| Literature DB >> 35682158 |
Haiyue Lu1, Xiaoping Rui2, Gadisa Fayera Gemechu1,3, Runkui Li4.
Abstract
The interplay of specific weather conditions and human activity results due to haze. When the haze arrives, individuals will use microblogs to communicate their concerns and feelings. It will be easier for municipal administrators to alter public communication and resource allocation under the haze if we can master the emotions of netizens. Psychological tolerance is the ability to cope with and adjust to psychological stress and unpleasant emotions brought on by adversity, and it can guide human conduct to some extent. Although haze has a significant impact on human health, environment, transportation, and other factors, its impact on human mental health is concealed, indirect, and frequently underestimated. In this study, psychological tolerance was developed as a psychological impact evaluation index to quantify the impact of haze on human mental health. To begin, data from microblogs in China's significantly haze-affected districts were collected from 2013 to 2019. The emotion score was then calculated using SnowNLP, and the subject index was calculated using the co-word network approach, both of which were used as social media evaluation indicators. Finally, utilizing ecological and socioeconomic factors, psychological tolerance was assessed at the provincial and prefecture level. The findings suggest that psychological tolerance differs greatly between areas. Psychological tolerance has a spatio-temporal trajectory in the timeseries as well. The findings offer a fresh viewpoint on haze's mental effects.Entities:
Keywords: haze perception; psychological tolerance level; quantitative evaluation; sentiment analysis; spatio-temporal trajectory
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35682158 PMCID: PMC9180424 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The geographical location of the study area.
Text preprocessing on a microblog.
| Original Microblog | Cleaned Microblog | Remove Stop Words |
|---|---|---|
| What businesses have been closed or banned as a result of the recent blue sky cloudy weather? | The hazy weather has been substantially reduced in return for the current blue sky, and businesses have been shut down or outlawed. | Many businesses have closed as a result of the recent hazy weather, and the current blue sky has been outlawed. |
| Toxins and harmful substances are eliminated from the body by enzymes that serve no other purpose but to keep the body healthy; consequently, health comes first! | During highly hazy days, enzymes are required to remove toxins and hazardous chemicals from the body; therefore, health comes first. | On days when there is a lot of haze, enzymes remove toxins and poisonous substances from the body. |
| Haze is made up of a variety of substances that will most likely thicken in the skin! (Puhuangyu Community Health Center) | Haze has several substances that will likely build up in the skin. | The substances that cause haze block skin. |
Figure 2A flowchart depicting the techniques used.
Criteria for scoring in the judgment matrix.
| Comparative Score | Relative | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Equally crucial | Indicates that both variables are equally important |
| 3 | Significantly important | One element has a tiny advantage over another |
| 5 | Important | One component takes precedence over another |
| 7 | Extremely significant | One aspect is far more significant than the other |
| 9 | Extremely crucial | One aspect is far more crucial than the others |
| 2, 4, 6, 8 | Adjacency has a middle value. | When a compromise between the two components is required, these values are employed |
The RI is the average random consistency index.
| Matrix Order | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.41 | 1.45 |
Example of calculation result of emotion value of microblog data.
| Cleaned Microblog | Release Time | Sentiment Score | Sentiment Tendency |
|---|---|---|---|
| There are no foggy days in life as long as the heart is clear. New Year’s greetings for 2017! | 1 January 2017, 09:44 | 0.710162602 | Positive |
| The haze is such that still have the heart to fire the gun; I have nothing to say. | 1 February 2017, 08:01 | 0.32582773 | Negative |
| On a polluted day, high school students acted as nature’s vacuum cleaners, while teachers stayed with their haze masks. | 4 May 2017, | 0.460606061 | Negative |
| This winter haze days really too much less awesome. | 18 December 2017, 11:56 | 0.809009009 | Positive |
Figure 3The temporal and spatial dispersion of the sentiment score (red (+); blue (−)). (The stars indicate the capitals of seven provinces).
Figure 4Perception of haze on a temporal and spatial scale. (The stars indicate the capitals of seven provinces).
Figure 5PM2.5 concentrations have a temporal and spatial distribution. (The stars indicate the capitals of seven provinces).
Figure 6Indicator timeseries study in Beijing.
Evaluation index system.
| Target Layer | Rule Layer | Index Layer |
|---|---|---|
| Psychological tolerance | Ecological environment | Air quality (μg/m3, C1), temperature (°C, C2), relative humidity (%, C3), wind speed (m/s, C4), pollution days (d, C5) |
| Social economy | Population density (person/km2, C6), per capita GDP (CNY, C7), proportion of secondary industry (%, C8), proportion of built-up area (%, C9), road area (10,000 m2, C10), per capita green space area (m2, C11), education level (C12), gender ratio (female = 100, C13) | |
| Social | Number of microblogs (C14), correlation coefficient of number (C15), sentiment score (C16), correlation coefficient of sentiment (C17), topic index (C18) |
Primary index judgment matrix.
| Primary Index | Ecological Environment | Social Economy | Social Media |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecological environment | 1 | 4 | 0.33333 |
| Social economy | 0.25 | 1 | 0.14286 |
| Social media | 3 | 7 | 1 |
Secondary index judgment matrix 1.
