| Literature DB >> 35683958 |
Meiyan Wu1, Wangfang Deng1, Yidong Zhang1,2, Chao Chen1, Zhexuan Liu1, Pedram Fatehi3, Bin Li1.
Abstract
It is highly desirable to develop a safe, highly efficient, and biodegradable drug carrier with an enhanced drug transport efficiency. Cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) and chitosan (CS) composite hydrogels are promising candidate carriers with biological compatibility and non-cytotoxicity. Herein, the CNF/CS composite beads were prepared by dissolving cellulose and CS in LiBr molten salt hydrate and regenerating in ethanol. This preparation method is facile and efficient, and the obtained porous CNF/CS beads with the weight ratio of 8:2 exhibited a large specific surface area, uniform micro-nano-sized pores, strong mechanical property, and water absorption-resistance. Moreover, these beads as drug (tetracycline hydrochloride, TH) carriers showed a higher encapsulation efficiency (47.4%) at the TH concentration of 5 mg/mL in 24 h, and a higher drug loading rate (12.0%) than pure CNF and other CNF/CS beads prepared with different ratios. In addition, the TH releasing behavior of CNF/CS (8:2) beads fitted well into the zero-order, first-order, and Higuchi models under an acid condition, indicating that the drug release of these pH-sensitive beads was mainly affected by drug concentration under an acid condition. Therefore, these CNF/CS beads have great potential to be used as drug carriers for medical applications.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose nanofibrils; chitosan; drug carrier; drug release; tetracycline hydrochloride
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683958 PMCID: PMC9182576 DOI: 10.3390/polym14112286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1The technical route of this work.
Figure 2(a) Digital images of regenerated CNF beads and CNF/CS composite beads; (b) Freeze-dried CNF and CNF/CS beads; (c) SEM images of CNF and CNF/CS beads.
Characterization parameters of the obtained beads.
| Sample | Nanofiber Diameter (nm) | BET Surface Area (m2/g) | Pore Volume (cm3/g) | Pore Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNF beads | 31.8 ± 6.0 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 0.0122 ± 0.012 | 17.5 ± 1.1 |
| CNF/CS beads (9:1) | 16.5 ± 3.1 | 9.2 ± 0.1 | 0.0299 ± 0.009 | 13.3 ± 1.3 |
| CNF/CS beads (8:2) | 21.3 ± 3.4 | 17.9 ± 0.2 | 0.0541 ± 0.010 | 12.2 ± 1.2 |
| CNF/CS beads (7:3) | 24.7 ± 5.2 | 11.3 ± 0.1 | 0.0540 ± 0.011 | 16.0 ± 1.2 |
Figure 3FTIR spectra (a) and XRD patterns (b) of raw materials and the obtained beads; Swelling ratio (c) and mass loss ratio (d) of CNF and CNF/CS beads; Compressive stress (e) and compression modulus (f) of CNF and CNF/CS beads.
Figure 4Drug encapsulation efficiency (a) and drug loading ratio (b) of CNF and CNF/CS gel beads at the TH concentration of 5 mg/mL; Drug encapsulation efficiency (c) and drug loading ratio (d) of CNF/CS beads (8:2) at different TH concentrations.
Figure 5Release curves of CNF and CNF/CS beads under pH = 5 (a) and pH = 7 (b), the insert image is a standard concentration curve of TH.
Figure 6Linear fitting curves of and (a), and time t (b), and t/2 (c) under acid and neutral conditions.