| Literature DB >> 35684894 |
Abhijeet Redekar1, Dipankar Deb1, Stepan Ozana2.
Abstract
Various mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, electrical, and hybrid actuators can alter motion per the requirements of particular applications. However, except for electrical ones, all actuators are restricted due to their size, complex auxiliary equipment, frequent need for maintenance, and sluggish environment in renewable applications. This brief review paper highlights some unique and significant research works on applying electrical actuators to renewable applications. Four renewable energy resources, i.e., solar, wind, bio-energy, and geothermal energy, are considered to review electric actuators applicable to renewable energy systems. This review analyses the types of actuators associated with the mentioned renewable application, their functioning, their motion type, present use, advantages, disadvantages, and operational problems. The information gathered in this paper may open up new ways of optimization opportunities and control challenges in electrical actuators, thereby making more efficient systems. Furthermore, some energy-efficient and cost-effective replacements of convectional actuators with new innovative ones are suggested. This work aims to benefit scientists and new entrants working on actuators in renewable energy systems.Entities:
Keywords: electric actuators; linear actuators; power consumption; renewable system; rotary actuators; spherical actuators
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35684894 PMCID: PMC9185451 DOI: 10.3390/s22114273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Active electric actuators according to their motion used in the renewable applications.
Figure 2Electric actuators functioning in solar tracking applications.
Energy consumption in continuous and step-by-step tracking [52].
| Number of Steps | One-Day Energy Production (Wh) | One-Day Energy Consumption in Actuator (Wh) | One-Day Energy Gain (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 (i.e., continuous) | 898.46 | 12.82 | 39.42 |
| 8 | 893.27 | 13.32 | 38.21 |
| 6 | 891.73 | 12.99 | 38.02 |
| 4 | 887.32 | 12.92 | 37.34 |
| 2 | 868.63 | 12.88 | 34.41 |
Figure 3Proposed alternative actuators view: (a) solar furnace with linear actuator, (b) solar panel with telescopic linear actuator, (c) street light application with spherical actuator, (d) 2 DOF spherical actuator, (e) solar tree application with spherical actuator.
Figure 4Rotary actuators functioning in solar furnace application (a) Schematic Diagram, (b) U.S. Army’s white sands solar furnace commissioned in 1972 [57,58].
Revolution in application of solar furnace actuator installed at Font Romeu Odeillo.
| Generation | Year | Actuator | Power Consumption in Actuator | Maintenance Frequency | Degree of Cleanliness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First generation | 1968–1994 | Hydraulic jacks | No available data | High (due to hydraulic leaks) | Very less |
| Second generation | 1992–2014 | Stepper motors with ball screw jacks | Up to 32 kWe | Moderate | Good |
| Third generation | 2014 onwards | BLDC with ball screw jacks | Up to 6 kWe | Low | Good |
Figure 5Valve actuator for distributed solar collector field: (a) Schematic of plant, (b) the ACUREX parabolic-trough-distributed solar field collector [62,63].
Figure 6Actuators for solar panel cleaning: (a) Hybrid actuators functioning in solar cleaning application, (b) prototype model of wheeled automatic cleaning robot [24].
Figure 7Vibration-based solar panel cleaning applications: (a) Piezo-electric actuator located on the back side of the panel; (b) Piezo-electric actuator located on the surface of the panel; (c) Eccentric Rotating Mass (ERM) motor actuator located on the back side of the solar panel, where (i) iron base for motor, (ii) solar panel frame, (iii) back side of the panel, (iv) ERM motor, (v) ERM, and (vi) connection box [70].
Figure 8Linear piezo-actuators functioning in solar cleaning applications; (a) elliptical motion of their feet, (b) the driving bar and the support, and (c) the elliptical motion and linear motion for both the driving feet [41].
Summary of actuator power consumption in different applications.
| Application | Axis/Tracking Nature | Actuator Type | Location | Generation Capacity | Actuator Power Consumption | Net Power Improvement | Simulation/ Experiment | Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solar tracking | Single continuous | Linear [ | Central Vietnam | 250 W | 2–8% | up to 30.3% (sunny), up to 15.2% (other) | Experiment | Grid connected solar plant |
| Single continuous | Linear [ | Hermosillo | No available data | No available data | No available data | Simulation | Cheaper solar array tracking | |
| Single continuous | Linear [ | NA | NA | for + | NA | Simulation | Optimum actuator location | |
| Single continuous | Rotary [ | Zimbabwe | 24 W | No available data | up to 25% | Experiment | Affordable tracker | |
| Dual continuous | Linear [ | Culiacán, Sinaloa | 135.2 W | 6.71 W | No available data | Experiment | Maintain power level | |
| Single, Intermittent (3-step) | Linear [ | Irbid | 0.4 W | Very less | around 91–94% | Experiment | Optimized 3 steps | |
| Dual, Intermittent | Rotary [ | Bangladesh | NA | 0.6 W | Up to 25.62% (compared to static) | Experiment | Low consumption in actuator | |
| Solar panel cleaning | No tracking | linear piezoelectric [ | No available data | NA | 6.8 W | Increased by 1.29 W | Laboratory testing | Energy gain improvement |
| No tracking | Piezoelectric [ | California | No available data | No available data | up to 95% | Experiment | Creates vibration | |
| No tracking | Linear [ | India | 20 W | No available data | upto 3.35 w | Experiment | For street lights | |
| No tracking | Wobbling [ | Egypt | 130 W | No available data | up to 2.912 w after 6 weeks | Experiment | For desert regions | |
| No tracking | Geared motor [ | Saudi Arabia | 200 W | No available data | up to 4.78% | Experiment | For dry and desert regions | |
| Solar furnace | Single continuous | Stepper motors with ball screw jacks [ | France | 1 MW | Up to 32 kWh | No available data | Experiment | Solar furnace with heliostat tracking |
| Single continuous | BLDC with ball screw jack [ | France | 1 MW | Up to 6 kWh | No available data | Experiment | Solar furnace with heliostat tracking | |
| Solar heating | NA | Rotary valve [ | Portugal | NA | No available data | From 250 ∘C to 260 ∘C | Experiment | Only controlling flow |
| NA | Rotary valve [ | Spain | NA | No available data | From 190 ∘C to 245 ∘C | Simulation | Flow control |
NA: Not applicable.
