| Literature DB >> 35685173 |
Nazish Qadeer1, Naila Jabeen2, Latif U Khan3, Manzar Sohail4, Muhammad Zaheer5, Muhammad Vaqas6, Afia Kanwal1, Fatima Sajid1, Samina Qamar1, Zareen Akhter1.
Abstract
The goal of this work was to synthesize new cerium oxide-based nano-additives to minimise emissions from spark ignition (SI) engines fueled with gasoline blends, such as carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NO x ). To investigate the effect of transition metal dopants on their respective catalytic oxidation activity, nano-sized CeO2 catalysts co-doped with Mn, Fe, Cu and Ag ions were successfully produced by a simple hydrothermal technique. The synthesis of nano-catalysts with cubic fluorite geometry was confirmed by XRD data. The addition of transition metal ions to the CeO2 lattice increased the concentration of structural defects like oxygen vacancies and Ce3+ ions, which are advantageous for the catalytic oxidation reaction, as also supported by XAFS and RAMAN analysis. Further, nano-gasoline fuel emission parameters are measured and compared to straight gasoline fuel. The results demonstrated that harmful exhaust pollutants such as CO, HC and NO x were significantly reduced. The high surface area, better redox characteristics and presence of additional oxygen vacancy sites or Ce3+ ions have been linked to the improved catalytic performance of the synthesized catalyst. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35685173 PMCID: PMC9125985 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra01954j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
All the indicators of test engine experiments
| Type of engine | Four strokes, air cooled and single cylinder SI engine |
|---|---|
| Bore | 58 mm |
| Stroke | 56.4 mm |
| Maximal power | 11 000 W @ 8500 rpm |
| Maximal torque | 12.76 Nm @ 6500 rpm |
| Ratio of compression | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel injection system | Constant vacuum carburetor |
| Type of fuel | Gasoline |
| Idling speed | 1400 ± 50 |
| Valve timing | Consumption opens 12.1° crank angle (CA) before top dead center (TDC) |
| Consumption closes 55.5° CA after bottom dead center (BDC) | |
| Exhaust opens 36.5° CA earlier BDC | |
| Exhaust closes 14.1° CA afterward TDC | |
| Timing of ignition | 9.1° CA before TDC |
Descriptions of exhaust gas analyzer
| Sensor | Range (ppm) | Resolution (ppm) | Accuracy (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon monoxide (CO) | 0 to 8000 | 1.00 | <300, (10–8000), 4% |
| Hydrocarbon (HC) | 4000 to 20 000 | 1.00 | >2000, 10% |
| Nitric oxide (NO) | 0 to 4000 | 1.00 | <100, (5–4000), 4% |
| Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) | 0 to 1000 | 1.00 | <100, (5–1000), 4% |
| Hydrogen sulphide(H2S) | 0 to 500 | 1.00 | <100, (5–500), 4% |
| Sulphur dioxide (SO2) | 0 to 4000 | 1.00 | <100, (5–4000), 4% |
Fig. 1XRD pattern of pure CeO2, Mn/Fe–CeO2, Cu/Ag–CeO2, Fe/Cu–CeO2 and Mn/Cu–CeO2.
Fig. 2Raman results of undoped CeO2, Mn/Fe–CeO2, Cu/Ag–CeO2, Fe/Cu–CeO2 and Mn/Cu–CeO2.
Fig. 3(a) Normalized XANES spectra of the d-transition metal ions co-doped CeO2 nanomaterials collected at the Ce L3-edge (5723 eV) (left) and Cu K-edge (8979 eV) (right). For clarity the curves are vertically offset. (b) The Fourier transforms of k3-weighted EXAFS with best fits at Ce L3-edge (5723 eV) for the commercial CeO2 and d-transition metal ions doped CeO2, including (A1) Cu/Ag–CeO2, (B2) Fe/Cu–CeO2 (left) and (C3) Fe/Cu–CeO2, (F2) Mn/Cu–CeO2 (right), revealing both the amplitude and the real parts of the Fourier transforms of the data [χ(k)] and the fits. (c) The Fourier transforms of k3-weighted EXAFS signals with best fits at the Cu K-edge (8979 eV) for the Cu/Ag–CeO2 (A1), Fe/Cu–CeO2 (B2) (left) and Fe/Cu–CeO2 (C3), Mn/Cu–CeO2 (F2) nanomaterials (right), revealing both the amplitude and the real parts of the Fourier transforms of their data [χ(k)] and the fits.
Derived fitting parameters of EXAFS, involving N: coordination number, R: mean coordination shell radius, σ2: mean square relative displacement (MSRD) or Debye–Waller factor, So2: amplitude reduction factor, Eo: photoelectron energy and Rfactor: goodness of the fit for the Ce L3-edge (5723 eV) χ(k) of CeO2 and d-transition metal ions (Cu, Fe and Mn) co-doped CeO2
| Materials | Bond type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CeO2 | Ce–O | 8 | 2.329 ± 0.009 | 0.0069 ± 0.0035 | 0.82 | 6.69 ± 1.13 | 0.019 |
| Cu/Ag–CeO2 (A1) | Ce−O | 6.8 | 2.320 ± 0.006 | 0.0080 ± 0.0012 | 0.86 | 6.92 ± 1.07 | 0.017 |
| Fe/Cu–CeO2 (C3) | Ce−O | 7.5 | 2.308 ± 0.008 | 0.0099 ± 0.0014 | 0.82 | 5.89 ± 1.48 | 0.015 |
| Fe/Cu–CeO2 (B2) | Ce−O | 7.4 | 2.309 ± 0.007 | 0.0103 ± 0.0012 | 0.88 | 5.91 ± 1.25 | 0.017 |
| Mn/Cu–CeO2 (F2) | Ce−O | 7.6 | 2.317 ± 0.008 | 0.0113 ± 0.0019 | 0.89 | 6.15 ± 1.08 | 0.019 |
Fitting parameters of EXAFS for the Cu K-edge (8979 eV) χ(k) of d-transition metal ions (Cu, Fe and Mn) co-doped CeO2 nanomaterials
| Materials | Bond type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu/Ag–CeO2 (A1) | Cu−O | 4.5 | 1.920 ± 0.007 | 0.0035 ± 0.0023 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.020 |
| Fe/Cu–CeO2 (B2) | Cu−O | 4.0 | 1.922 ± 0.007 | 0.0044 ± 0.0022 | 0.79 | 0.05 | 0.010 |
| Fe/Cu–CeO2 (C3) | Cu−O | 4.0 | 1.919 ± 0.008 | 0.0043 ± 0.0025 | 0.76 | 0.30 | 0.015 |
| Mn/Cu–CeO2 (F2) | Cu−O | 4.0 | 1.939 ± 0.006 | 0.0020 ± 0.0002 | 0.63 | 2.46 | 0.012 |
Calculated surface area values of investigated nano-catalysts
| Catalysts | Surface area (m2 g−1) |
|---|---|
| CeO2 | 41.00 |
| Mn/Fe–CeO2 | 78.093 |
| Fe/Cu–CeO2 | 85.725 |
| Mn/Cu–CeO2 | 91.773 |
| Cu/Ag–CeO2 | 49.514 |
Fig. 4.Band gap energy of transition metals co-doped cerium oxide nano-catalysts.
Fig. 5(a) Variations in emission levels of CO with respect to load. (b) Variations in emission levels of HC with respect to load. (c) Variation in the emission level of NO with respect to load.