1T-TaS2 single crystal flakes as can be seen on a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image in Figure a (see Methods in Suppporting Information). Switching characteristics were measured on many devices with very different gap sizes L (Figure b) between the Au electrodes, using a large range of “write” pulse lengths τW, from 16 ps to 600 ms. For short pulse switching, low-attenuation transmission line circuits were used in combination with picosecond digital electronics (see Methods in Supporting Information). We first present an analysis of the contact structure in Au/1T-TaS2 devices on Si/SiO2 substrates. A bright-field scanning transmission electron microscope (BF-STEM) image of a cross-section of two electrodes (one memory bit) and a zoom-in on the interface between the metal electrodes and 1T-TaS2 can be seen in Figure b and Figure c, respectively. The layered structure of the 1T-TaS2 crystal is clearly visible in Figure c. Part of the cross-section showing the entire structure of the device can be seen in Figure d. An energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the device’s interfaces is presented in Figure e, along the line scan marked with the red line in Figure d. Considering the overlap in the EDS spectrum for certain characteristic lines of elements (Ta M and Si K, Au M and S K), the individual layers of the fabricated CCM device can be identified (Figure e). Importantly, multiple EDS analyses (at ∼1 nm resolution) on different devices do not show any evidence of an oxide layer at the interface between the 1T-TaS2 crystal and the metal electrode, consistent with a previous report[13] and the voltage–current characteristics discussed below.
Figure 1

CCM device, EDS, and work function analysis. (a) SEM image of a typical CCM device used for measurements with transmission line contacts. (b) BF-STEM image of a cross-section of a fabricated CCM device (one memory bit). (c) Zoom-in to the interface between the metal electrode and 1T-TaS2 crystal. (d) Zoom-in to a part of the cross-section with the EDS line scan marked. (e) EDS analysis of the zoomed-in section, where individual layers are identified: Au (yellow), Pd (green), Ta (dark blue), S (light blue), Si (red), O (black), Ti (pink). (f) Top panel shows an AFM image of a part of the CCM device with the line scan for the KPFM measurement marked. Bottom panel shows KPFM measurement of the work functions for 1T-TaS2, SiO2, and Au electrodes along the line scan. (g) Schematic band diagram of the device based on the KPFM measurements. On the left is a band diagram of an interface between the Au electrode and the nearly commensurate (NC) metallic state at room temperature, and on the right is an interface between the Au electrode and the commensurate (C) charge density wave state at cryogenic temperature.

CCM device, EDS, and work function analysis. (a) SEM image of a typical CCM device used for measurements with transmission line contacts. (b) BF-STEM image of a cross-section of a fabricated CCM device (one memory bit). (c) Zoom-in to the interface between the metal electrode and 1T-TaS2 crystal. (d) Zoom-in to a part of the cross-section with the EDS line scan marked. (e) EDS analysis of the zoomed-in section, where individual layers are identified: Au (yellow), Pd (green), Ta (dark blue), S (light blue), Si (red), O (black), Ti (pink). (f) Top panel shows an AFM image of a part of the CCM device with the line scan for the KPFM measurement marked. Bottom panel shows KPFM measurement of the work functions for 1T-TaS2, SiO2, and Au electrodes along the line scan. (g) Schematic band diagram of the device based on the KPFM measurements. On the left is a band diagram of an interface between the Au electrode and the nearly commensurate (NC) metallic state at room temperature, and on the right is an interface between the Au electrode and the commensurate (C) charge density wave state at cryogenic temperature. To further ascertain the possible role of contacts in device functionality we measured the relative difference in work functions of the 1T-TaS2 and Au in a CCM device using a Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). The upper panel in Figure f shows an atomic force microscope (AFM) image of a part of the CCM device, while the bottom panel in Figure f shows the KPFM potential difference as a function of the scanning position on the device. The scanning is performed across the 1T-TaS2 crystal, the Si/SiO2 substrate and the Au electrode, as indicated with the dashed line in Figure f, top panel. While the absolute value of was not calibrated, the relative difference of work functions is accurately determined,in agreement with published values for = 5.5 ± 0.01 eV (single crystal)[14] and = 5.1–5.47 eV.[15] Judging from the KPFM measurement and the values from ref (15), it looks like our gold layer has facets with predominantly (100) or (110) orientation. The corresponding band diagrams for the room-temperature nearly commensurate (NC) metallic state and the low-temperature commensurate charge density wave (C-CDW) are shown in Figure g. Ideally electron injection from Au metal into the 1T-TaS2 CDW-gapped semiconductor with a gap eV [16] takes place (Figure g), and the junction is expected to be ohmic. 1T-TaS2 reacts to charge injection by forming a conducting interface layer parallel to the interface. We thus do not expect a barrier to form at the interface with Au contacts due to carrier diffusion, which is consistent with the observed linear voltage–current curves[6] and the scaling behavior with device size and τW described in the following section. While basic memristive switching of the CCM device at higher temperatures was discussed elsewhere,[6] a measurement that demonstrates millikelvin operation and switching from the high resistance (HI) state to low (LO) resistance state is illustrated by the R–T curve in Figure a, for a device with intercontact distance nm. The entire measurement cycle is shown starting from 280 K, cooling and switching at 350 mK by a single write (W) pulse, and heating back to 280 K, where the system reverts to its original state. Upon heating we observe characteristic steps, previously attributed to relaxation of domains.[7,17] The insert to Figure a shows the R–T curves on an expanded scale, showing a commonly observed hysteresis associated with the presence of additional phases[18,19] above 100 K.
Figure 2

