| Literature DB >> 35683180 |
Haiqin Duan1, Fei Yang1, Xinmin Shen1, Qin Yin1, Enshuai Wang1, Xiaonan Zhang1, Xiaocui Yang2,3, Cheng Shen3, Wenqiang Peng4.
Abstract
Acoustic metamaterials based on Helmholtz resonance have perfect sound absorption characteristics with the subwavelength size, but the absorption bandwidth is narrow, which limits the practical applications for noise control with broadband. On the basis of the Fabry-Perot resonance principle, a novel sound absorber of the acoustic metamaterial by parallel connection of the multiple spiral chambers (abbreviated as MSC-AM) is proposed and investigated in this research. Through the theoretical modeling, finite element simulation, sample preparation and experimental validation, the effectiveness and practicability of the MSC-AM are verified. Actual sound absorption coefficients of the MSC-AM in the frequency range of 360-680 Hz (with the bandwidth Δf1 = 320 Hz) are larger than 0.8, which exhibit the extraordinarily low-frequency sound absorption performance. Moreover, actual sound absorption coefficients are above 0.5 in the 350-1600 Hz range (with a bandwidth Δf2 = 1250 Hz), which achieve broadband sound absorption in the low-middle frequency range. According to various actual demands, the structural parameters can be adjusted flexibly to realize the customization of sound absorption bandwidth, which provides a novel way to design and improve acoustic metamaterials to reduce the noise with various frequency bands and has promising prospects of application in low-frequency sound absorption.Entities:
Keywords: Fabry–Perot resonance; acoustic metamaterial; finite element simulation; low-frequency sound absorption; multiple spiral chambers; noise control
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683180 PMCID: PMC9181907 DOI: 10.3390/ma15113882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the MSC-AM structure. (a) 3D model of the structure; (b) 3D model of a single spiral chamber; (c) 2D sketch of the structure section.
Summary of the utilized constants in the theoretical model for the MSC-AM.
| Parameters | Symbol | Unit | Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acoustic velocity of the air |
| m/s | 343 |
| Density of the air |
|
| 1.21 |
| Standard atmospheric pressure |
| Pa | 1.01325 × 105 |
| dynamic viscosity coefficient |
|
| 1.8 × 10−5 |
| thermal conductivity |
|
| 0.0258 |
| specific heat capacity at the constant volume |
|
| 718 |
| specific heat ratio of the air |
| - | 1.4 |
Figure 2Finite element simulation analysis and experimental validation of sound absorption performance of the MSC-AM. (a) Finite element simulation model of the MSC-AM; (b) the prepared experimental sample for the MSC-AM; (c) schematic diagram of the AWA6290T standing wave tube tester.
Figure 3Distribution of the sound absorption coefficients of the MSC-AM in theory.
Figure 4Distribution of the sound absorption coefficients in the MSC-AM in simulation.
Figure 5Distributions of the sound pressure level (SPL) of MSC-AM within resonance frequency points in simulation.
Figure 6Contrast of the sound absorption coefficient and the phase delay in the MSC-AM, in which the dashed lines represent the curves of phase delay of the single spiral chamber, the solid lines represent the curves of sound absorption coefficient of the single spiral chamber, and the dot-dashed lines represent the curves of total sound absorption of the MSC-AM, respectively.
Figure 7Comparisons of the actual sound absorption coefficients of the MSC-AM with those in theory and those in simulation.