Figure 9Limited-angle torque actuator (LAT) [42].
Comparison of the wind turbine actuators.
| Parameters | LAT Actuator [ | Stepper-Motor-Based Actuator [ |
|---|---|---|
| Power consumption | high | low |
| Complexity | low | medium |
| Weight | high | low |
| Reliability | high | low |
| Electronic control complexity | low | medium |
| Energy harvested at high speed | medium | high |
Figure 10Cylindrical buoy actuator for wave applications.
Efficiencies of different PTO.
| Actuator and PTO Combination Type | Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|
| Hydraulic drive with oscillating body | 65 [ |
| Water turbine with oscillating body | 85 [ |
| Air turbine with OWCs | 55 [ |
| Mechanical drive with oscillating body | 90 [ |
| Piezoelectric device with oscillating body | very low [ |
| Linear generator with oscillating buoy | 95 [ |
| Linear generator with OWCs | 83.6 [ |
Figure 11Linear water pump actuators (a) variable-reluctance linear stepper motor; (b) linear pump [29].
Figure 12Localized irrigation system and latch-type Solenoids [93].
Summary of Major Performance Parameters, Specifications, and Applications.
| Types of Actuator | Major Performance Parameters/Specifications | Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Electric rotary actuator (AC motor) [ | Shutter travel time: 0.5 s for opening and closing | Solar furnace shutter operating system |
| Piezoceramic actuators [ | Frequency range: 400–5000 Hz | Solar array dust removal system |
| Electric rotary actuator (DC Motor) [ | Motor speed and gear ratio | Solar tracker |
| Piezoelectric actuator [ | DC voltage: 6 v, panel inclination angle | Solar panel cleaning |
| Relay [ | Max. coil voltage, Max contact current capacity | Controlling greenhouse parameters |
| Electromagnetic clutch [ | Coil voltage, clutch torque | Bio-gas stove |
| Induction servo motor (ISM) [ | Operating voltage, operating speed (in sec/deg), torque (kg/cm or N/m) | Agricultural machines |
| Latch type solenoids [ | Operating voltage: 12 V DC, Connection size one-eighth inch, Valve bore: 2.5 mm, Nominal power: 7 VA | Localized irrigation system |
| AC induction motor [ | Gear ratio | Biomass grate boiler |
| Linear actuator [ | Stroke length: 1005 mm, voltage: 12 V DC, speed: 4 mm/sec, force: 1500 N | Tracking applications |
| Rotary valve actuator [ | Range of motion, Valve Stem Stroke Length, Actuation Time, Fail-safe | Solar heating system |
| Linear piezoelectric actuator [ | Plates size: 10 mm × 10 mm × 1 mm, piezoelectric material: PZT-8H, operating frequency: 18.8 kHz and operating voltage: 100 | Solar panel cleaning, astronautic and aeronautic applications |
| Limited-Angle Torque (LAT) actuator [ | Threshold coil voltage, rotating angle | Over-speed protection of wind mill |
| Solenoid [ | Stroke length: 10mm, Operating voltage: 24 V DC | For limited stroke on–off position. |
Comparison of electric actuators used in the various renewable applications.
| Name of the Actuator | Advantages | Disadvantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spherical actuator |
Less space required Low power consumption Available in desired DOF Compact |
No counterbalance Sensitive to vibration |
Suitable for discrete tracking For moving large weight, latch is required for power saving Can be used for single panel tracking only |
| Rotary actuator |
Suitable for group tracking applications |
Backlash nonlinearity effect is more Quick response cannot obtained due to dead-zone nonlinearity |
Cannot provide precision motion accuracy |
| Linear actuator |
Backlash nonlinearity effect is less Compact than rotary actuator |
Large space required in solar tree application |
Space limitation for solar tree applications |
| Piezo-electric actuator |
Light weight so no adverse effect on solar panel tracking system. |
Surface vibration area is very less Complex and costly control circuitry |
Need more than one actuator for effective vibration effect |
| LAT actuator |
Automatic operation based on threshold voltage, no extra control required Low complex than rotary actuator |
Power consumption is high than rotary actuator |
Applicable only for up to 2.5kW domestic wind turbine speed control application |
| Solenoid linear valve actuator |
Operate in pressurized fluid flow Fast response time Economic feasibility |
Supply voltage deviations affects performance |
Cannot obtain intermediate stage |