| Literature DB >> 35684485 |
Zhanjiang Zhang1, Guang Shen2, Yihua Yang2, Cui Li3,4, Xiaoying Chen3,4, Xiaonan Yang3,4, Xiaoyun Guo3,4, Jianhua Miao3,4, Li Li5, Ming Lei3,4.
Abstract
The roots of Taraxacum kok-saghyz Rodin (TKS) are well-known and valued for their rubber-producing ability. Therefore, research on the analysis and detection of metabolites from the roots of TKS have been reported in previous studies. However, all of these studies have the shortcoming of focusing on only the rubber of TKS, without profiling the other metabolites in a systematic and comprehensive way. Here, the primary and secondary metabolites from the leaves of TKS were investigated using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS, and a total of 229 metabolites were characterized. Carboxylic acid derivatives, fatty acyls, phenols, and organooxygen compounds were found to be the major metabolites of TKS. The transcriptome data indicated that ribosomal, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and linoleic acid metabolism genes were significantly differentially expressed. This study is the first to report the differences in the metabolic and transcriptome profiles of TKS leaves under exogenous ethephon spray, which improves our understanding of the main metabolites and their molecular mechanisms in TKS leaves.Entities:
Keywords: Taraxacum kok-saghyz Rodin; metabolomics; transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35684485 PMCID: PMC9182187 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27113548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1(A) Schematic diagram of the experimental design. (B) The identification and classification of TKS metabolites. (C) Clustering heatmap of the 5 different stages of TKS after exogenous ethephon spraying. (D) Overview of TKS pathway analysis.
Figure 2(A) PCA scores for the five TKS groups. (B–E) Volcano plots of the differentially accumulated metabolites in the Eth2 vs. CK, Eth4 vs. CK, Eth8 vs. CK, Eth24 vs. CK groups, respectively.
Figure 3(A) Cluster analysis of the identified metabolites from the five stages. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of the five stages. (C) Advanced Venn diagram (UpSet) results for the transcriptome data from the four comparisons (CK vs. Eth2, CK vs. Eth4, CK vs. Eth8, and CK vs. Eth24).
Figure 4KEGG pathway classification map of the DEGs. (A) CK vs. Eth2; (B) CK vs. Eth4; (C) CK vs. Eth8; (D) CK vs. Eth24.
Figure 5Volcano plots of differentially expressed genes in TKS. (A) CK vs. Eth2; (B) CK vs. Eth4; (C) CK vs. Eth8; (D) CK vs. Eth24.
Figure 6Gene ontology (GO) functional classifications of DEGs. (A) CK vs. Eth2; (B) CK vs. Eth4; (C) CK vs. Eth8; (D). CK vs. Eth24.
Ultra-performance liquid chromatography analytical conditions.
| Variables | Parameters |
|---|---|
| Column | ACQUITY UPLC® HSS T3 (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm, Waters) |
| Solvent system | Mobile phase A (5 mM ammonium formate in water) |
| Mobile phase B (5 mM ammonium formate in acetonitrile) | |
| Gradient program | 0~1 min, 2% B |
| Flow rate | 0.25 mL/min |
| Column temperature | 40 °C |
| Injection volume | 2 μL |