| Literature DB >> 35682329 |
Md Ahshanul Haque1, Barbie Zaman Wahid1, Md Tariqujjaman1, Mansura Khanam1, Fahmida Dil Farzana1, Mohammad Ali1, Farina Naz1, Kazi Istiaque Sanin1, Asg Faruque1, Tahmeed Ahmed1.
Abstract
The adolescence period is considered a life stage worthy of strategic health investments since it is a critical period of physical and neuro-maturational development. Adolescent girls face different health difficulties in that phase of life. Children born to adolescent mothers are at a higher risk of undernutrition. This paper aims to estimate the prevalence of stunting among adolescent mothers and their children in Bangladesh by time period and determine the associated factors of adolescent maternal stunting status. We also sought to establish the relationship between maternal and childhood stunting by comparing the geographical regions in Bangladesh. We derived data from the nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, which was conducted between 2007 and 2017/18. The outcome variables of this study were ever-married adolescent girls' stunting status and their children's stunting status. Interaction analysis between administrative division and maternal stunting status was conducted with childhood stunting as the outcome variable to investigate the impact of maternal stunting status on their children's stunting compared to geographical location. Our results indicated that in comparison to other divisions, the frequency of stunting among children and adolescent mothers was higher in the Sylhet region. It also revealed that children whose mothers were stunted had a 2.36 times increased chance of being stunted. Our study suggests that education for women could help them attain self-sufficiency and, as a result, reduce the prevalence of poor childhood nutrition, especially stunting.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladesh; adolescent; association; stunting
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35682329 PMCID: PMC9180893 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
General characteristics of the participants stratified by round of the BDHS survey.
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Geographical area | ||||
| Barisal | 13.0 (175) | 12.3 (247) | 13.8 (279) | 11.4 (222) |
| Chittagong | 18.3 (247) | 15.6 (313) | 17.6 (356) | 15.7 (307) |
| Dhaka ! | 21.1 (284) | 17.8 (356) | 16.8 (339) | 26.9 (525) |
| Khulna | 15.5 (209) | 15.7 (315) | 13.6 (276) | 13.3 (259) |
| Rajshahi $ | 20.7 (279) | 30.5 (611) | 27.9 (565) | 25.1 (490) |
| Sylhet | 11.4 (154) | 8.1 (162) | 10.3 (208) | 7.6 (148) |
| Place of residence | ||||
| Urban | 30.4 (410) | 30.5 (611) | 31.1 (629) | 31.4 (612) |
| Rural | 69.6 (938) | 69.5 (1393) | 68.9 (1394) | 68.6 (1339) |
| Wealth index | ||||
| Poorest | 14.3 (193) | 16.9 (338) | 19.3 (391) | 21.2 (413) |
| Poorer | 21.7 (293) | 24 (481) | 20.5 (415) | 22.4 (437) |
| Middle | 22.6 (305) | 22.2 (445) | 22.6 (457) | 21 (409) |
| Richer | 21.2 (286) | 22.2 (444) | 22.6 (458) | 20.7 (403) |
| Richest | 20.1 (271) | 14.8 (296) | 14.9 (302) | 14.8 (289) |
| Number of HH members 1 | 6.1 (3.3) | 5.9 (2.9) | 5.8 (2.8) | 5.9 (2.7) |
| Improved toilet | 35.1 (458) | 45.7 (893) | 59.4 (1185) | 52.5 (976) |
| Source of drinking water | 79 (1064) | 81 (1623) | 81 (1636) | 77.3 (1499) |
| Religion | ||||
| Other | 7.2 (97) | 8.8 (177) | 7.3 (147) | 6.0 (116) |
| Muslim | 92.8 (1251) | 91.2 (1827) | 92.7 (1876) | 94.1 (1835) |
| | N = 1328 | N = 1961 | N = 2006 | N = 1917 |
| Height (cm) 1 | 150.4 (6.2) | 150.9 (5.4) | 151.2 (5.6) | 151.3 (5.3) |
| Weight (kg) 1 | 44.9 (7.4) | 45.3 (7.3) | 46.5 (8) | 48 (8.2) |
| Age (years) 1 | 18 (1.3) | 17.9 (1.5) | 18 (1.3) | 18.2 (1.2) |
| Height-for-age z-score 1 | 1.9 (0.9) | 1.8 (0.8) | 1.8 (0.8) | 1.8 (0.8) |
| BMI-for-age z-score 1 | 0.5 (2.6) | 0.6 (0.9) | 0.4 (1) | 0.2 (1.1) |
| Stunting | 43.9 (583) | 39.8 (781) | 38.6 (774) | 38.5 (739) |
| Maternal education | ||||
| No education | 10.7 (144) | 7.2 (145) | 5.2 (105) | 2.3 (45) |
| Primary | 28.4 (383) | 27.4 (550) | 25.6 (517) | 22.2 (434) |
| Secondary | 57.8 (779) | 58.5 (1172) | 59.7 (1208) | 61 (1191) |
| Higher | 3.1 (42) | 6.8 (137) | 9.5 (193) | 14.4 (281) |
