| Literature DB >> 35684407 |
Zoya Allambergenova1, Martyna Kasela2, Grzegorz Adamczuk3, Ewelina Humeniuk3, Magdalena Iwan4, Łukasz Świątek5, Anastazja Boguszewska5, Barbara Rajtar5, Aleksandra Józefczyk6, Tomasz Baj6, Krzysztof Kamil Wojtanowski6, Dmitry Korulkin7, Kaldanay Kozhanova1, Liliya Ibragimova1, Zuriyadda Sakipova8, Katarzyna Tyśkiewicz9, Anna Malm2, Krystyna Skalicka-Woźniak10.
Abstract
The composition of the ethanolic extract from the aerial parts of Crocus alatavicus Regel & Semen from southern Kazakhstan spontaneous flora was analyzed together with the determination of its antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and anticancer activity. The phytochemical profile analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-quadrupole-time of flight-mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-QTOF-MS) revealed the presence of multiple kaempferol derivatives. High-performance reverse-phase liquid chromatography combined with a photodiode-array detection (RP-HPLC/PDA) found that kaempferol 3-O-dihexoside and kaempferol 3-O-acyltetrahexoside accounted for 70.5% of the kaempferol derivatives. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the extract for all the tested reference microorganisms were high, reaching 10 mg/mL for yeasts and 20 mg/mL for bacteria. In contrast, antiviral activity was observed at 2 mg/mL, resulting in the inhibition of the HSV-1-induced cytopathic effect and the reduction in virus infectious titer by 1.96 log, as well as the viral load by 0.85 log. Among the tested prostate cancer cell lines, significant cytotoxic activity of the extract was noted only on the LNCaP cell line, with an IC50 value of 1.95 mg/mL. The LNCaP cell line treated with 2 mg/mL of the extract showed a noticeably reduced number of spindle-shaped cells with longer cellular projections, a significant increase in the peak corresponding to the population of apoptotic cells in the sub-G1 phase and a decreased intracellular glutathione (GSH) level, suggesting the prooxidative properties of the extract. The obtained data provide novel information about the flavonoids present in the aerial part of C. alatavicus and suggest its potential application as a source of the compounds active against HSV-1 and metastatic, androgen-sensitive prostate cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Crocus alatavicus Regel & Semen; HSV-1; anticancer activity; antiviral activity; kaempferol derivatives; prostate cancer; spontaneous flora of Kazakhstan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35684407 PMCID: PMC9182240 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27113468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Base peak chromatogram of Crocus alatavicus (CA) extract by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-quadrupole-time of flight-mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-QTOF-MS).
Chromatographic data of compounds identified by HPLC/ESI-QTOF-MS in CA extract.
| No | Compound | Retention Time (min) | Formula | Molecular Ion [M − H]− | Fragmentation Ions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Gluconic acid | 1.917 | C6H12O7 | 195.0512 | 177.0421; 129.0195; 99.0094; 75.0095 |
| 2. | Malic acid | 2.041 | C4H6O5 | 133.0145 | 115.0043; 71.0148 |
| 3. | 2-Deoxy-2,3-dehydro-n-acetyl- | 2.273 | C11H17NO8 | 290.0891 | 200.0561; 170.0454; 128.0352 |
| 4. | Citric acid | 2.459 | C₆H₈O₇ | 191.0200 | 129.0191; 111.0091; 87.0095 |
| 5. | DH-Crocusatin F | 4.994 | C10H16O4 | 199.0973 | 155.1072; 137.0969; 125.0977; 111.0821 |
| 6. | Crocusatin F | 5.864 | C10H14O4 | 197.0840 | 153.0939; 137.0985; 125.0987; 111.0831 |
| 7. | Kaempferol 7- | 12.109 | C39H50O26 | 933.2560 | 771.1928; 609.1475; 446.0885; 284.0339 |
| 8. | Kaempferol 3- | 12.799 | C43H54O26 | 973.2846 | 771.2038; 609.1481; 446.0870; 284.0340 |
| 9. | 2,4,4-Trimethyl-3-formyl-6-hydroxy-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-one | 13.029 | C10H12O3 | 179.0722 | 135.0801; 120.0578; 109.0305 |
| 10. | Kaempferol 7- | 16.973 | C27H30O16 | 609.1454 | 447.0840; 285.0351 |
| 11. | Kaempferol 7- | 20.847 | C33H40O21 | 771.1996 | 447.0847; 285.0373 |
| 12. | Quercetin 3- | 20.997 | C27H30O17 | 625.1438 | 300.0292; 271.0247 |
| 13. | Kaempferol 3,7-rutinoside, dihexoside | 21.331 | C39H50O25 | 917.2568 | 771.1673; 755.1738; 609.1419; 593.1419; 285.0337; 284.0281 |
| 14. | Kaempferol 3- | 22.335 | C27H30O16 | 609.1470 | 284.0335; 255.0297 |
| 15. | Rutoside | 23.172 | C27H30O16 | 609.1486 | 300.0269; 284.0319; 271.0245 |
| 16. | Kaempferol 7- | 24.677 | C27H30O15 | 593.1540 | 285.0372 |
| 17. | Astragalin | 25.514 | C21H20O11 | 447.0944 | 284.0322; 255.0299; 227.0343; 151.0036 |
| 18. | Nicotiflorin | 26.267 | C27H30O15 | 593.1479 | 284.0311; 255.0292 |
| 19. | Carboxyvanilic acid | 27.609 | C9H8O6 | 211.0240 | 167.0353; 123.0454; 108.0227 |
| 20. | Kaempferol | 34.420 | C15H10O6 | 285.0425 | 229.0476; 185.0605; 135.0077; 109.0288 |
| 21. | Endocrocin | 35.119 | C16H10O7 | 313.0379 | 241.0506; 225.0565; 213.0555; 201.0576; 197.0604 |
| 22. | Acacetin | 42.691 | C16H12O5 | 283.0614 | 268.0382; 240.0433; 212.0482 |
Flavonoid content in CA extract.
