Literature DB >> 3568303

Cardiovascular effects of verapamil in patients with essential hypertension.

R E Schmieder, F H Messerli, G E Garavaglia, B D Nunez.   

Abstract

The cardiovascular effects of intravenous verapamil and 3 months of oral administration of a slow-release form of verapamil (verapamil-SR) were studied in 10 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Intravenous verapamil reduced arterial pressure by 15% (p less than .01) through a fall in total peripheral resistance of 29% (p less than .01); provoked a reflexive rise in heart rate (by 19%, p less than .02), cardiac output (by 74%, p less than .01), and plasma catecholamines; and shifted intravascular volume toward the cardiopulmonary circulation indicating peripheral venoconstriction. Quite in contrast to the immediate effects of the intravenous drug, oral therapy with verapamil-SR for 2 to 3 months lowered arterial pressure effectively (by 15%, p less than .01) by inducing vasodilation of 15% (p less than .02), but without causing reflex tachycardia, activation of the sympathetic-adrenergic or renin-angiotensin systems, or volume expansion. Oral therapy with verapamil-SR preserved systemic and renal blood flow and slightly reduced cardiac mass (by 6%, p less than .05) and renal vascular resistance (by 25%, p less than .05). Whereas intravenous verapamil tended to depress myocardial contractility, oral verapamil-SR did not at all affect myocardial contractility or left ventricular function. These cardiovascular effects make verapamil-SR an excellent agent for long-term antihypertensive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3568303     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.75.5.1030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

Review 1.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy; what are appropriate therapeutic objectives?

Authors:  D J Sheridan; M P Kingsbury; N A Flores
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Risks versus benefits of withdrawing antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  H P Schobel; R E Schmieder; F H Messerli
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Regression of increased left ventricular mass by antihypertensives.

Authors:  C J Lavie; H O Ventura; F H Messerli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium channel blockers? An overview.

Authors:  H Gavras
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Ventricular performance in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with reduced cardiac mass.

Authors:  T Natsume; M B Kardon; B L Pegram; E D Frohlich
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of tiapamil at rest and during exercise in essential hypertension.

Authors:  P Omvik; P Lund-Johansen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Correction of physiological alterations of hypertension.

Authors:  E D Frohlich
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.727

8.  Hemodynamic effects of Ro 23-6152 in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  H B Folkers; J C van Zwienen; P Boer; C H Kleinbloesem; G G Geyskes
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Effects of treatment with verapamil SR and captopril on the lipid profile of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  M Catalano; C Cislaghi; G Carzaniga; A Aronica; R Seregni; A Libretti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Does a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality?

Authors:  F H Messerli; F Soria
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.