| Secondary Index | Temperature | Air Quality | Relative Humidity | Wind Speed | Pollution Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 1 | 5.95733 | 5.37924 | 6 | 1 |
| Air quality | 0.16786 | 1 | 0.36 | 2.35832 | 0.34832 |
| Relative humidity | 0.18591 | 2.77778 | 1 | 2.63424 | 0.13234 |
| Wind speed | 0.166667 | 0.42399 | 0.37962 | 1 | 0.16982 |
| Pollution days | 1 | 2.87092 | 7.55629 | 5.88859 | 1 |
Secondary index judgment matrix 2.
| Secondary Index | Population Density | Per Capita GDP | Proportion | Proportion of | Road Area | Per Capita Green | Education | Gender |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population density | 1 | 0.68472 | 0.15402 | 0.65873 | 0.52938 | 0.62348 | 0.31245 | 0.53981 |
| Per capita GDP | 1.46045 | 1 | 0.28564 | 2.43921 | 2.32913 | 0.31569 | 0.29837 | 2.4 |
| Proportion of secondary industry | 6.49284 | 3.50091 | 1 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.47921 | 2.68931 | 2.78931 |
| Proportion of built-up area | 1.51807 | 0.40997 | 0.4 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.33333 | 0.57532 | 0.5 |
| Road area | 1.88901 | 0.42934 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.65 | 2.63922 |
| Per capita green space area | 1.60391 | 3.16766 | 0.40335 | 3 | 1.42857 | 1 | 2.42324 | 2.58482 |
| Education level | 3.20051 | 3.35154 | 0.37184 | 1.73816 | 1.53846 | 0.41267 | 1 | 2.35382 |
| Gender ratio | 1.8525 | 0.41667 | 0.35851 | 2 | 0.37879 | 0.38687 | 0.42484 | 1 |
Secondary index judgment matrix 3.
| Secondary Index | Number | Correlation | Sentiment | Correlation | Topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of microblogs | 1 | 0.31582 | 0.166667 | 0.45225 | 0.12424 |
| Correlation coefficient of number | 3.16636 | 1 | 0.65392 | 1.1 | 0.16667 |
| Sentiment score | 6 | 1.52924 | 1 | 1.27 | 0.72737 |
| Correlation coefficient of sentiment | 2.21116 | 0.90909 | 0.7874 | 1 | 1.1 |
| Topic index | 8.04894 | 6 | 1.37482 | 0.90909 | 1 |
Calculation results of the index weight.
| Target Layer | System Layer | Index Layer | AHP | Entropy Weight Method | Combination Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological tolerance | Ecological | Air quality (C1) | 0.103307 | 0.01794 | 0.070799 |
| Temperature (C2) | 0.021266 | 0.087627 | 0.046536 | ||
| Relative humidity (C3) | 0.027740 | 0.059598 | 0.039871 | ||
| Wind speed (C4) | 0.012561 | 0.07623 | 0.036806 | ||
| Pollution days (C5) | 0.098562 | 0.054243 | 0.081686 | ||
| Social | Population density (C6) | 0.029542 | 0.114473 | 0.061884 | |
| Per capita GDP (C7) | 0.004224 | 0.033572 | 0.015400 | ||
| The proportion of secondary industry (C8) | 0.008478 | 0.070581 | 0.032127 | ||
| The proportion of built-up area (C9) | 0.020486 | 0.064344 | 0.037187 | ||
| Road area (C10) | 0.004855 | 0.068431 | 0.029065 | ||
| Per capita green space area (C11) | 0.009563 | 0.050828 | 0.025277 | ||
| Education level (C12) | 0.014204 | 0.055002 | 0.029740 | ||
| Gender ratio (C13) | 0.011559 | 0.024712 | 0.016568 | ||
| Social | Number of microblogs (C14) | 0.033488 | 0.022391 | 0.029262 | |
| The correlation coefficient of number (C15) | 0.090235 | 0.03637 | 0.069723 | ||
| Sentiment score (C16) | 0.159775 | 0.034084 | 0.111912 | ||
| The correlation coefficient of sentiment (C17) | 0.124904 | 0.096453 | 0.114070 | ||
| Topic index (C18) | 0.249201 | 0.033121 | 0.166918 |
Comprehensive evaluation results of psychological tolerance.
| 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 0.48971 | 0.506841 | 0.602236 | 0.432072 | 0.447645 | 0.541737 | 0.521512 |
| Tianjin | 0.495376 | 0.422032 | 0.378095 | 0.501404 | 0.426962 | 0.53912 | 0.498869 |
| Hebei | 0.491715 | 0.453081 | 0.557138 | 0.363952 | 0.446847 | 0.548772 | 0.527312 |
| Liaoning | 0.632011 | 0.539867 | 0.591269 | 0.569133 | 0.569305 | 0.72548 | 0.674516 |
| Shanxi | 0.553621 | 0.510981 | 0.564137 | 0.561731 | 0.650882 | 0.613825 | 0.542213 |
| Shandong | 0.598622 | 0.426567 | 0.576922 | 0.48618 | 0.434261 | 0.50842 | 0.502466 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.637273 | 0.566498 | 0.644165 | 0.539332 | 0.689162 | 0.731031 | 0.697857 |
Figure 7Timeseries of tolerance index.
Figure 8Psychological tolerance’s temporal and spatial distribution in prefecture-level cities. (The stars indicate the capitals of seven provinces).
Figure 9Temporal and spatial changes of prefecture level city scale psychological tolerance in winter 2013–2019. (The stars indicate the capitals of seven provinces).
Figure 10Psychological tolerance index types with spatial and temporal variation. (The stars indicate the capitals of seven provinces).