| Literature DB >> 35685081 |
Lei Zhang1, Tao Ai1, Cheng Xie1, Wanmin Xia1, Ying Zhang1, Huling Liao1, Liangqin Jia1, Yinghong Fan1, Jia Xu1.
Abstract
Background: Wheezing is one of the most common respiratory symptoms in childhood especially in infants. In recent years, the incidence of recurrent wheezing is on the rise worldwide. To investigate the lower airway microbiota in patients with recurrent wheezing and provide insights into clinical diagnosis and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; Lower airway microbiome; children; fiberoptic bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage; recurrent wheezing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35685081 PMCID: PMC9173878 DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Pediatr ISSN: 2224-4336
Epidemiologic characteristics of the 55 children investigated in this study
| Parameters | Group A | Group B | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 32 | 23 | |
| Age (month) | 15.96±5.8 | 18.52±6.14 | 0.124* |
| Sex (male/female) (number) | 19/13 | 14/9 | 0.804# |
| Gestational weeks (≥37/<37 weeks) (number) | 22/10 | 21/2 | 0.0458# |
| Mode of delivery (Natural childbirth/Caesarean) (number) | 14/18 | 17/6 | 0.0261# |
| Allergy status (+/−) (number) | 20/12 | 1/22 | 0.0000# |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophils (%) | 0.625±1.707 | 0.294±1.212 | 0.4296* |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophils (%) | 35.5±31.9 | 24.05±20.84 | 0.1194* |
| Blood eosinophils (%) | 2.05±1.7 | 1.84±1.21 | 0.6147* |
| Neutrophil count ×106/g | 9.53±3.19 | 9.37±2.5 | 0.8421* |
| Respiratory rate (rate/min) | 32.00±7.03 | 31±4.03 | 0.5427* |
Data are presented as n, n (%), mean ± SD, and median (quartile 1, quartile 3) unless otherwise indicated. *, t-test; #, Chi-square test.
Figure 1According to the results of species annotations, we selected the top 10 species with the largest abundance of each sample (A Phylum, B Genus), and generated a columnar accumulation chart to visually represent the relative abundance of each sample at different taxonomic levels.
Figure 2Community richness about Group A and Group B.
Figure 3Community diversity about Group A and Group B. *, P<0.05.
Figure 4Box plot based on the diversity of unweighted UniFrac Beta. **, P<0.001.
Figure 5Difference species analysis between groups. (A) The species with significant differences related to their phyla were Proteobacteria (P=0.003), Bacteroidota (P<0.001), Fusobacteriota (P=0.004), and Acidobacteriota (P=0.019). (B) The species with significant differences related to their class were Alphaproteobacteria (P<0.001), Bacteroidia (P<0.001), and Clostridia (P=0.038). (C) The species with significant differences related to their order were Xanthomonadales (P=0.022), Bacteroidales (P<0.001), Sphingomonadales (P=0.001), and Rhizobiales (P<0.001). (D) The species with significant differences related to their family were Xanthomonadaceae (P=0.016), Prevotellaceae (P=0.001), Sphingomonadaceae (P=0.001), and Rhizobiaceae (P<0.001). (E) The species with significant differences related to their genus were Stenotrophomonas (P=0.015), Prevotella (P=0.001), Sphingomonas (P=0.001), Phyllobacterium (P<0.001), Neisseria (P=0.014), and Haemophilus (P=0.002).