| Literature DB >> 35682314 |
Bo Li1, Jing Liu1, Qian Liu2, Muhammad Mohiuddin3.
Abstract
Resource-based cities (RBCs) face serious environmental pollution, and there are efforts to try to overcome those challenges by transforming industrial structure through investing in new technologies. Based on the panel data of 114 prefecture-level resource-based cities in China, this paper uses the difference-in-differences (DID) method to identify the effects of the "Broadband China" pilot policy on the carbon emission efficiency of resource-based cities. The results show that the "Broadband China" pilot policy has a significant effect on the improvement of carbon emission efficiency of resource-based cities, and the results are still valid after parallel trend test, PSM-DID estimation and placebo test. This study also finds that there are differences in the carbon emission efficiency of different locations and types of resource-based cities. In addition, the results of the mechanism analysis show that the "Broadband China" pilot policy can promote the improvement of carbon emission efficiency by promoting the upgrading of the industrial structure, the accumulation of human capital and the improvement of the level of urban innovation of resource-based cities. The findings provide a reference for China's resource-based cities to develop the Broadband infrastructure, realize industrial upgrading, accumulate human capital and improve urban innovation level, and promote low-carbon transformation and improve carbon emission efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Broadband China; DID; carbon emission efficiency; resource-based cities
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35682314 PMCID: PMC9180310 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1“Broadband China” city development process.
Input–output index system of carbon emission efficiency.
| Index | Variable | Unit | Calculation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| input | fixed capital stock | million |
|
| employees | 10,000 people | - | |
| social electricity consumption | 10,000 kWh | - | |
| desired output | GDP | million | - |
| undesired output | CO2 emission | 10,000 t |
1 K is fixed capital stock of the current year; I is fixed asset investment in the current year; δ is the rate of economic depreciation, which is 9.6%. 2 Q represents total carbon dioxide emissions; C1, C2 and C3 are carbon dioxide emissions caused by LPG, gas and electricity consumption of the whole society, respectively; K is the CO2 conversion coefficient of LPG, E1 is the consumption of LPG; V is the CO2 conversion coefficient of gas, and E2 is gas consumption; E3 is annual electricity consumption; η is the proportion of coal power in the total power generation; φ is the GHG emission coefficient of coal power fuel chain.
Descriptive statistics of variables.
| Variable Category | Variable Name | Variable Unit | Observation | Mean | Mean Standard | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explained variable |
| - | 1710 | 0.463 | 0.221 | 0.157 | 1.118 |
| Core explanatory variable |
| - | 1710 | 0.0778 | 0.268 | 0 | 1 |
| Intermediary variables |
| % | 1710 | 35.07 | 7.640 | 8.580 | 85.34 |
|
| % | 1710 | 0.00879 | 0.00779 | 0 | 0.0576 | |
|
| % | 1710 | 0.107 | 0.0731 | 0 | 0.667 | |
| Control variables |
| million | 1710 | 0.941 | 0.812 | 0.0500 | 6.090 |
|
| % | 1710 | 3.502 | 2.060 | 0.272 | 22.23 | |
|
| m2 | 1710 | 14.11 | 7.334 | 2.250 | 60.07 | |
|
| % | 1710 | 0.334 | 0.220 | 0.0611 | 1 | |
|
| % | 1710 | 18.26 | 4.317 | 1.69 × 10−5 | 37.74 | |
|
| % | 1710 | 11.06 | 4.994 | −19.38 | 37.69 | |
|
| % | 1710 | 2.489 | 4.933 | 0 | 63.95 |
Benchmark regression results.
| Variable |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
|
| 0.0280 * | 0.0290 ** | 0.0245 * | 0.0259 * |
| (0.0147) | (0.0148) | (0.0148) | (0.0149) | |
|
| −0.0388 *** | −0.0391 *** | ||
| (0.0091) | (0.0091) | |||
|
| 0.0074 *** | 0.0049 ** | ||
| (0.0020) | (0.0023) | |||
|
| −0.0020 ** | −0.0021 ** | ||
| (0.0009) | (0.0009) | |||
|
| −0.0125 | −0.0110 | ||
| (0.0541) | (0.0541) | |||
|
| 0.0026 ** | 0.0027 ** | ||
| (0.0012) | (0.0013) | |||
|
| −0.0016 * | −0.0019 * | ||
| (0.0010) | (0.0010) | |||
|
| −0.0020 ** | −0.0020 ** | ||
| (0.0008) | (0.0008) | |||
|
| 0.4024 *** | 0.4078 *** | 0.4053 *** | 0.4255 *** |
| (0.0117) | (0.0389) | (0.0118) | (0.0396) | |
|
| 1710 | 1710 | 1691 | 1691 |
Note: Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses; *, **, and *** are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.