Resistance switching and voltage–current characteristics of CCM devices. (a) Temperature dependence of the four-contact resistance R. Switching from RHI to RLO at 350 mK is caused by an electrical W pulse as indicated by the arrow. Heating above 90 K (red line) reverts the system to the RHI state. Inset to (a) shows the expanded scale of the R–T curve. (b, c) Pulsed measurements of the V–I curve for the W and E operations, respectively.

Resistance switching and voltage–current characteristics of CCM devices. (a) Temperature dependence of the four-contact resistance R. Switching from RHI to RLO at 350 mK is caused by an electrical W pulse as indicated by the arrow. Heating above 90 K (red line) reverts the system to the RHI state. Inset to (a) shows the expanded scale of the R–T curve. (b, c) Pulsed measurements of the V–I curve for the W and E operations, respectively. A typical voltage–current (V–I) curve for a W cycle at 20 K is shown in Figure b for incrementally increasing current pulses through the CCM device with an intercontact distance nm (see insert to Figure b). In this measurement, the pulses were very long (), illustrating the versatility of the device (fast measurements are shown later). The V–I measurement allows us to accurately determine the switching threshold for both the write and erase processes. We observe a nonlinear V–I curve with an initial slope (dashed line) up to the mA. Above this current the voltage drops from 0.65 to 0.08 V and the device switches to a linear V–I relation with resistance (dashed line), remaining in this state indefinitely at this temperature. The V–I curve for W can be fit with for (green line) and for (dashed line) in agreement with ref (6). To switch back to the pristine state, the erase (E) sequence is illustrated in Figure c where the current is ramped from to 0.4 mA. Initially we follow the RLO curve. Above a threshold mA the device switches to a high resistance state. As current is lowered to zero, the device remains in at low currents. The behavior is consistent with the previous V–I measurements with 10 μs pulses,[6] implying that it is not dependent on the pulse length over the range τW = 10–5–1 s.
Figure 3

Speed and energy efficiency scaling at 20 K. (a) Switching energy density εW as a function of pulse length τW. The inset shows the actual pulse shapes. Red line shows linear scaling, and blue line shows departure from linearity at short τW. The data point at 1.9 ps was taken from ref (21). (b) Switching threshold voltage VW as a function of distance between the electrodes L. The inset shows a device with variable L used in the measurement. Different symbol colors are for different physical devices. (c) Endurance measurement showing cycling between RLO and RHI for 106 cycles. Each pair of points represents 2 × 104 W/E cycles.

