Literature DB >> 3568709

Cerebral lateralisation at different stages of facial processing.

A J Parkin, P Williamson.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported which explore the cerebral lateralisation of different stages of facial processing. In Experiment 1 subjects were briefly presented with either upright or inverted Mooney faces to either the left or right visual field. The subjects' task was to decide whether or not the stimulus had the configuration of a face. The data showed a left visual field superiority in performing this task. In Experiment 2 subjects were briefly presented with line drawings of faces to either the left or right visual field. On half the trials all the facial features were intact whilst in the remainder one feature had been replaced by an anomalous feature in the same position. The subjects were required to detect whether an anomalous feature was present or not and this task produced a right visual field superiority. These data argue against a global right hemisphere superiority in facial processing and suggest, instead, that hemispheric superiority will vary depending on the stage of facial analysis investigated. On the basis of these and other recent findings it would appear that the right hemisphere is advantaged for the holistic stages of facial processing whilst the left-hemisphere has superiority for analysis at the level of individual features. However, the data are ambiguous as to whether the hemispheric differences detected reflect face-specific or general processing characteristics of the cerebral hemispheres.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3568709     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(87)80022-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  15 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials in humans during recognition of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  E S Mikhailova; D V Davydov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Alison Harris; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cortical regions associated with different aspects of object recognition performance.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Alison B Farley
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Psychophysiology of hemispheric asymmetry. The "entropy" of right-hemisphere activity.

Authors:  V S Rotenberg; V V Arshavsky
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Can we learn from the clinically significant face processing deficits, prosopagnosia and Capgras delusion?

Authors:  E Wacholtz
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Goedele Van Belle; Wim Vanduffel; Bruno Rossion; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Being BOLD: The neural dynamics of face perception.

Authors:  Francesco Gentile; Justin Ales; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response.

Authors:  Justin M Ales; Faraz Farzin; Bruno Rossion; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.