| Literature DB >> 35683260 |
Ali Ahmed1, Safeer Abbas1, Wasim Abbass1, Ayesha Waheed1, Afia Razzaq2, Elimam Ali3,4, Ahmed Farouk Deifalla5.
Abstract
The continuous development of the marble industry has led to an increase in the accumulation of waste marble sludge causing landfilling and health-associated issues. The intention of the current study is to explore the potential of waste marble sludge powder (MS) utilization as a means of controlling alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in concrete. Specimen (cubes, prisms, and mortar bars) were prepared to incorporate reactive aggregates and various proportions of MS ranging from 5% to 40% as a replacement for aggregates. Expansion and mechanical strength characteristics were determined to investigate the effectiveness of MS to control ASRfor up to 150 days. Results revealed that on replacing aggregates in the control specimen with 25% MS, the ASR expansion at 14 days reduced from 0.23% to 0.17%, and the expansion at 28 days reduced from 0.28% to 0.17% which is within limits as per American Standard for Testing of Materials (ASTM) C1260. Furthermore, specimens incorporating MS exhibited improved compressive and flexural strength as compared to the identical specimen without MS. Microstructural analysis using Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed micro-cracks in the control specimen while the specimen incorporating MS was found intact. Thus, it can be foreseen that the use of MS as a partial replacement of aggregates can control ASR in concrete as well as reduce the dumping and harmful emissions issue.Entities:
Keywords: alkali silica reaction; concrete; durability; expansion; reactive aggregates; waste marble sludge
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683260 PMCID: PMC9182040 DOI: 10.3390/ma15113962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Various proportions of MS used for preparing specimens.
| Serial No. | Designation | Percentage Replacement by |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | - |
| 2 | MS5 | 5 |
| 3 | MS10 | 10 |
| 4 | MS15 | 15 |
| 5 | MS20 | 20 |
| 6 | MS25 | 25 |
| 7 | MS30 | 30 |
| 8 | MS40 | 40 |
MS: Marble Sludge; mixture proportion (cement:aggregate = 1:2.25).
Figure 1Specimens prepared (a) mortar cubes (50 × 50 × 50 mm) and prisms (40 × 40 × 160 mm) (b) mortar bars (25 × 25 × 285 mm).
Composition of cement and MS (chemical analysis).
| Constituents (%) | Cement | ASTM Limits (Cement) | MS |
|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 20.85 | 17–25 | 1.03 |
| Al2O3 | 2.49 | 3–8 | 0.93 |
| Fe2O3 | 3.21 | 0.5–6.0 | 0.07 |
| CaO | 62.08 | 60–67 | 54.4 |
| MgO | 1.96 | 0.5–4.0 | 0.55 |
| SO3 | 3.48 | 2.0–3.5 | - |
| Na2O | 0.10 | - | 0.07 |
| K2O | 0.74 | - | 0.10 |
| Na2Oe | 0.58 | <0.6 | 0.13 |
| LOI | 2.78 | <3.0 | 42.98 |
| IR | 0.43 | <0.75 | - |
| C3S | 71.58 | 42–67 | - |
| C2S | 2.23 | 8–31 | - |
| C3A | 8.4 | 5–14 | - |
| C4AF | 9.66 | 6–12 | - |
| LSF | 1.00 | 0.66–1.02 | - |
| SR | 2.27 | 2.0–2.5 | - |
| AR | 1.64 | 1.5–2.5 | - |
Figure 2SEM and XRD patterns of raw materials (a) SEM image of cement (b) SEM image of MS (c) XRD pattern of cement (d) XRD pattern of MS.
Physical properties of raw materials (cement and MS).
| Properties | Cement | ASTM Limits (Cement) | MS | Standards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific gravity | 3.15 | 3.10–3.25 | 2.64 | ASTM C188 |
| Unit weight (kg/m3) | 1400 | 830–1650 | 1206 | ASTM C29 |
| Fineness (Passing 200 sieve) (%) | 90 | >90 | 100 | ASTM C204 |
| Blaine fineness (cm2/g) | 2200 | 2250 | 2237 | ASTM C184 |
| Autoclave expansion (%) | 0.13 | 0.20 | - | ASTM C151 |
| Standard consistency (%) | 24.6 | - | - | ASTM C187 |
| Initial setting time (Min) | 120 | >45 | - | ASTM C191 |
| Final setting time (Min) | 230 | <375 | - | ASTM C191 |
Chemical and physical properties of aggregates used in mixtures.
| Tests/Description | Results (%) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Water-soluble chloride content (BS 812-117) | 0.043 |
| Sulfate content (BS 812-118) | 0.014 |
| Soundness by weighted average loss (Na2SO4), (ASTM C88) | 4.658 |
| Soundness by weighted average loss (MgSO4), (ASTM C88) | 5.270 |
| Calcium oxide (CaO) | 9.890 |
| Magnesium oxide (MgO) | 10.320 |
| Loss on ignition (LOI) | 15.400 |
| Silica (SiO2) | 56.920 |
| Alkali metals | 0.379 |
| Ferric oxide (Fe2O3) | 1.767 |
| Chromium oxide | 0.038 |
| Alumina (Al2O3) | 5.233 |
|
| |
| Bulk Density (kg/m3) (ASTM C29) | 1307.42 |
| Specific Gravity (ASTM C188) | 2.6 |
| Water Absorption (%) | 2.2 |
| Impact Value (%) (BS 812) | 22.31% |
| Abrasion Test (%) (ASTM C535) | 22.30% |
Figure 3Petrographic examination of aggregates (* reactive components).
Figure 4Compressive strength results.
Figure 5Flexural strength results.
Figure 6Expansion results (a) at all ages (b) at 14 days and 28 days with ASTM limits.
Figure 7Effect of ASR on MS mortar specimens (a) compressive strength reduction due to ASR (b) (a) flexural strength reduction due to ASR.
Figure 8Thermal analysis results of Samples incorporating various dosages of MS (a) heatflow and (b) weight loss.
Figure 9SEM images of specimens with varying percentages of MS (a) control specimen (50 μm) (b) 10% MS (50 μm) (c) 40% MS (100 μm) (d) 40% MS (50 μm).