Literature DB >> 3568561

Theoretical limits to sensitivity and resolution in impedance imaging.

A D Seagar, D C Barber, B H Brown.   

Abstract

In any practical impedance imaging system it is important to be able to predict the image quality which can be expected from particular measurements. It is of interest both to establish the smallest object that can be detected for a certain noise level and to determine the maximum resolution for a certain number of electrodes. In impedance imaging this is not straightforward. The reason is that the resolution and the accuracy of an image which represents a conductive region are related to the number of electrodes and to the noise on the measurements. They also vary with position in the image and depend on the particular distribution of conductivity itself. It is therefore not possible, in general, to make quantitative statements about the resolution and accuracy. It is of course possible to make qualitative statements, but they are not of much use in any particular situation. Formulations are presented here which do allow quantitative assessment of the resolution and accuracy in a certain class of conductive regions. The regions to which they apply are two-dimensional and have a circular boundary shape. The details of the approach are included, both mathematically and descriptively. The quantitative improvement in image quality which can be obtained by reducing the noise, is shown both in terms of accuracy and resolution. The limit to the improvement in quality which can be obtained by taking unlimited independent measurements (i.e. using an unlimited number of electrodes) is calculated. It is shown how to predict the smallest sized object that can just be detected by measurements with a known level of noise.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3568561     DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/8/4a/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0143-0815


  9 in total

1.  Fast imaging for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Mark J Hamamura; L Tugan Muftuler
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Magnetic Manipulation of Blood Conductivity with Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Loaded Erythrocytes.

Authors:  Gavin R Philips; Bernhard Gleich; Genaro A Paredes-Juarez; Antonella Antonelli; Mauro Magnani; Jeff W M Bulte
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  Sparse reconstruction of log-conductivity in current density impedance tomography.

Authors:  Madhu Gupta; Rohit Kumar Mishra; Souvik Roy
Journal:  J Math Imaging Vis       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 1.627

4.  Multi-frequency static imaging in electrical impedance tomography: Part 1. Instrumentation requirements.

Authors:  P J Riu; J Rosell; A Lozano; R Pallàs-Areny
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  A robust current pattern for the detection of intraventricular hemorrhage in neonates using electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  T Tang; Sungho Oh; R J Sadleir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Single-step 3-d image reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography: theoretical limits of spatial resolution and contrast to noise ratio.

Authors:  Hermann Scharfetter; Karl Hollaus; Javier Rosell-Ferrer; Robert Merwa
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Assessment of electrical impedance endotomography for hardware specification.

Authors:  J Jossinet; A Fournier-Desseux; A Matias
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-04-01

8.  Enhancing Sharp Features by Locally Relaxing Regularization for Reconstructed Images in Electrical Impedance Tomography.

Authors:  Nanda V Ranade; Damayanti C Gharpure
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2019-07-02

9.  Single acquisition electrical property mapping based on relative coil sensitivities: A proof-of-concept demonstration.

Authors:  José P Marques; Daniel K Sodickson; Ozlem Ipek; Christopher M Collins; Rolf Gruetter
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.668

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.