Parallel trend test regression results.
| Period |
| Period |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| pre4 | −0.0056 | post1 | 0.0461 * |
| (−0.2379) | (1.9100) | ||
| pre3 | 0.0123 | post2 | 0.0384 |
| (0.5125) | (1.5810) | ||
| pre2 | 0.0205 | post3 | 0.0646 ** |
| (0.8515) | (1.9921) | ||
| pre1 | 0.0389 | post4 | 0.0965 * |
| (1.6103) | (1.7484) | ||
| current | 0.0057 | _cons | 0.4024 *** |
| (0.2354) | (34.5181) | ||
|
| 1710 |
| 1710 |
Note: Value T statistics are reported in parentheses; *, **, and *** are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.
Figure 2Parallel trend test chart.
PSM and balance test results.
| Variable | Coefficient | Sample | Mean | % Bias | t | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treated | Control | ||||||
|
| 0.2076 | Unmatched | 0.9797 | 0.9239 | 7.3 | 1.32 | 0.18 |
| (0.0695) | Matched | 0.9897 | 1.0592 | −9.0 | −1.21 | 0.22 | |
|
| −0.1008 | Unmatched | 3.3890 | 3.5544 | −8.1 | −1.54 | 0.12 |
| (0.0316) | Matched | 3.3934 | 3.3930 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.99 | |
|
| −0.0347 | Unmatched | 15.7280 | 13.3560 | 31.7 | 6.29 | 0.00 |
| (0.0078) | Matched | 15.6740 | 15.6750 | −0.0 | −0.00 | 1.00 | |
|
| 2.6947 | Unmatched | 0.4251 | 0.2917 | 60.2 | 12.17 | 0.00 |
| (0.2703) | Matched | 0.4165 | 0.4143 | 1.0 | 0.14 | 0.88 | |
|
| −0.0697 | Unmatched | 17.1780 | 18.7540 | −36.0 | −7.12 | 0.00 |
| (0.0138) | Matched | 17.2720 | 17.7460 | −10.8 | −1.76 | 0.07 | |
|
| 0.0485 | Unmatched | 11.3710 | 10.9180 | 9.0 | 1.75 | 0.08 |
| (0.0117) | Matched | 11.2760 | 11.3610 | −1.7 | −0.28 | 0.78 | |
|
| 0.0183 | Unmatched | 3.1807 | 2.1700 | 20.0 | 3.95 | 0.00 |
| (0.0113) | Matched | 3.2247 | 3.3158 | −1.8 | −0.24 | 0.81 | |
Note: Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses.
Figure 3Placebo test.
Heterogeneity regression results for different city locations.
| Variables |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (4) | (5) | |
| 0.0680 *** | ||||
| (0.0263) | ||||
| 0.0091 | ||||
| (0.0162) | ||||
| 0.0680 *** | ||||
| (0.0263) | ||||
| 0.0091 | ||||
| (0.0162) | ||||
|
| −0.0389 *** | −0.0371 *** | −0.0389 *** | −0.0371 *** |
| (0.0090) | (0.0091) | (0.0090) | (0.0091) | |
|
| 0.0075 *** | 0.0075 *** | 0.0075 *** | 0.0075 *** |
| (0.0020) | (0.0020) | (0.0020) | (0.0020) | |
|
| −0.0021 ** | −0.0021 ** | −0.0021 ** | −0.0021 ** |
| (0.0009) | (0.0009) | (0.0009) | (0.0009) | |
|
| −0.0198 | −0.0060 | −0.0198 | −0.0060 |
| (0.0542) | (0.0541) | (0.0542) | (0.0541) | |
|
| 0.0027 ** | 0.0028 ** | 0.0027 ** | 0.0028 ** |
| (0.0012) | (0.0012) | (0.0012) | (0.0012) | |
|
| −0.0014 | −0.0017 * | −0.0014 | −0.0017 * |
| (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | |
|
| −0.0018 ** | −0.0020 ** | −0.0018 ** | −0.0020 ** |
| (0.0008) | (0.0009) | (0.0008) | (0.0009) | |
|
| 0.4061 *** | 0.4010 *** | 0.4061 *** | 0.4010 *** |
| (0.0387) | (0.0388) | (0.0387) | (0.0388) | |
|
| 1710 | 1710 | 1710 | 1710 |
Note: Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses; *, **, and *** are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.
