| Literature DB >> 35685456 |
Abhijit Das1, Barshana Bhattacharya1, Souvik Roy1.
Abstract
Cancer is one of those leading diseases worldwide, which takes millions of lives every year. Researchers are continuously looking for specific approaches to eradicate the deadly disease, ensuring minimal adverse effects along with more therapeutic significance. Targeting of different aberrantly regulated signaling pathways, involved in cancer, is surely one of the revolutionary chemotherapeutic approach. In this instance, GSK3 and PI3K signaling cascades are considered as important role player for both the oncogenic activation and inactivation which further leads to cancer proliferation and metastasis. In this review, we have discussed the potential role of GSK3 and PI3K signaling in cancer, and we further established the crosstalk between PI3K and GSK3 signaling, through showcasing their cross activation, cross inhibition and convergence pathways in association with cancer. We also exhibited the effect of GSK3 on the efficacy of PI3K inhibitors to overcome the drug resistance and preventing the cell proliferation, metastasis in a combinatorial way with GSK3 inhibitors for a better treatment strategy in clinical settings.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; Chemotherapy; Drug resistance; GSK3; PI3K
Year: 2022 PMID: 35685456 PMCID: PMC9170611 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2021.12.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Dis ISSN: 2352-3042
Figure 1PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling cascade towards cell growth, proliferation and differentiation.
Figure 2GSK3 signaling cascade towards cell cycle regulation and gene expression profiling.
Summary of trials, outcomes and adverse effects associated with PI3K inhibitors in various phases of clinical studies.
| Treatment and reference | Phase and NCT | Clinical outcomes | Adverse effects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buparlisib in combination with Everolimus (Eve) in patients with advanced solid tumors | I, | The combination was well tolerated and safe in these patients. The MTD and RP2D for Eve and Bup was 5 and 60 mg, respectively, when on continuous daily schedule. There was no evidence of drug–drug interaction with concurrent administration of Eve and Bup. Paired skin biopsies for baseline and cycle 1 patients demonstrated target engagement with modulation of mTOR/PI3K signaling pathway biomarkers. There was a marked reduction in pS6 and p4EBP1 levels in cycle 1 biopsies compared to baseline. | Diarrhea, nausea, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, muscular pain, anorexia, fatigue and elevated ALT/AST. 7 patients had additional DLTs such as mucositis, acute kidney injury and urinary tract infection. Gr 4 and 5 adverse effects were rarely observed. |
| Buparlisib in combination with MEK162/Binimetinib in patients with advanced solid tumors | I, | The combination showed promising activity in patients with ovarian cancer with RAS/BRAF mutation. The MTD for Bup and MEK162 was established at 90 mg/day and 45 mg twice daily dose, respectively. The RP2D for Bup was determined as 80 mg/day and MEK162 45 mg twice daily dose. Other dosing strategies such as pulsatile dosing should be adopted for further trials as continuous dosing led to intolerable toxicities. | Central serous retinopathy, diarrhea, stomatitis, pneumonia, vomiting, nausea, maculopapular rash, increase in ALT and elevation in blood creatine phosphokinase. |
| Buparlisib in combination with Temozolamide (Tem) and Radiation Therapy in newly diagnosed | I, | Due to challenging safety profile and inability to achieve the MTD, the sponsor decided not to pursue the use of Bup in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. | |
| Buparlisib in combination with mAb targeting EGFR, Panitumumab (Pani) in patients with metastatic/advanced RAS-WT colorectal cancer | Ib, | The combination of Bup (given 5 days a week) and Pani (6 mg/kg by IV route biweekly) was well tolerated ( | mucositis, fatigue, palmar-plantar erthrodyesthesia, rash, acneiform, hypomagnesemia and increased AST/ALT. |
| Buparlisib in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor for whom treatment failed prior to Imatinib and Sunitinib therapy | Ib, | The combination failed to provide additional benefits compared to current therapies that are available for these patients ( | |
| Buparlisib in combination Carboplatin or Lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme | Ib/II, | The combination did not demonstrate sufficient anti-tumor efficacy compared to single-agent Lom or Carbo. The study did not proceed to phase II trial. | |
