| Literature DB >> 35682200 |
Bingchun Liu1, Ningbo Zhang1, Lingli Wang2, Xinming Zhang3.
Abstract
The accurate prediction of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) electricity generation is very important for the fine management of a city. This paper selects Shanghai as the research object, through the construction of a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) model, and chooses six influencing factors of MSW generation as the input indicators, to realize the effective prediction of MSW generation. Then, this study obtains the MSW electricity generation capacity in Shanghai by using the aforementioned prediction results and the calculation formula of theMSW electricity generation. The experimental results show that, firstly, the mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE) values of the BiLSTM model are 42.31, 7.390, and 63.32. Second, it is estimated that by 2025, the maximum and minimum production of MSW in Shanghai will be 17.35 million tons and 8.82 million tons under the three scenarios. Third, it is predicted that in 2025, the maximum and minimum electricity generation of Shanghai MSW under the three scenarios will be 512.752 GWh/y and 260.668 GWh/y. Finally, this paper can be used as a scientific information source for environmental sustainability decision-making for domestic MSW electricity generation technology.Entities:
Keywords: BiLSTM; MSW generation volume forecasting; electric power generation; waste to energy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35682200 PMCID: PMC9180520 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116616
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Research and comparison on prediction of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW).
| Methods | Models | Authors (Year) | Cases | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| linear regression method | nonlinear autoregressive | Sunayana et al. (2021) | India | maximum error of 6.34% |
| regression analysis | Ghinea et al. (2016) | America | - | |
| statistical analysis methods | statistical analysis | Li et al. (2011) | Beijing | - |
| artificial neural network | Artificial neural network | Alidoust et al. (2021) [ | - | R2 = 0.98 |
| ANN neural network | Sun et al. (2017) | Bangkok | R2 = 0.96 | |
| support vector machine | Noori et al. (2009) | Mashhad | MRE: 3.35% |
- This symbol indicates no mention of performance.
Figure 1Logical structure diagram of this research.
Figure 2Structure diagram of Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM).
Six indicator statistics.
| Max | Min | Average | Std. Dev | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSW | 1038 | 108 | 474.54 | 247.95 |
| Gross regional product | 32,679.87 | 272.81 | 8071.50 | 9595.54 |
| Permanent resident population at year-end | 2424 | 1098 | 1662.07 | 470.75 |
| Per capita disposable income of urban households | 60,231 | 560 | 16,637.90 | 18,126.98 |
| Per capita consumption expenditure of urban households | 46,015 | 488 | 12,127.02 | 12,873.64 |
| Number of urban public transport vehicles operating | 23,516 | 2983 | 13,011 | 6824.21 |
| The population density | 3823 | 1785 | 2670.78 | 720.99 |
Biological drying hypothesis.
| Waste Constituents | Class | Moisture Content (% wb) | Water Reduction Via Biodrying (%) | Organic Matter Reduction Via Biodrying (%) | LHV1 (MJ/kg) | LHV2 (MJ/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organics | W1 | 84.8 | 75 | 16 | 4.4 | 11.3 |
| Paper | W2 | 12.2 | 60 | 8 | 11.7 | 13.2 |
| Plastics | W3 | 14.8 | 35 | 0 | 37.7 | 38.1 |
| Glass and ceramics | W4 | 2.4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Metal | W5 | 2.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Textiles and Rubber | W6 | 7.8 | 60 | 6 | 17.2 | 21.0 |
| Wood and others | W7 | 5.4 | 45 | 6 | 9.8 | 12.3 |
Figure 3Volume of waste constituents under different scenarios.
Parameter setting for the BiLSTM neural network.
| Model | Time Step | Learn Rate | Batch_Size | Hidden_Layer | Epoch | Mape (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BiLSTM | 2 | 0.01 | 2 | 32 | 5000 | 11.236 |
| 2 | 0.01 | 2 | 64 | 10,000 | 9.626 | |
| 2 | 0.001 | 2 | 64 | 10,000 | 7.390 | |
| 2 | 0.001 | 3 | 64 | 10,000 | 10.428 | |
| 2 | 0.001 | 3 | 128 | 10,000 | 12.528 |
Comparison of prediction performances using deep learning models.
| Model | MAE | Mape (%) | RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|
| SVR | 163.28 | 19.32 | 183.24 |
| GRU | 173.82 | 17.32 | 163.23 |
| LSTM | 163.23 | 19.42 | 176.32 |
| Bi-SVR | 128.32 | 14.32 | 132.73 |
| Bi-GRU | 123.53 | 18.32 | 125.53 |
| BiLSTM | 42.31 | 7.390 | 63.32 |
Growth rate of each indicator under different situations.
| Scene Category | The Population Density | Number of Urban Public Transport Vehicles in Operation | Permanent Resident Population at Year-End | Gross Regional Product | Per Capita Disposable Income | Per Capita Consumption Expenditure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario 1 | 0.0014 | 0.0125 | 0.0081 | 0.0137 | 0.0173 | 0.0334 |
| Scenario 2 | 0.0020 | 0.0593 | 0.0280 | 0.0230 | 0.0210 | 0.0480 |
| Scenario 3 | 0.0121 | 0.0745 | 0.0254 | 0.0353 | 0.0346 | 0.0545 |
Figure 4Scenario prediction of MSW generation in Shanghai.
Figure 5MSW electricity generation under different scenarios.