Speed and energy efficiency scaling at 20 K. (a) Switching energy density εW as a function of pulse length τW. The inset shows the actual pulse shapes. Red line shows linear scaling, and blue line shows departure from linearity at short τW. The data point at 1.9 ps was taken from ref (21). (b) Switching threshold voltage VW as a function of distance between the electrodes L. The inset shows a device with variable L used in the measurement. Different symbol colors are for different physical devices. (c) Endurance measurement showing cycling between RLO and RHI for 106 cycles. Each pair of points represents 2 × 104 W/E cycles. Using 60 GHz Au transmission line contacts, fabricated on ∼50 nm thick 1T-TaS2 flakes on Si/SiO2 substrates (see Figure a, Methods in Supporting Information), we systematically study the W sequence of multiple CCM devices for different W pulse lengths τW ranging from 16 ps to 20 μs generated by electronic pulse generators in a single-pulse mode. For each pulse length, the pulse voltage was incrementally increased until the switching threshold was reached and recorded. Since the depends on sample geometry, in Figure a, we plot the switching energy density instead: ( is the crystal volume between electrodes, and is defined as the switching energy). The error bars include the systematic error of measurements and the estimated variation between different devices. The red line shows a linear relation , with . At shorter pulse lengths there is a departure from linearity denoted with the blue line, which most likely occurs due to an increase in transmission line losses in the GHz range. For the fastest device measured here (16 ps fwhm), the distance between contacts is and threshold W voltage , which gives a switching energy per bit of at 20 K. The resistance measured before and after switching is and , respectively. The resistance ratio is lower than the value observed with longer W pulses at low temperatures such as that shown in Figure a, which may be attributed to incomplete switching. However, both and resistance states have long-term stability at this temperature (20 K). To explore the switching capabilities of the CCM device in the ultrafast limit, an electro-optical setup that allows for ps pulse generation and detection was reported in ref (21), from which we include a data point = 1.9 ps in Figure a. The scaling of the switching threshold voltage with intercontact distance is shown in Figure b. (A device with multiple L is shown in the inset.) Approximately linear scaling of is observed over nearly 2 orders of magnitude, 60 nm < L < 4 μm, that extrapolates to the origin, with a slight departure from linearity at the smallest . Considering the fact that the EDS analyses do not show any intermediate layer between Au and 1T-TaS2 and that the work function mismatch suggests ohmic contact behavior, we cannot directly attribute the observed small deviation from linearity to electrical contacts. One possible reason for the departure at small sizes may be related to the fact that the device size approaches the intrinsic 10–20 nm domain size measured in the low-resistance state of single crystals.[9,20] The efficiency of devices with feature sizes comparable to the domain size may be expected to decrease due to charge configuration pinning at the contacts. In Figure c we show a typical endurance measurement at 20 K for a device with nm. Square pulses with and amplitude V are used for W, and asymmetric triangular E pulses with peak amplitude V and are used for erase (shown in the inset to Figure c). Each pair of corresponding and values shown by black and red dots, respectively, represents a measurement after 20 000 W/E cycles. We see that is remarkably stable over cycles, while initially increases slightly and later stabilizes after cycles when the measurement was terminated. An immediate application of the device could be in cryocomputing, which has been heralded as an obvious solution to the overall challenge of reducing dissipation of computer systems.