Heterogeneity regression results for different city types.
| Variables |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
| −0.0097 | |||
| (0.0226) | |||
| 0.0164 | |||
| (0.0200) | |||
| 0.0846 *** | |||
| (0.0275) | |||
|
| −0.0364 *** | −0.0372 *** | −0.0369 *** |
| (0.0091) | (0.0090) | (0.0090) | |
|
| 0.0076 *** | 0.0075 *** | 0.0078 *** |
| (0.0020) | (0.0020) | (0.0020) | |
|
| −0.0021 ** | −0.0020 ** | −0.0021 ** |
| (0.0009) | (0.0009) | (0.0009) | |
|
| −0.0053 | −0.0091 | −0.0038 |
| (0.0541) | (0.0542) | (0.0539) | |
|
| 0.0029 ** | 0.0028 ** | 0.0026 ** |
| (0.0012) | (0.0012) | (0.0012) | |
|
| −0.0017 * | −0.0017 * | −0.0016 * |
| (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | |
|
| −0.0019 ** | −0.0019 ** | −0.0018 ** |
| (0.0008) | (0.0008) | (0.0008) | |
|
| 0.3979 *** | 0.4013 *** | 0.4018 *** |
| (0.0388) | (0.0388) | (0.0386) | |
|
| 1710 | 1710 | 1710 |
Note: Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses; *, **, and *** are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.
Mechanism regression results.
| Variables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
|
| 0.0290 ** | 1.6443 *** | 0.0262 * | 0.0019 *** | 0.0247 * | 0.0202 *** | 0.0260 * |
| (0.0148) | (0.4194) | (0.0148) | (0.0004) | (0.0149) | (0.0073) | (0.0148) | |
|
| 0.0017 * | ||||||
| (0.0009) | |||||||
|
| 2.2140 ** | ||||||
| (1.0125) | |||||||
|
| 0.1496 *** | ||||||
| (0.0510) | |||||||
|
| −0.0388 *** | −0.3918 | −0.0381 *** | −0.0001 | −0.0386 *** | −0.0003 | −0.0387 *** |
| (0.0091) | (0.2579) | (0.0091) | (0.0002) | (0.0091) | (0.0045) | (0.0091) | |
|
| 0.0074 *** | 0.2281 *** | 0.0070 *** | 0.0001 * | 0.0072 *** | −0.0011 | 0.0076 *** |
| (0.0020) | (0.0571) | (0.0020) | (0.0000) | (0.0020) | (0.0010) | (0.0020) | |
|
| −0.0020 ** | −0.0019 | −0.0020 ** | 0.0000 | −0.0021 ** | 0.0003 | −0.0021 ** |
| (0.0009) | (0.0254) | (0.0009) | (0.0000) | (0.0009) | (0.0004) | (0.0009) | |
|
| −0.0125 | −2.6749 * | −0.0079 | 0.0018 | −0.0164 | −0.0041 | −0.0119 |
| (0.0541) | (1.5369) | (0.0541) | (0.0013) | (0.0541) | (0.0267) | (0.0540) | |
|
| 0.0026 ** | 0.1124 *** | 0.0024 * | 0.0001 * | 0.0025 ** | 0.0022 *** | 0.0023 * |
| (0.0012) | (0.0352) | (0.0012) | (0.0000) | (0.0012) | (0.0006) | (0.0012) | |
|
| −0.0016 * | −0.2066 *** | −0.0012 | 0.0000 | −0.0017 * | 0.0006 | −0.0017 * |
| (0.0010) | (0.0272) | (0.0010) | (0.0000) | (0.0010) | (0.0005) | (0.0010) | |
|
| −0.0020 ** | 0.0276 | −0.0020 ** | −0.0000 | −0.0020 ** | 0.0014 *** | −0.0022 *** |
| (0.0008) | (0.0241) | (0.0008) | (0.0000) | (0.0008) | (0.0004) | (0.0008) | |
|
| 0.4078 *** | 33.2560 *** | 0.3506 *** | 0.0024 ** | 0.4024 *** | 0.0657 *** | 0.3980 *** |
| (0.0389) | (1.1044) | (0.0488) | (0.0010) | (0.0389) | (0.0192) | (0.0389) | |
|
| 1710 | 1710 | 1710 | 1710 | 1710 | 1710 | 1710 |
Note: Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses; *, **, and *** are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.