| Literature DB >> 35685170 |
Chunyi Zhang1,2.
Abstract
In order to study a BP neural network algorithm for air particulate matter data monitoring, firstly, the monitoring data collected by particle sensor using the light scattering method are proposed. Then, based on the improved BP neural network method, the mapping relationship between the actual measured value of the sensor, weather and other influencing factors, and the standard value of the monitoring station is established, and the calibration model of air particulate matter is realized. Finally, through theoretical analysis and experimental comparison, the results show that the model based on BP neural network algorithm has good accuracy and generalization ability in the evaluation of air particulate index, which makes it possible to scientifically and accurately refine the evaluation and management of urban air particulate index. The experimental results show that the air particle calibration model based on the light scattering method and improved BP neural network algorithm is practical and effective.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35685170 PMCID: PMC9173920 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6393877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1The generation of PM2.5.
Figure 2Physiological structure of neurons.
Figure 3Activation function based on the basic structure of artificial neuron.
Predicted and real monitored PM2.5 concentration values.
| Serial number | Real monitoring value | Model predicted value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | 31.10972.526 |
| 2 | 62 | 57.84564512 |
| 3 | 50 | 54.23105623 |
| 4 | 45 | 40.89423561 |
| 5 | 33 | 43.56235871 |
| … | … | |
| 120 | 24 | 36.80122783 |
| 121 | 2.5 | 30.31336950 |
| 122 | 48 | 30.9870.3742 |
| 123 | 54 | 58.77795235 |
| 124 | 62 | 51.92018032 |
Description of model construction.
| Model input layer | 4 nodes PM2.5PM10 humidity and temperature |
|---|---|
| Model hidden layer | The maximum number of layers is 2, and the maximum number of nodes in each layer is 10 |
| Model output layer | 1 node PM2.5 |
| Model bias quantity | 1 |
| Model training data | The hourly average data of air monitoring equipment and state control points are randomly selected at a ratio of 0.9 |
| Model test data | Hourly average data of air monitoring equipment and state control points with the remaining ratio of 0.1 |
| Test evaluation function | According to the MSE evaluation standard of mean square error function, the optimal model of hidden layer is selected |
| Validation data | Hourly average data of air monitoring equipment and state control points |
Figure 4Comparison curve between PM10 model calibration value and national control points.
Figure 5Comparison curve between PM2.5 model calibration value and national control points.