[5,22] In spite of huge research efforts and availability of superconducting circuits performing both single flux quantum (SFQ) and quantum information processing,[22] the absence of a fast low-energy cryogenic memory has prevented significant upscaling,[4,5] so CCM devices may offer a possible breakthrough. Considering the scaling limits of CCM devices, we find that while the measured value of is small compared with other current memory devices, the observed scaling laws suggest that can be reduced further by reducing and/or . Optimization of microwave electrical contacts seems to be essential in reducing the as well, since the losses in the transmission of GHz pulses are likely to be the cause for the departure from linear scaling in Figure a. Deviations from linearity might still be expected when approaches the intrinsic switching time .[23] These effects are likely to be important for device optimization, particulary for erase protocols.[7] Fundamentally, the measured is still significantly larger than the measured microscopic barrier EB = 15–21 meV ((2.4–3.4) × 10–6 fJ) obtained from thermal activation measurements.[17] This implies that in principle devices with much smaller can be built before reaching fundamental limits. It is also instructive to compare and with the lowest possible energy difference between two states that can be discerned thermodynamically on the basis of their entropy difference (the Brillouin–Landauer (BL) thermodynamic limit[24]). At K, fJ, so the presented CCM devices in Figure are still far from this limit. For cryogenic memory applications, it is important that the CCM device could be driven by single flux quantum (SFQ) pulses. For a single SFQ pulse, the pulse energy may be estimated to = fJ, where we have assumed a typical critical current μA in the SFQ driver circuit. For a realistic CCM device with nm2 device area and a crystal thickness of 20 nm, the estimation from the linear fit in Figure a for switching with 2 ps[21] pulses gives fJ. Thus, on the basis of the presented scaling laws, CCM devices constructed using current fabrication techniques could be driven with single SFQ pulses, provided the coupling between the SFQ driver and the CCM microwave circuit is optimized. In Figure we compare operating parameters of the CCM with leading alternative technologies, including magnetic random-access memory (MRAM), phase change memory (PCM), and others. The smallest energy/bit values of 6 fJ/bit[25] and 8 fJ/bit[26] were reported for voltage-controlled magnetic anisotropy switching (MRAM) in Ta/CoFeB/MgO magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJ) and resistive switching in Ni/GeO/HfON/TaN resistive random access memory (RRAM) devices, respectively (Figure b). The lowest theoretically predicted value for MTJs of a few  [27] is comparable to the , which was already experimentally achieved in CCM. This value is still much higher than the theoretical limit of fJ predicted for CCM. PCMs have both significantly higher switching energies (>600 fJ [28]) and switching voltages (>1 V [29,30]) than CCM, and even the smallest memristors such as 6 nm crossbar memristor arrays have a write power of ,[31] which is higher than the predicted ∼0.1 for a much bigger CCM device ( nm3), estimated from the linear fit in Figure a. We note that our demonstration of a man-made nonvolatile electronic memory device uses less energy per bit (2.2 fJ/bit) than a human brain (∼10 fJ/synapse) and potentially much less than artificial synapses.[32] The CCM’s advantage is that it is >9 orders of magnitude faster.
Figure 4

