| Literature DB >> 35683043 |
Khalid Ahmed Owaid1, Ammar Ahmed Hamdoon1, Rand Raad Maty2, Mohanad Yakdhan Saleh1, M A Abdelzaher3.
Abstract
The hazards of plastic waste (PW) from polymers (e.g., polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), nylon, polystyrene (PS), etc.), the mechanism of its spread in general, and its ubiquity in our daily lives as a continuously and/or frequently expelled product are a crisis of the twenty-first century, as reported by the United Nations in 2019, especially after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. This research included the process of modifying the rheological properties of asphalt to obtain asphalt suitable for use in a high-humidity atmosphere. The Iraqi climate is characterized by heat that reaches the point of harshness in the summer and coldness that falls below zero on some winter days. From this point of view, our recent study focuses mainly on making rheological and chemical modifications to asphalt using spent polymeric materials and used lubricating oils (ULO), thus achieving two important goals, namely obtaining asphalt with rheological properties resistant to the Iraqi atmosphere as well as eliminating both solid and liquid environmental pollutants. The microstructure and morphology of the designed patches were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to indicate phase composition.Entities:
Keywords: ULO; asphalt; microstructure; polymers; rheological properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35683043 PMCID: PMC9181618 DOI: 10.3390/ma15113744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Accumulation of PW vs. ULO in tons throughout the Iraq’s governorates.
Technical specification of ethylene–vinyl acetate and polyvinyl chloride (as received).
| Specification | Ethylene–Vinyl Acetate | Polyvinyl Chloride |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 86.09 | 233.00 |
| Bulk density | 0.93 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.02 |
| Specific gravity | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| Degree of polymerization | 75–95%. | 1000 ± 50 |
| Melting point °C | 88 | - |
| K-Value | - | 66 |
Rheological properties of Iraqi paving asphalt vs. the standard testing measurements (JTG E20,2011).
| Rheological Properties | Iraqi Paving | The Stander Testing Measurements (JTG E20,2011) [ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | |
| Softening point (%) | 54 | 60 | 60 | 54 | 65 | 60 |
| Penetration (100 gm, 5 s, 25 °C) | 40 | 50 | 43 | 20 | 40 | 30 |
| Degree of Ductility (cm 25 °C) | 10 | - | 11 | 15 | - | 15 |
Properties of bitumen binder AH#70.
| Rheological Properties | Minimu | Maximum | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Softening point (°C) | 57 | 66 | 60 |
| Penetration (100 gm 5 s 25 °C) | 18 | 40 | 28 |
| Degree of Ductility (cm, 25 °C) | 10 | - | 11 |
Mix composition of PW and ULO-modified asphalt patches.
| Mix Title | Mix Composition | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AH#70 Asphalt | PW and ULO Replacement by a Fixed Ratio (1:1:1) | Sulfur Addition | Temp. | |
| AS | 100.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 180 °C |
| AS-1 | 99.0 | 1.0 | ||
| AS-2 | 98.0 | 2.0 | ||
| AS-3 | 97.0 | 3.0 | ||
| AS-4 | 96.0 | 4.0 | ||
| AS-5 | 95.0 | 5.0 | ||
| AS-6 | 94.0 | 6.0 | ||
Figure 2Scientific diagram of practical work.
Conventional properties of PW and ULO-modified asphalt pastes.
| Mix Title | Conventional Properties | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ductility | Softening Point | Penetration | Penetration | Asphaltens | |
| AS | >150 | 50 | 44.3 | −1.461 | 20.1 |
| AS-1 | >150 | 54 | 41.5 | −0.670 | 23.1 |
| AS-2 | >150 | 57 | 41.9 | −0.004 | 25.3 |
| AS-3 | >150 | 56 | 42.1 | −0.625 | 25.8 |
| AS-4 | >150 | 58 | 41.8 | +0.196 | 26.5 |
| AS-5 | 133 | 59 | 40.7 | +0.337 | 29.2 |
| AS-6 | 67 | 65 | 37.3 | +1.032 | 31.2 |
Figure 3Conventional properties of PW and ULO-modified asphalt pastes.
Figure 4Penetration (0.1 mm) of PW and ULO-modified asphalt pastes.
Temperature sweep of PW and ULO-modified asphalt pastes.
| Mix Title | Aging of Temp. Sweep | Rheological Properties | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ductility (cm) | Softening Point | Penetration | Penetration Index | Weight Loss | ||
| AS | Before | >150 | 50 | 44.3 | −1.461 | - |
| After | >150 | 54 | 42.4 | −0.618 | 0.062 | |
| AS-1 | Before | >150 | 57 | 41.9 | −0.004 | - |
| After | >150 | 58 | 41.4 | +0.174 | 0.041 | |
| AS-2 | Before | >150 | 57 | 42.1 | −0.625 | - |
| After | >150 | 58 | 41.9 | −0.004 | 0.039 | |
| AS-3 | Before | >150 | 56 | 42.1 | −0.625 | - |
| After | >150 | 58 | 41.6 | +0.185 | 0.037 | |
| AS-4 | Before | >150 | 55 | 40.8 | −0.615 | - |
| After | >150 | 58 | 40.3 | +0.144 | 0.031 | |
| AS-6 | Before | >150 | 52 | 39.7 | −0.612 | - |
| After | >150 | 57 | 40.1 | +0.135 | 0.030 | |
Multiple stress and creep recovery of PW and ULO-modified asphalt pastes.
| Mix Title | Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asphalt | Stability (KN) | Crawling (mm) | MQ | |
| AS | 4.5 | 11.7 | 5.20 | 2.25 |
| AS-1 | 16.4 | 3.10 | 5.29 | |
| AS-2 | 11.7 | 2.80 | 6.10 | |
| AS-3 | 14.6 | 3.40 | 4.29 | |
| AS-4 | 7.0 | 2.4 | 2.91 | |
| AS-5 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| AS-6 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| AS * | 7.0 (minimum) | 2.40 | 3.50 | |
* As: Sample Mean.
Figure 5Multiple stress and creep recovery of PW and ULO-modified asphalt samples.
Figure 6FE-SEM and EDX for asphalt (as received).
Figure 7FE-SEM for PW and ULO-modified asphalt samples.
Figure 8FE-SEM and EDX for AS-3 patch.