| Compound | Retention Time (min) | Content (μg/mg Dry Extract) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaempferol 3- | 2.11 | 14.14 | 0.09 a | 0.6 b |
| Kaempferol 3- | 2.47 | 80.04 | 0.51 a | 0.6 b |
| Kaempferol 7- | 9.10 | 9.32 | 0.22 a | 2.4 b |
| Quercetin 3- | 9.40 | 6.89 | 0.07 a | 1.0 b |
| Kaempferol 3,7–rutinoside, dihexoside | 9.54 | 10.51 | 0.09 a | 0.9 b |
| Kaempferol 3- | 12.77 | 150.76 | 0.16 a | 0.1 b |
| Rutoside | 13.50 | 5.12 | 0.04 a | 0.7 b |
| Kaempferol 7- | 13.97 | 4.71 | 0.10 a | 2.2 b |
| Astragalin | 14.47 | 26.87 | 0.25 a | 0.9 b |
| Nicotiflorin | 15.83 | 30.83 | 0.26 a | 0.9 b |
| TOTAL (μg/mg dry extract) | 339.19 | |||
a SD—standard deviation (n = 3); b RSD—relative standard deviation.
The activity of CA extract towards bacterial and fungal reference strains.
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 | >20 | Nd 4 | |
| 20 | 20 | 1 | |
| 20 | 20 | 1 | |
| 20 | >20 | Nd | |
| 20 | 20 | 1 | |
| 20 | 20 | 1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 | 10 | 1 | |
| 10 | 20 | 2 |
1 Minimal inhibitory concentration, 2 minimal bactericidal concentration, 3 minimal fungicidal concentration, 4 not determined.
Figure 2The influence of CA extract on HSV-1 or CVB3-induced cytopathic effect (CPE) formation in infected VERO cells; (A,C) non-infected VERO cells, (B) HSV-1 induced CPE in VERO cells, (D) CVB3 induced CPE in VERO cells, the influence of CA extract 2 mg/mL (E) and 1 mg/mL (F) on HSV-1 induced CPE in VERO cells, the influence of CA extract 2 mg/mL (G) and 1 mg/mL (H) on CVB3 induced CPE in VERO cells. (Magnification × 100).
Figure 3Endpoint dilution assays of CVB3 and HSV-1 titers in samples treated with CA extract.
Reduction in infectious titer and viral load by the CA extract.
| Concentration (mg/mL) | Reduction in Infectious Titer (Δlog) 1 | Reduction in Viral Load | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVB3 | HSV-1 | CVB3 | HSV-1 | |
| 2 | 1.14 ± 0.38 | 1.96 ± 0.28 | Nd 3 | 0.85 ± 0.10 |
| 1 | 0.55 ± 0.31 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | nd | 0.24 ± 0.07 |
1 Δlog (mean ± SD)—mean was calculated from titration assays of samples from different antiviral assays; Δlog = logCCID50VC—logCCID50E; VC—virus control; E—tested extract, Δlog of at least 3 is regarded as significant; 2 Δlog’ (mean ± SD)—mean was calculated from samples from different antiviral assays; Δlog’ = log(copies/mL)VC—log(copies/mL)E; VC—virus control; E—tested extract; 3 not determined.
Figure 4Skin fibroblast cell line (BJ) and three prostate cancer cell lines (PC-3, DU145 and LNCaP) viability (% of control) based on the MTT assay treated with CA extract. The cells were treated with an extract in a wide range of concentrations (2–0.1 mg/mL) or DMSO as a vehicle in control cultures for 48 h. The values were presented as mean ± SD derived from three independent experiments. * p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5LNCaP cell morphology treated with CA extract or DMSO as a vehicle in control cultures for 48 h. They were analyzed using a phase-contrast microscope, Nikon Eclipse Ti. (Magnification × 100).
Figure 6(A) Cell cycle analysis in LNCaP cells by image cytometry. The LNCaP cells were treated with 2 mg/mL of CA extract or DMSO as a vehicle in control cultures for 48 h. Data were presented as mean ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control. (B) Representative histograms (M1—subG1, M2—G1, M3—S, M4—G2/M phase).
Figure 7(A) Detection of cell apoptosis in LNCaP cells by image cytometry (Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide staining). The LNCaP cells were treated with 2 mg/mL of CA extract or DMSO as a vehicle in control cultures for 48 h. Data were presented as mean ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control. (B) Representative histograms (Q1II—live, Q1Ir—early apoptotic, Q1ur—late apoptotic, and Q1uI—necrotic cells).
Figure 8(A) Detection of the level of cellular thiols in LNCaP cells by image cytometry. The LNCaP cells were treated with 2 mg/mL of CA extract or DMSO as a vehicle in control cultures for 48 h. Data were presented as mean ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control. (B) Representative histograms (Q1II—PI negative cells with decreased GSH level, Q1Ir—healthy cells, Q1ur—dead cells).