Measured switching energy EW and speed of leading memory devices: (a) switching energy in correlation with device area; (b) switching times τW plotted against switching energy. References: PCM,[28,29] RRAM,[26,33−35] STT-RAM,[36−38] MRAM,[25,39] nMem,[40,41] JJ-CMOS memory,[42] OST-RAM,[43] Mott memory,[44] SRAM,[45−47] and DRAM.[47]

Measured switching energy EW and speed of leading memory devices: (a) switching energy in correlation with device area; (b) switching times τW plotted against switching energy. References: PCM,[28,29] RRAM,[26,33−35] STT-RAM,[36−38] MRAM,[25,39] nMem,[40,41] JJ-CMOS memory,[42] OST-RAM,[43] Mott memory,[44] SRAM,[45−47] and DRAM.[47] Picosecond switching speeds of CCMs are similar to those reported by photomagnetic recording.[48] However, the switching energy density per bit is significantly smaller for CCM: (0.3 J/cm3 for CCM[21] vs 6 J/cm3 for photomagnetic recording), with the added advantage of two-contact electrical W/E and read (R) operations and the possibility of a very high packing density. For CCMs the current size limit is 10–20 nm, but for photomagnetic recording the size is limited by optical wavelengths used for W/E/R (hundreds of nm). Nanowire memory (nMem)[40,41] based on superconductive loops and nanowire cryotrons, Josephson magnetic random access memory (JMRAM),[49] superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) memory,[50] and hybrid Josephson complementary metal oxide semiconductor (JJ-CMOS) memory[42,51,52] are all very promising solutions for a cryogenic memory. However, they are hard to scale down to the 10–20 nm regime and require additional driving periphery[4,53] (nMem, JMRAM and SQUID memory) or require voltage amplification for proper operation[4] (JJ-CMOS memory), which introduces additional dissipation into the circuits. Thus, with presently demonstrated scalability (feature size, 60 nm to 4 μm; pulse length, 16 ps to 600 ms; voltage, 0.3–10 V) and with a wide operating temperature range (350 mK to 190 K), the CCM devices appear to be very versatile in comparison. The operating temperature range could be extended to higher T by appropriate choice of substrate.[17] So far, no other electronically ordered material has been found to exhibit significant metastability and thus 1T-TaS2 currently is the only material for CCM application. The device variability is small, as seen from the data on multiple devices shown in the scaling plots. Importantly for applications, thin films of 1T-TaS2 can be grown by various means[54−56] promising technological flexibility. For interfacing present CCM devices with single flux quantum devices, which is an obvious target application, nanocryotrons (nTrons) have been demonstrated to be a match in terms of output voltage, speed, and impedance.[57,58] However, nTrons could introduce additional design complexity and dissipation due to higher bias currents,[51] so direct driving by SFQ pulses might be preferable. In comparison to complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) devices[42,51,52,59] and nanowire memories,[40,41] the CCM concept potentially offers advantages in terms of scaling, size, speed, energy efficiency, and operational simplicity. Compared with other fast memory, such as photomagnetic storage,[48] CCMs are more energy efficient and offer much higher data packing densities. The disadvantage is low-temperature operation, but considering its primary virtues are speed and energy efficiency, the target applications are in the cryocomputing environment. The presently measured energy efficiency (2.2 fJ/bit) is a consequence of very short write pulses needed, allowed by the inherent switching mechanism. Thus, the values shown here are limited by device size and transmission characteristics of the high-speed microwave circuit, not the intrinsic mechanism. We conclude that while 1T-TaS2 appears to be unique in exhibiting combined set of properties useful for CCM operation, multilayer structures may introduce additional functionality that may result in improved performance and extended temperature range of operation. The additional degrees of freedom arising from interlayer interactions and proximity coupling[60] in 2D heterostructures may be expected to offer new possibilities for new CCM devices beyond the currently available materials.
  18 in total

1.  Phase-change heterostructure enables ultralow noise and drift for memory operation.

Authors:  Keyuan Ding; Jiangjing Wang; Yuxing Zhou; He Tian; Lu Lu; Riccardo Mazzarello; Chunlin Jia; Wei Zhang; Feng Rao; Evan Ma
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Memristor crossbar arrays with 6-nm half-pitch and 2-nm critical dimension.

Authors:  Shuang Pi; Can Li; Hao Jiang; Weiwei Xia; Huolin Xin; J Joshua Yang; Qiangfei Xia
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Sub-100 fJ and sub-nanosecond thermally driven threshold switching in niobium oxide crosspoint nanodevices.

Authors:  Matthew D Pickett; R Stanley Williams
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.874

4.  A kinetic-inductance-based superconducting memory element with shunting and sub-nanosecond write times.

Authors:  Adam N McCaughan; Emily Toomey; Michael Schneider; Karl K Berggren; Sae Woo Nam
Journal:  Supercond Sci Technol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.219

5.  Ultrafast nonthermal photo-magnetic recording in a transparent medium.

Authors:  A Stupakiewicz; K Szerenos; D Afanasiev; A Kirilyuk; A V Kimel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Fast electronic resistance switching involving hidden charge density wave states.

Authors:  I Vaskivskyi; I A Mihailovic; S Brazovskii; J Gospodaric; T Mertelj; D Svetin; P Sutar; D Mihailovic
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Controlling the metal-to-insulator relaxation of the metastable hidden quantum state in 1T-TaS2.

Authors:  Igor Vaskivskyi; Jan Gospodaric; Serguei Brazovskii; Damjan Svetin; Petra Sutar; Evgeny Goreshnik; Ian A Mihailovic; Tomaz Mertelj; Dragan Mihailovic
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Organic core-sheath nanowire artificial synapses with femtojoule energy consumption.

Authors:  Wentao Xu; Sung-Yong Min; Hyunsang Hwang; Tae-Woo Lee
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Collapse of layer dimerization in the photo-induced hidden state of 1T-TaS2.

Authors:  Quirin Stahl; Maximilian Kusch; Florian Heinsch; Gaston Garbarino; Norman Kretzschmar; Kerstin Hanff; Kai Rossnagel; Jochen Geck; Tobias Ritschel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.