| Literature DB >> 35682040 |
Rongbo Zhang1, Changbiao Zhong1.
Abstract
Based on a literature review and theoretical mechanism, this paper takes the implementation point of the adjustment and transformation policy for old industrial cities as the breakthrough point, and uses a regression model to explore the impact of the adjustment and transformation policy of these old industrial cities on urban carbon emissions. This paper also robustly tests the effective mechanisms and environmental hypotheses. Overall, the implementation of the adjustment and renovation policy has significantly reduced the carbon emissions of old industrial cities by about 0.068 units. Compared with the control group cities, the pilot cities reduced carbon emissions by an average of about 310,000 tons after the implementation of the policy. Based on a summary of the excellent Chinese case experience and an empirical analysis, it can be concluded that improvements in the green innovation capacity of old industrial cities, the agglomeration of high-end service industries, and the strengthening of ecological restoration are important mechanisms that lead to reduced carbon emissions. There is no subsequent exacerbation of the carbon intensity of neighboring cities, and there is insufficient evidence to prove pollution via neighboring transfers and use of the beggar-thy-neighbor policy. The extended analysis shows that the "inverted U-shaped" CO2 Kuznets environmental curve hypothesis is significantly present in the sample of old industrial cities, but most cities do not cross the threshold. In 2013, about 60% of the urban sample economic growth and carbon emissions showed signs of tapping into potentials and increasing efficiency (absolute decoupling) and intensive expansion (relative decoupling). In old industrial cities, the proportion of relative decoupling shows a fluctuating upward trend. In the future, the government should accurately select its own development orientation and actively seek the "best balance" between economic growth and a green and low-carbon path.Entities:
Keywords: carbon emission; green and low carbon path; mechanism path; old industrial city; policy evaluation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35682040 PMCID: PMC9180505 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Flow chart of research framework.
Descriptive statistics of the variables.
| Variable | Mean | Sd | P50 | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7568 | 1.1184 | 5.6489 | 2.0727 | 9.6311 | |
|
| 0.4029 | 0.4110 | 0.2805 | 0.0076 | 3.7777 |
|
| 0.9370 | 0.9177 | 0.7237 | 0.1197 | 16.9140 |
|
| 0.1717 | 0.2363 | 0.0872 | 0.0024 | 3.5022 |
|
| 2.2596 | 0.1436 | 2.2470 | 1.8312 | 2.8322 |
|
| 1.0861 | 0.6894 | 0.9195 | 0.0542 | 7.5041 |
|
| 0.8803 | 0.7019 | 0.7503 | 0.0161 | 9.7956 |
Figure 22007–2019 carbon emission trend chart of Treatment Group and Control Group cities.
Benchmark results estimation.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.068 ** | −0.068 ** | −0.017 ** | −0.014 * | −0.197 ** | −0.190 ** |
|
| 0.155 *** | 0.084 *** | 0.588 | |||
|
| −0.007 | −0.001 | 0.029 | |||
|
| −0.162 * | −0.162 *** | 3.322 | |||
|
| −0.139 | 0.071 | −0.734 | |||
|
| −0.004 | −0.000 | −0.028 | |||
|
| −0.015 | −0.047*** | −0.302 | |||
| _ | 5.593 *** | 5.885 *** | 0.973 *** | 1.040 *** | 7.084 *** | 8.331 *** |
| Year fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City clustering | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| 3570 | 3570 | 3570 | 3570 | 3570 | 3570 |
|
| 0.974 | 0.974 | 0.955 | 0.967 | 0.991 | 0.992 |
Note: Significant at the *** 1% level, ** 5% level, and * 10% level.
Figure 3Estimated coefficients of different quantiles.
Robustness test.
| Replacement Variable Test | Benchmark Variable Test | PSM-DID Test | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.070 ** | −0.059 * | −0.035 ** | −0.067 ** | −0.067 * | −0.066 ** | −0.066 * |
| _ | 5.759 *** | 5.652 *** | 2.630 *** | 5.885 *** | 5.885 *** | 5.899 *** | 5.898 *** |
| Individual effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City clustering | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| 3315 | 3570 | 3060 | 3570 | 3570 | 3526 | 3515 |
|
| 0.970 | 0.969 | 0.988 | 0.969 | 0.967 | 0.968 | 0.968 |
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Instrumental variable | 0.103 *** | −0.254 *** |
| −0.063 ** | −0.061 * | −0.017 | 0.007 |
| _ | −0.498 *** | 4.022 *** | _ | 5.533 *** | 5.646 *** | 5.586 *** | 4.708 *** |
| Control variable | Yes | Yes | Control variable | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Individual effect | Yes | Yes | Individual effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| F value | 18.29 | - | City clustering | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| 3570 | 3570 |
| 2184 | 2184 | 3570 | 3570 |
|
| 0.696 | 0.632 |
| 0.965 | 0.965 | 0.969 | 0.969 |
Note: *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level.
Figure 4Parallel trend test and CIC test. Note: The picture on the left is the parallel trend test. In the figure, the abscissa “−2” represents the 2nd year before the implementation of the policy, and “2” represents the 2nd year after the implementation of the policy. The ordinate represents the estimated coefficients. The picture on the right is the CIC test. The article uses data from six years before and after policy implementation for analysis. The abscissa represents the quantiles. The vertical axis represents the estimated value of the treatment effect. Solid lines with small triangles represent estimated coefficients at different quantiles. The solid horizontal line is the mean CIC estimate. The horizontal dashed line is its 95% confidence interval.
Heterogeneity analysis.
| East | Central Cities | West Cities | Large | Medium | Small | High-Speed Rail | No High-Speed Rail | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
|
| −0.079 ** | −0.017 | −0.123 * | −0.156 *** | −0.160 | −0.059 ** | −0.234 *** | −0.147 ** |
| _ | 5.816 *** | 5.751 *** | 5.572 *** | 5.899 *** | 7.136 *** | 5.713 *** | 5.024 *** | 5.012 *** |
| Individual effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City clustering | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| 1274 | 1260 | 1036 | 154 | 504 | 2912 | 2758 | 812 |
|
| 0.976 | 0.967 | 0.943 | 0.942 | 0.965 | 0.957 | 0.937 | 0.958 |
Note: *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level.
Conduction path analysis.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.174 *** | −0.064 * | 0.069 *** | −0.059 ** | 0.196 *** | −0.039 ** |
|
| −0.026 ** | |||||
|
| −0.029 *** | |||||
|
| −0.021 *** | |||||
| _ | 4.471 *** | 5.985 *** | 10.281 *** | 6.187 *** | 5.573 *** | 5.907 *** |
| Individual effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City clustering | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
| 3570 | 3570 | 3570 | 3570 | 3570 | 3570 |
|
| 0.917 | 0.969 | 0.904 | 0.974 | 0.901 | 0.998 |
Note: *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level.
Figure 5Number of cities decoupling states.
Environmental hypothesis testing and evidence of contamination transfer.
| Environmental Hypothesis Testing | Pollution Transfer Test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
|
| −0.068 ** | −0.068 ** | −0.068 ** | −0.046 | −0.044 |
|
| 0.238 *** | 0.306 *** | 0.306 *** | ||
|
| −0.052 ** | −0.061 ** | −0.061 ** | ||
|
| −0.014 | ||||
| _ | 5.515 *** | 5.872 *** | 5.904 *** | ||
| Individual effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| City clustering | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Control variable | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
|
| 3570 | 3570 | 3570 | 2254 | 2254 |
|
| 0.969 | 0.969 | 0.969 | 0.975 | 0.975 |
Note: *, **, and *** indicate significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level.