| Husband’s education | ||||
| No education | 24 (323) | 16.7 (334) | 13.9 (282) | 11 (214) |
| Primary | 34.5 (465) | 33.7 (676) | 33.1 (669) | 34.4 (672) |
| Secondary | 31.8 (429) | 39.7 (795) | 40.8 (825) | 37.5 (731) |
| Higher | 9.7 (131) | 9.9 (199) | 12.2 (247) | 17.1 (334) |
| Husband’s age 1 | 26.6 (6) | 26.2 (6.1) | 26 (4.7) | 25.9 (4.4) |
| Had the ability to take decisions herself (or jointly with her husband) | ||||
| i. Own health care | 37.5 (506) | 47.4 (925) | 45.8 (907) | 57.1 (1079) |
| ii. Major household purchases | 32 (432) | 39.2 (766) | 37.4 (741) | 43 (814) |
| iii. Visits to her family or relatives | 34.1 (459) | 43.7 (854) | 40.7 (806) | 49.5 (936) |
| All of the three decisions | 18 (242) | 28.8 (563) | 25.9 (513) | 32.7 (618) |
| Attitudes to domestic violence | 64.5 (870) | 67.2 (1346) | 70.2 (1421) | 80.5 (1570) |
| At least four ANC visits from a medically trained provider | 8.6 (116) | 11.4 (229) | 10.7 (216) | 20.1 (393) |
| Use of contraception | 39.2 (529) | 48.2 (966) | 50.3 (1017) | 48.9 (955) |
| Delivery type | ||||
| Caesarean section | 7.5 (56) | 12.4 (128) | 21 (197) | 28.9 (251) |
| Non-caesarean | 92.5 (693) | 87.6 (905) | 79 (742) | 71.1 (618) |
|
| N = 753 | N = 1042 | N = 1061 | N = 987 |
| Child’s age (months)1 | 18.1 (13.5) | 17.6 (14.3) | 17.8 (13.7) | 17.9 (14.1) |
| Child’s sex | ||||
| Male | 49.8 (375) | 52.1 (543) | 51.0 (541) | 52.6 (519) |
| Female | 50.2 (378) | 47.9 (499) | 49.0 (520) | 47.4 (468) |
| Childhood stunting | 36.0 (240) | 40.1 (366) | 35.1 (332) | 32.1 (293) |
! Mymensing division was united with Dhaka. $ Rangpur division was united with Rajshahi. 1 Mean (SD).
Figure 1Stunting prevalence in adolescent mothers stratified by geographical region and round of the BDHS survey.
Figure 2Stunting prevalence in children whose mothers were adolescents was stratified by geographical region and round of the BDHS survey.
Factors associated with the stunting status of ever-married adolescents.
| Indicators | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geographical area | |||||
| Sylhet | Reference | Reference | |||
| Barisal | 0.69 (0.55, 0.87) | 0.002 | 0.76 (0.60, 0.98) | 0.032 | |
| Chittagong | 0.64 (0.52, 0.80) | <0.001 | 0.78 (0.62, 0.98) | 0.031 | |
| Dhaka ! | 0.84 (0.67, 1.04) | 0.108 | 0.92 (0.73, 1.17) | 0.508 | |
| Khulna | 0.54 (0.43, 0.68) | <0.001 | 0.61 (0.48, 0.78) | <0.001 | |
| Rajshahi $ | 0.75 (0.61, 0.92) | 0.006 | 0.78 (0.62, 0.97) | 0.028 | |
| Place of residence | |||||
| Rural | Reference | Reference | |||
| Urban | 1.08 (0.96, 1.23) | 0.203 | 1.24 (1.08, 1.43) | 0.003 | |
| Wealth index | |||||
| Richest | Reference | Reference | |||
| Poorest | 1.75 (1.43, 2.13) | <0.001 | 1.65 (1.30, 2.10) | <0.001 | |
| Poorer | 1.62 (1.35, 1.94) | <0.001 | 1.64 (1.33, 2.04) | <0.001 | |
| Middle | 1.23 (1.02, 1.49) | 0.028 | 1.39 (1.13, 1.71) | 0.002 | |
| Richer | 1.22 (1.01, 1.47) | 0.036 | 1.32 (1.09, 1.60) | 0.005 | |
| Education | |||||
| At least secondary | Reference | Reference | |||
| Below secondary | 1.68 (1.49, 1.89) | <0.001 | 1.31 (1.14, 1.51) | <0.001 | |
| Age (months) | 1.01 (1.01, 1.01) | <0.001 | 1.01 (1.01, 1.02) | <0.001 | |
| Working status | |||||
| Not working | Reference | Reference | |||
| Working | 1.29 (1.12, 1.50) | 0.001 | 1.17 (0.99, 1.38) | 0.058 | |
| Husband’s age | 0.96 (0.95, 0.98) | <0.001 | 0.96 (0.95, 0.98) | <0.001 | |
| Husband’s education | |||||
| At least secondary | Reference | Reference | |||
| Below secondary | 1.59 (1.42, 1.78) | <0.001 | 1.25 (1.10, 1.42) | 0.001 | |
| Domestic violence | |||||
| No | Reference | Reference | |||
| Yes | 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) | 0.411 | 1.16 (1.02, 1.32) | 0.027 | |
| Religion | |||||
| Other | Reference | Reference | |||
| Muslim | 1.31 (1.07, 1.60) | 0.010 | 1.36 (1.10, 1.68) | 0.005 | |
| Round | |||||
| 2007 | Reference | Reference | |||
| 2011 | 0.86 (0.73, 1.01) | 0.065 | 0.88 (0.74, 1.04) | 0.128 | |
| 2014 | 0.79 (0.66, 0.93) | 0.006 | 0.79 (0.66, 0.94) | 0.007 | |
| 2017–2018 | 0.75 (0.64, 0.88) | 0.001 | 0.73 (0.62, 0.87) | <0.001 | |
! Mymensing division was united with Dhaka. $ Rangpur division was united with Rajshahi.
