| Literature DB >> 35683134 |
Xudong Zhao1, Ni Yao2, Xianghua Zhang1,3, Lei Zhang2,4, Guangming Tao5, Zijian Li1, Quan Liu1, Xiujian Zhao1, Yinsheng Xu1.
Abstract
Evanescent wave absorption-based mid-infrared chalcogenide fiber sensors have prominent advantages in multicomponent liquid and gas detection. In this work, a new approach of tapered-fiber geometry optimization was proposed, and the evanescent efficiency was also theoretically calculated to evaluate sensing performance. The influence of fiber geometry (waist radius (Rw), taper length (Lt), waist deformation) on the mode distribution, light transmittance (T), evanescent proportion (TO) and evanescent efficiency (τ) is discussed. Remarkably, the calculated results show that the evanescent efficiency can be over 10% via optimizing the waist radius and taper length. Generally, a better sensing performance based on tapered fiber can be achieved if the proportion of the LP11-like mode becomes higher or Rw becomes smaller. Furthermore, the radius of the waist boundary (RL) was introduced to analyze the waist deformation. Mode proportion is almost unchanged as the RL increases, while τ is halved. In addition, the larger the micro taper is, the easier the taper process is. Herein, a longer waist can be obtained, resulting in larger sensing area which increases sensitivity greatly.Entities:
Keywords: evanescent wave; evanescent wave efficiency; sensor; tapered fiber
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683134 PMCID: PMC9181228 DOI: 10.3390/ma15113834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Mathematical model for numerical simulation.
Figure 2Experimental setup for the chalcogenide fiber tapering.
Figure 3Calculation of the fractional power inside the fiber. A1 and B1 refer to the plane of core and cladding, respectively. A2 and B2 refer to the volume of liquid and core, respectively.
Figure 4Schematic of the modal evolution in the transition region with (a) Rw = 1 μm; (b) Rw = 2 μm; (c) Rw = 3 μm; (d) Rw = 5 μm; (e) calculated modes proportion; (f) light transmittance, evanescent power ratio, evanescent efficiency in the waist with different Rw.
Calculated light transmittance T, evanescent power ratio To, evanescent efficiency τ.
| Mode Evolution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | single mode → multimode → single mode | 42.91 | 7.85 | 3.87 |
| 2 | single mode → multimode → multimode | 76.62 | 7.09 | 5.43 |
| 3 | single mode → multimode → multimode | 83.78 | 5.01 | 4.20 |
| 5 | single mode → multimode → multimode | 98.72 | 1.67 | 1.65 |
Figure 5Calculated electric field in the waist as (a) Rw = 1.45 μm and (b) 2 μm; calculated modes proportion, light transmittance, evanescent power ratio, evanescent efficiency with different Lt as Rw fixed to (c) 1.45 μm and (d) 2 μm; calculated (e) modes proportion; (f) light transmittance, evanescent power ratio, evanescent efficiency in the waist as Rw is fixed at 4 μm.
Figure 6Calculated (a) fundamental mode proportion; (b) LP11-like mode proportion; (c) light transmittance; (d) evanescent proportion; (e) evanescent efficiency with different Lt as Rw changes from 1.5 to 1.61 μm; (f) calculated evanescent efficiency with different Rw as Lt changes from 0.38 to 0.46 mm.
Figure 7(a) Mathematical model; (b) calculated modes proportion; and (c) light transmittance, evanescent proportion and evanescent efficiency with different RL.