| Buparlisib in R/R CLL patients | II, | Bup demonstrated significant toxicities and further testing of Bup in these patients was ceased ( | |
| Buparlisib in TNBC patients | II, | No confirmed objective responses were observed and Bup was not associated with a strong clinical efficacy in TNBC patients as a single agent ( | |
| Buparlisib in combination with LGX818/Encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and MEK162/Binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) in patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma (LOGIC-2) | II, | The triple therapy was feasible depending on genetic alterations but low clinical activity was observed ( | |
| Copanlisib plus the MEK inhibitor, Refametinib (Ref) in advanced cancer patients | I, | In this dose-escalation ( | Fatigue, diarrhea, nausea and acneiform rash. DLTs included oral mucositis increased ALT/AST, rash acneiform, hypertension and diarrhea. |
| Copanlisib in patients with solid tumors and NHL patients | I, | PRP pAKT levels demonstrated sustained reductions from baseline post-Cop treatment [median inhibition: 0.4 mg/kg, 73.8% (range-94.9 to 144.0); 0.8 mg/kg, 79.6% (range-96.0 to 408.0)]. Tumor pAKT was lowered versus baseline with Cop 0.8 mg/kg in paired biopsy samples. Dose-related transient plasma glucose elevations were seen. Cop plasma exposure significantly correlated with alterations in plasma pAKT levels and glucose metabolism markers. | Hyperglycemia, fatigue and hypertension. |
| Copanlisib in Chinese patients | I, | Cop PK exposure profiles were in the same range as of those from previous studies of Cop in non-Chinese patients in clinical dose of 60 mg. The ORR was 50% (95% CI: 21.1, 78.9) with 6 patients achieving a best response of a PR in 1 patient and SD in 6 patient. | Hyperglycemia, transient hypertension both Gr 3. However, no Gr 4 or Gr 5 adverse events observed. |
GSK-3 activity in clinical trials/studies.
| Treatment and reference | Outcome | Clinical trial | NCT |
|---|---|---|---|
| The protein kinase C beta inhibitor Enzastaurin results in inhibition of AKT which leads to activation of GSK-3. The effects of Enzataurin and the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFa) inhibitor Bevacizumab were examined in advanced or metastatic cancer patients. | Finished Phase I study. 67 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. Good results with patients with ovarian cancers. 50.4% of ovarian cancer patients remained without disease progression after 6 months. | Enzastaurin and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cancer | |
| To determine effects of combination of enzataurin and bevacizumab in adults with glioma. | Finished Phase II study with 81 patients with glioblastomas (GBM, | Phase II study with enzastaurin (LY317615) in combination with bevacizumab in adults with recurrent malignant gliomas. | |
| Combining the EGFR/HER2 inhibitor with the proteasomal inhibitor bortezomib. Lapatinib should inhibit AKT activity which will lead to GSK-3 activity. | Phase I study was terminated due to withdrawal of sponsor support | A Phase I Study of the HER1, HER2 Dual Kinase Inhibitor, Lapatinib Plus the Proteasomal Inhibitor Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Malignancies | |
| Effects of Trametinib MEK inhibitor and pan AKT inhibitor (GSK2141795) treatment in melanoma. Suppression of AKT should result in increased. | Completed, Phase II clinical study did not reveal any clinical benefit of trametinib and GSK2141795 treatment in melanoma patients with NRAS mutations or wild-type melanoma. GSK 2141795 inhibited phosphorylation of GSK3β | Trametinib With GSK2141795 in BRAF Wild-type Melanoma | |
| Treatment of humans and mouse model of recurrent GBM with temozolomide (TMZ) and other drugs which suppress GSK-3β (cimetidine, lithium, olanzapine, and valproate, (CLOVA) cocktail. The safety and efficacy of the CLOVA cocktail) in combination with TMZ were performed to human and murine studies. | Inhibition of active GSK-3β in the tumor resulted in increased patient survival. The combination of TMZ and the CLOVA cocktail significantly inhibited cell invasion and TMZ increased survival compared to patients treated with TMZ alone. Active GSK-3β was associated with a poor prognosis | Clinical study in Japan completed with 7 GBM patients. |
Figure 3Interplay between PI3K and GSK3 signaling cascade through cross activation and cross inhibition.
Figure 4The pathway convergence between PI3K and GSK3 signaling axis.
Figure 5Schematic representation of resistance developed on cancer against PI3K inhibitors through GSK3 modulation.