| Literature DB >> 35684179 |
Ali Reza Yousefi1, Asadollah Ahmadikhah2, Reza Fotovat1, Leila Rohani1, Foad Soheily1, Daniela Letizia Uberti3, Andrea Mastinu3.
Abstract
A species of Orobanche was observed on spiny cocklebur (Xanthium spinosum) for the first time in Iran and tentatively was named IR-Iso.This study was conducted to make a phylogenetic analysis of the Orobanche using 5.8S rRNA region sequences, and also to better understand its sequence pattern. The full-length ITS1-ITS2 region of the new Orobanche isolate was PCR-amplified from the holoparasitic plant parasitizing X. spinosum. Sequences of the amplicons from the isolate were 100% identical but differed by 5.6-6.7% from most homologous GenBank accessions to 37.9% divergence from distant species. The analysis of the molecular variance showed that variation between-population (61.9%, SE = 0.04) was larger than within-population. Neighbor-joining analysis placed the Iranian isolate in the same clade as most of the Orobanche and Phelipanche species. The isolate was more closely related to Orobanche aegyptiaca (from China), and this was confirmed by using a structure analysis. However, complementary analyses showed that the Iranian isolate has a unique nucleotide substitution pattern, and hence it was considered as an ecotype of O. aegyptiaca (ecotype Alborzica). In this paper we report on the association between this new ecotype of Orobanche and X. spinosum.Entities:
Keywords: 5.8S rRNA; Orobanche aegyptiaca; phylogeny; xanthium
Year: 2022 PMID: 35684179 PMCID: PMC9182829 DOI: 10.3390/plants11111406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1(A) The infection of a spiny cocklebur (Xanthium spinosum L.) by the collected broomrape (Orobanche sp.) from Iran. (B) Orobanche isolate detached from the roots of the host plant.
Sequences showing similarity to IR-Iso ecotype after haplotype analysis.
| ID | Accession Number | Scientific Name | Origin | Host Plant | IR-ISO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IR-Iso | Iran | Spiny cocklebur | 100.0 | |
| 2 | AY209326 |
| Georgia | - | 94.46 |
| 3 | AY960742 | Turkey | 94.30 | ||
| 4 | EU581788 |
| Spain | - | 94.30 |
| 5 | EU581777 |
| Spain | - | 94.30 |
| 6 | KC811184 |
| China | Tomato | 94.41 |
| 7 | EU581785 |
| Spain | - | 94.14 |
| 8 | EU581775 |
| Spain | - | 94.14 |
| 9 | AY209332 | Turkey | - | 94.14 | |
| 10 | KC811199 |
| China | Pumpkin | 94.24 |
| 11 | KC811218 |
| China | Tomato | 94.08 |
| 12 | KC811209 |
| China | Tomato | 94.08 |
| 13 | KC811208 |
| China | Tomato | 94.08 |
| 14 | KC811183 |
| China | Tomato | 94.08 |
| 15 | KC811180 |
| China | Chili | 94.08 |
| 16 | EU581766 | Spain | - | 93.81 | |
| 17 | KC811177 |
| China | Watermelon | 93.91 |
| 18 | EU581745 | Spain | - | 93.65 | |
| 19 | KC811166 |
| China | Tomato | 93.77 |
| 20 | EU581721 | Spain | - | 93.34 | |
| 21 | KF359504 |
| Russia | - | 77.37 |
| 22 | EU817103 |
| Slovenia | - | 77.31 |
| 23 | AY209260 |
| Croatia | - | 77.07 |
| 24 | AY209240 |
| Morocco | - | 76.42 |
| 25 | AY209282 |
| Turkey | - | 93.65 |
| 26 | EU581738 |
| France | - | 76.97 |
| 27 | AY209257 |
| Georgia | - | 76.26 |
| 28 | AY209234 |
| Jordan | - | 88.47 |
| 29 | AY209309 |
| Germany | - | 76.19 |
| 30 | EU655623 |
| France | - | 77.13 |
Figure 2Nucleotide compositions of the 30 haplotype sequences in data set.
Maximum composite likelihood estimate of the pattern of nucleotide substitution.
| A | T | C | G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | - |
|
|
|
| T |
| - |
|
|
| C |
|
| - |
|
| G |
|
|
| - |
Note: Each entry shows the probability of substitution (r) from one base (row) to another base (column) [17]. For simplicity, the sum of r values is made equal to 100. Rates of different transitional substitutions are shown in bold and those of transversional substitutions are shown in italics.
Figure 3The unrooted tree of nuclear 5.8S rRNA sequences of Orobanchaceae reconstructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method considering O. anatolica as outgroup. Numbers at the nodes represent the bootstrap values over 50%. Iranian isolate (IR-Iso) is shown in green.
Figure 4Bayesian-based clustering of the same individuals assigned to two groups by Mega 6. Real number of groups determined by Evanno et al. (2005) method (top). Graphical representation of the assignment of each individual to one of two red or green groups (bottom). Numbers in parenthesis on horizontal axis are group numbers determined by Mega 6.
Tajima’s test statistics for the 5.8S rRNAplus ITS sequences of Orobanche.
| m | n | S | ps | θ | π | D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | 8 | 579 | 126 | 0.218 | 0.084 | 0.069 | −0.945 |
| Group II | 22 | 584 | 147 | 0.252 | 0.069 | 0.026 | −2.556 |
| Overall | 30 | 560 | 212 | 0.3791 | 0.096 | 0.088 | −0.304 |
m = number of sequences; n = total number of sites; S = Number of segregating sites; ps = S/n; θ (functional coefficient of divergence) = ps/α1; π = nucleotide diversity; D = the Tajima’s test statistic (Tajima, 1989).
Figure 5Map showing the region where material was collected in Karaj, Alborz Province, Iran.