| Literature DB >> 35685669 |
U Raghavendra1, Joel Koh En Wei2, Anjan Gudigar1, Akanksha Shetty1, Jyothi Samanth3, Ganesh Paramasivam4, Sujay Jagadish4, Nahrizul Adib Kadri5, Murat Karabatak6, Özal Yildirim6, N Arunkumar7, Ali Abbasian Ardakani8.
Abstract
Hypertension (HTN) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. At least 45% of deaths due to heart disease and 51% of deaths due to stroke are the result of hypertension. According to research on the prevalence and absolute burden of HTN in India, HTN positively correlated with age and was present in 20.6% of men and 20.9% of women. It was estimated that this trend will increase to 22.9% and 23.6% for men and women, respectively, by 2025. Controlling blood pressure is therefore important to lower both morbidity and mortality. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is a noninvasive technique which can determine subtle myocardial structural changes at an early stage. In this work, we show how a multi-resolution analysis-based CAD system can be utilized for the detection of early HTN-induced left ventricular heart muscle changes with the help of ultrasound imaging. Firstly, features were extracted from the ultrasound imagery, and then the feature dimensions were reduced using a locality sensitive discriminant analysis (LSDA). The decision tree classifier with contourlet and shearlet transform features was later employed for improved performance and maximized accuracy using only two features. The developed model is applicable for the evaluation of cardiac structural alteration in HTN and can be used as a standalone tool in hospitals and polyclinics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35685669 PMCID: PMC9168207 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5616939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Data description.
| Classes | No. of subjects | Male/female count | Age range (mean ± SD) | No. of images |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 51 | 31/19 | 52.59 ± 17.79 | 51 |
| HTN | 61 | 42/12 | 49.36 ± 12.74 | 61 |
Figure 1Normal and HTN image samples.
Figure 2Systematic view of the proposed model.
Classification accuracy (%) for various classifiers using different multi-resolution techniques.
| Classifier | CNTLet | CRVLet | DTcomWT | EWT | SHELet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT | 99.11 | 97.32 | 99.11 | 98.21 | 99.11 | |
| DL | 98.21 | 97.32 | 98.21 | 98.21 | 99.11 | |
| DQ | 97.32 | 96.43 | 95.54 | 89.29 | 96.43 | |
| svmPoly_1 | 98.21 | 97.32 | 99.11 | 98.21 | 99.11 | |
| svmPoly_2 | 98.21 | 97.32 | 98.21 | 97.32 | 99.11 | |
| svmPoly_3 | 96.43 | 96.43 | 97.32 | 94.64 | 96.43 | |
| svmRBF | 98.21 | 97.32 | 98.21 | 98.21 | 98.21 | |
| kNN | 98.21 | 97.32 | 98.21 | 97.32 | 99.11 | |
| probNN | 98.21 | 97.32 | 99.11 | 98.21 | 99.11 | |
Figure 3Best performance of various multi-resolution approaches.
Figure 4CNTLet transformation for normal and HTN images.
Figure 5SHELet transformation for normal and HTN images.
Initial 10 features of CNTLet transformed features.
| Features | Normal | HTN |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| LSDA4 | 0.0031 | 0.0018 | 0.0005 | 0.0012 | ≤0.001 | 8.9935 |
| LSDA3 | −0.0106 | 0.0017 | −0.0085 | 0.0014 | ≤0.001 | 7.1636 |
| LSDA2 | 0.0102 | 0.0028 | 0.0098 | 0.0001 | 0.2577 | 1.1449 |
| LSDA13 | −0.0054 | 0.0034 | −0.0060 | 0.0030 | 0.3231 | 0.9930 |
| LSDA1 | 0.0120 | 0.0031 | 0.0116 | 0.0001 | 0.3292 | 0.9852 |
| LSDA5 | 0.0040 | 0.0027 | 0.0036 | 0.0011 | 0.4096 | 0.8301 |
| LSDA10 | −0.0141 | 0.0022 | −0.0138 | 0.0018 | 0.4429 | 0.7705 |
| LSDA16 | −0.0023 | 0.0030 | −0.0027 | 0.0018 | 0.4886 | 0.6958 |
| LSDA23 | 0.0184 | 0.0011 | 0.0182 | 0.0029 | 0.5616 | 0.5828 |
| LSDA12 | 0.0170 | 0.0028 | 0.0172 | 0.0018 | 0.6112 | 0.5103 |
Initial 10 features of SHELet transformed features.
| Features | Normal | HTN |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| LSDA2 | −0.0363 | 0.0388 | 0.0457 | 0.0467 | ≤0.001 | 10.1429 |
| LSDA5 | 0.0228 | 0.0771 | −0.0091 | 0.0425 | 0.0101 | 2.6400 |
| LSDA3 | 0.0210 | 0.0311 | −0.0049 | 0.0740 | 0.0148 | 2.4877 |
| LSDA1 | −0.0058 | 0.0896 | 0.0107 | 0.0074 | 0.1975 | 1.3058 |
| LSDA4 | −0.0034 | 0.0465 | −0.0155 | 0.0723 | 0.2870 | 1.0703 |
| LSDA8 | −0.0086 | 0.0771 | −0.0006 | 0.0524 | 0.5325 | 0.6268 |
| LSDA7 | 0.0058 | 0.0740 | −0.0012 | 0.0520 | 0.5705 | 0.5695 |
| LSDA6 | 0.0103 | 0.0177 | 0.0164 | 0.0860 | 0.5867 | 0.5463 |
| LSDA30 | −0.0007 | 0.0716 | 0.0053 | 0.0588 | 0.6342 | 0.4774 |
| LSDA24 | 0.0153 | 0.0663 | 0.0095 | 0.0646 | 0.6397 | 0.4694 |
Figure 6Various classifier performances for CNTLet-LSDA combination.
Figure 7Various classifier performances for SHELet-LSDA combination.
Figure 8Wireless based IoT architecture for the assessment of cardiac structural alteration in hypertension.