Literature DB >> 35685117

Learning a language from inconsistent input: Regularization in child and adult learners.

Alison C Austin1, Kathryn D Schuler1, Sarah Furlong1, Elissa L Newport1.   

Abstract

When linguistic input contains inconsistent use of grammatical forms, children produce these forms more consistently, a process called 'regularization.' Deaf children learning American Sign Language from parents who are non-native users of the language regularize their parents' inconsistent usages (Singleton & Newport, 2004). In studies of artificial languages containing inconsistently used morphemes (Hudson Kam & Newport, 2005, 2009), children, but not adults, regularized these forms. However, little is known about the precise circumstances in which such regularization occurs. In three experiments we investigate how the type of input variation and the age of learners affects regularization. Overall our results suggest that while adults tend to reproduce the inconsistencies found in their input, young children introduce regularity: they learn varying forms whose occurrence is conditioned and systematic, but they alter inconsistent variation to be more regular. Older children perform more like adults, suggesting that regularization changes with maturation and cognitive capacities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  generalization; inconsistent input; language acquisition; morphology; rule learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 35685117      PMCID: PMC9173226          DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1954927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Learn Dev        ISSN: 1547-3341


  29 in total

1.  Children creating language: how Nicaraguan sign language acquired a spatial grammar.

Authors:  A Senghas; M Coppola
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

2.  Abstract rule learning in 11- and 14-month-old infants.

Authors:  Elena Koulaguina; Rushen Shi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-02

3.  Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: the bottleneck of non-native sign language processing.

Authors:  R I Mayberry; S D Fischer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-11

4.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Janet F Werker; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-01

5.  When regularization gets it wrong: children over-simplify language input only in production.

Authors:  Jessica F Schwab; Casey Lew-Williams; Adele E Goldberg
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2018-02-21

6.  Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning.

Authors:  Kenny Smith; Elizabeth Wonnacott
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-07-07

7.  Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial expressions.

Authors:  Emily Morgan; Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-10-21

8.  Investigating the cause of language regularization in adults: memory constraints or learning effects?

Authors:  Carla L Hudson Kam; Ann Chang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Overregularization in language acquisition.

Authors:  G F Marcus; S Pinker; M Ullman; M Hollander; T J Rosen; F Xu
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  1992

10.  Language learning, language use and the evolution of linguistic variation.

Authors:  Kenny Smith; Amy Perfors; Olga Fehér; Anna Samara; Kate Swoboda; Elizabeth Wonnacott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.