| Literature DB >> 35682102 |
Armando Meyer1, Aline Souza Espindola Santos1, Carmen Ildes Rodrigues Froes Asmus2, Volney Magalhaes Camara1, Antônio José Leal Costa3, Dale P Sandler4, Christine Gibson Parks4.
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that pesticides may play a role in chronic kidney disease. However, little is known about associations with acute kidney failure (AKF). We investigated trends in AKF and pesticide expenditures and associations with agricultural work in two Brazilian regions with intense use of pesticides, in the south and midwest. Using death certificate data, we investigated trends in AKF mortality (1980-2014). We used joinpoint regression to calculate annual percent changes in AKF mortality rates by urban/rural status and, in rural municipalities, by tertiles of per capita pesticide expenditures. We then compared AKF mortality in farmers and population controls from 2006 to 2014 using logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals adjusted by age, sex, region, education, and race. AKF mortality increased in both regions regardless of urban/rural status; trends were steeper from the mid-1990s to 2000s, and in rural municipalities, they were higher by tertiles of pesticide expenditures. Agricultural workers were more likely to die from AKF than from other causes, especially at younger ages, among females, and in the southern municipalities. We observed increasing AKF mortality in rural areas with greater pesticide expenditures and an association of AKF mortality with agricultural work, especially among younger workers.Entities:
Keywords: acute renal failure; agricultural occupation; death certificates; kidney diseases; mortality; pesticides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35682102 PMCID: PMC9179952 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Mortality trends for acute kidney failure, 1980–2014. (a) Acute kidney failure mortality crude rates for the south region and its rural and urban municipalities. (b) Acute kidney failure mortality crude rates for the midwest region and its rural and urban municipalities. * Significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Mortality trends for acute kidney failure by tertiles of pesticide consumption, 1980–2014. (a) Acute kidney failure mortality rates for south rural municipalities. (b) Acute kidney failure mortality crude rates for midwest rural municipalities. * Significant at p < 0.05.
Characteristics of AKF cases and controls, based on death certificates for southern and midwestern Brazilian states from 2006 to 2014.
| Cases | Controls | OR * (95% CI) | OR ** (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | |||
|
| ||||
| Male | 3215 (53.2) | 1,155,237 (57.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Female | 2826 (46.8) | 855,142 (42.5) | 1.19 (1.13–1.25) | 1.05 (0.99–1.11) |
|
| ||||
| ≤50 | 539 (8.9) | 409,646 (20.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 51–70 | 1656 (27.4) | 660,093 (32.8) | 1.91 (1.73–2.10) | 1.90 (1.70–2.13) |
| >70 | 3846 (63.7) | 941,090 (46.8) | 3.11 (2.84–3.40) | 3.07 (2.76–3.42) |
|
| ||||
| South | 4236 (70.1) | 1,509,866 (75.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Midwest | 1805 (29.9) | 500,963 (24.9) | 1.28 (1.22–1.36) | 1.37 (1.28–1.47) |
|
| ||||
| Non-white | 1416 (23.4) | 502,380 (25.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| White | 4625 (76.6) | 1,508,449 (75.0) | 1.09 (1.03–1.16) | 1.21 (1.11–1.30) |
|
| ||||
| More than high school | 166 (3.6) | 81,147 (5.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| High school or less | 4413 (96.4) | 1,438,597 (94.7) | 1.50 (1.28–1.75) | 1.30 (1.11–1.52) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 4030 (79.2) | 1,436,019 (83.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 1057 (20.8) | 274,834 (16.1) | 1.37 (1.28–1.47) | 1.32 (1.22–1.42) |
* Crude odds ratio; ** Odds ratio adjusted by sex, age at death, region of residence, race/ethnicity, education; *** Missing occupation data on 15.8% of cases and 14.9% of controls.
Overall, adjusted, and stratified AKF mortality among Brazilian southern and midwestern agricultural workers, 2006–2014.
| Cases | Controls | OR * (95% CI) | OR ** (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | |||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 1909 (72.1) | 758,357 (78.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 739 (27.9) | 202,515 (21.1) | 1.45 (1.33–1.58) | 1.27 (1.15–1.39) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 2121 (87.0) | 677,551 (90.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 318 (13.0) | 72,307 (9.6) | 1.41 (1.25–1.58) | 1.40 (1.23–1.59) |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 369 (86.4) | 296,921 (89.2) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 58 (13.6) | 35,774 (10.8) | 1.31 (0.99–1.72) | 1.56 (1.16–2.11) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 1147(83.4) | 474,278 (84.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 229 (16.6) | 85,743 (15.3) | 1.10 (0.96–1.27) | 1.13 (0.97–1.32) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 2514 (76.6) | 664,820 (81.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 770 (23.4) | 153,317 (18.7) | 1.33 (1.23–1.44) | 1.36 (1.25–1.49) |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 2851 (77.4) | 1,098,465 (83.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 831 (22.6) | 214,252 (16.3) | 1.49 (1.38–1.62) | 1.40 (1.29–1.53) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 1179 (83.9) | 337,554 (84.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 226 (16.1) | 60,582 (15.2) | 1.07 (0.93–1.23) | 1.06 (0.90–1.25) |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 908 (82.7) | 342,478 (84.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 190 (17.3) | 63,539 (15.6) | 1.13 (0.96–1.32) | 1.12 (0.94–1.34) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 3122 (78.3) | 1,093,541 (83.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 867 (21.7) | 211,295 (16.2) | 1.44 (1.33–1.55) | 1.37 (1.26–1.49) |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 146 (96.7) | 71,879 (98.1) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 5 (3.3) | 1390 (1.9) | 1.77 (0.73–4.33) | 1.82 (0.74–4.46) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 3036 (76.3) | 1,051,486 (81.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 941 (23.7) | 237,012 (18.4) | 1.38 (1.28–1.48) | 1.32 (1.22–1.42) |
* Crude odds ratio; ** Odds ratio adjusted by sex, age at death, region of residence, race/ethnicity, education; *** Missing data: 31.67% for cases and 32.28% for controls.
AKF mortality among Brazilian southern and midwestern agricultural workers, according to 10-year age strata, 2006–2014.
| Cases | Controls | OR * (95% CI) | OR ** (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | |||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 50 (83.3) | 72,588 (92.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 10 (16.7) | 6024 (7.7) | 2.41 (1.22–4.75) | 3.07 (1.71–6.26) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 92 (82.5) | 81,309 (89.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 16 (14.8) | 9349 (10.3) | 1.51 (0.89–2.57) | 1.57 (0.84–2.91) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 196 (87.9) | 126,365 (87.6) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 27 (12.1) | 17,886 (12.4) | 0.97 (0.65–1.46) | 1.25 (0.81–1.93) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 430 (86.7) | 196,179 (85.9) | ||
| Agricultural workers | 66 (13.3) | 32,237 (14.1) | 0.93 (0.72–1.21) | 0.95 (0.71–1.26) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 671 (82.4) | 264,325 (84.2) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 143 (17.6) | 49,687 (15.8) | 1.13 (0.95–1.36) | 1.16 (0.95–1.41) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 1049 (76.1) | 326,149 (81.7) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 329 (23.9) | 72,913 (18.3) | 1.40 (1.24–1.59) | 1.42 (1.24–1.63) |
|
| ||||
| Non-agricultural workers | 1542 (76.8) | 369,104 (81.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Agricultural workers | 466 (23.2) | 86,738 (19.0) | 1.29 (1.16–1.43) | 1.31 (1.17–1.47) |
* Crude odds ratio; ** Odds ratio adjusted by sex, age at death, region of residence, race/ethnicity, education.