Figure 3Status of childhood stunting by maternal stunting stratified by category round of the BDHS survey.
Survey round-specific association between the adolescent mother’s stunting and the child’s stunting status.
| BDHS Round | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted * OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 2.54 (1.75, 3.69) | <0.001 | 2.62 (1.74, 3.92) | <0.001 |
| 2011 | 1.88 (1.39, 2.55) | <0.001 | 1.66 (1.19, 2.32) | 0.003 |
| 2014 | 2.17 (1.52, 3.10) | <0.001 | 2.36 (1.58, 3.53) | <0.001 |
| 2017–2018 | 2.85 (2.07, 3.91) | <0.001 | 3.78 (2.59, 5.53) | <0.001 |
| Overall | 2.31 (1.95, 2.73) | <0.001 | 2.36 (1.96, 2.84) | <0.001 |
* Adjusted odds ratio of having childhood stunting among the stunted mothers compared to the non-stunted ones was calculated using multiple logistic regression after adjusting for the relevant covariates such as geographical area, place of residence, wealth index, number of HH members, religion, age (years), maternal education, husband’s education, husband’s age, attitudes to domestic violence, use of contraception, delivery type, working status, child’s age, child’s sex, and BDHS round for the overall model. The outcome variable was the childhood stunting status and the exposure variable was the adolescent mother’s stunting status.
Association between the childhood stunting and the adolescent mother’s stunting by geographical region.
| Indicators | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted * OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Stunted mother × Sylhet | Reference | Reference | ||
| Stunted mother × Barisal | 1.39 (0.86, 2.25) | 0.173 | 1.13 (0.69, 1.84) | 0.632 |
| Stunted mother × Chittagong | 0.76 (0.49, 1.20) | 0.239 | 0.83 (0.52, 1.32) | 0.435 |
| Stunted mother × Dhaka ! | 0.93 (0.60, 1.45) | 0.742 | 0.89 (0.56, 1.42) | 0.624 |
| Stunted mother × Khulna | 1.05 (0.64, 1.71) | 0.847 | 1.03 (0.62, 1.73) | 0.900 |
| Stunted mother × Rajshahi $ | 1.16 (0.76, 1.76) | 0.491 | 0.92 (0.60, 1.43) | 0.725 |
| Non-stunted mother × Barisal | 0.51 (0.32, 0.81) | 0.004 | 0.43 (0.26, 0.70) | 0.001 |
| Non-stunted mother × Chittagong | 0.37 (0.24, 0.57) | <0.001 | 0.37 (0.23, 0.60) | <0.001 |
| Non-stunted mother × Dhaka ! | 0.44 (0.28, 0.68) | <0.001 | 0.37 (0.23, 0.59) | <0.001 |
| Non-stunted mother × Khulna | 0.35 (0.22, 0.55) | <0.001 | 0.32 (0.20, 0.52) | <0.001 |
| Non-stunted mother × Rajshahi $ | 0.45 (0.29, 0.68) | <0.001 | 0.39 (0.25, 0.60) | <0.001 |
| Non-stunted mother × Sylhet | 0.73 (0.43, 1.24) | 0.245 | 0.83 (0.47, 1.45) | 0.509 |
! Mymensing division was united with Dhaka. $ Rangpur division was united with Rajshahi. * Adjusted for the place of residence, wealth index, number of HH members, religion, age (years), maternal education, husband’s education, husband’s age, attitudes to domestic violence, use of contraception, delivery type, working status, child’s age, child’s sex, and BDHS round.