| Literature DB >> 35681537 |
Yi Gong1, Fiza Laheji1, Anna Berenson1, April Qian1, Sang-O Park1, Rene Kok2, Martin Selig1, Ryan Hahn1, Reza Sadjadi1, Stephan Kemp2,3, Florian Eichler1.
Abstract
Mutations in the peroxisomal half-transporter ABCD1 cause X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, resulting in elevated very long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA), progressive neurodegeneration and an associated pain syndrome that is poorly understood. In the nervous system of mice, we found ABCD1 expression to be highest in dorsal root ganglia (DRG), with satellite glial cells (SGCs) displaying higher expression than neurons. We subsequently examined sensory behavior and DRG pathophysiology in mice deficient in ABCD1 compared to wild-type mice. Beginning at 8 months of age, Abcd1-/y mice developed persistent mechanical allodynia. DRG had a greater number of IB4-positive nociceptive neurons expressing PIEZO2, the mechanosensitive ion channel. Blocking PIEZO2 partially rescued the mechanical allodynia. Beyond affecting neurons, ABCD1 deficiency impacted SGCs, as demonstrated by high levels of VLCFA, increased glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), as well as genes disrupting neuron-SGC connectivity. These findings suggest that lack of the peroxisomal half-transporter ABCD1 leads to PIEZO2-mediated mechanical allodynia as well as SGC dysfunction. Given the known supportive role of SGCs to neurons, this elucidates a novel mechanism underlying pain in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy.Entities:
Keywords: PIEZO2; RNA-seq; X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD); adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN); allodynia; dorsal root ganglion (DRG); glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP); mechanical hypersensitivity; pain; peroxisomes; satellite glial cells (SGCs)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681537 PMCID: PMC9180358 DOI: 10.3390/cells11111842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Figure 1Within the nervous system, ABCD1 protein is highest in satellite glial cells (SGC) of dorsal root ganglia (DRG). (A) Representative Western blot image showing ABCD1 protein expression in different mouse organs with Abcd1 mouse DRG tissue as negative control. SC = spinal cord (B) ABCD1 protein level in different organs of WT mice was quantified by image J with β-ACTIN as loading control (n = 6). (C) Representative confocal images showing ABCD1 mainly expressed in SGCs (thick arrow) that surround DRG neurons; Schwann cells (thin arrow) surrounding axons also show ABCD1 expression. Magnification shows the close proximity of ABCD1 to the neuronal membrane surface. (D) In Abcd1 DRG, there is no ABCD1 detectable in SGCs. Bar = 20 μm. Results were expressed as means ± SEM.
Figure 2Abcd1 mice exhibit mechanical but not thermal hypersensitivity. (A) Thermal sensitivity of Abcd1 mice measured by hotplate testing at 10 months (n = 7 for WT, n = 5 for Abcd1). (B) Thermal sensitivity of Abcd1 mice measured by hotplate testing at 14 months (n = 8 for WT, n = 7 for Abcd1). (C) Mechanical sensitivity of Abcd1-/y mice measured by Von Frey testing from 6 months until 20 months of age (n = 7 for WT, n = 8 for Abcd1). (D) Brush assay in 9–10-month-old mice (n = 7 for WT, n = 11 for Abcd1). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Figure 3Peroxisome dysfunction in Abcd1 mice leads to highest accumulation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) within DRG. Peroxisomes are present in both SGCs and neurons as evident by ABCD3 staining. They are present in greater abundance within SGCs in both WT (A) and Abcd1 (B), Bar = 10 μm. The VLCFA C24:0 (D) and C26:0 (E) but not C16:0 (C) were higher in Abcd1 mouse organs compared to wild-type measured by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and reported as nmol/mg protein (n = 8–14 for WT and n = 9–16 for Abcd1, numbers are labeled in each Figure). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Figure 4Dorsal root ganglia of Abcd1 mice reveal an increase in IB4-positive mechanical nociceptors. (A) Representative confocal images showing NF (red) and peripherin (green) staining in 1-month-old mouse DRG. Bar= 50 μm. (B) NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 1-month-old mouse DRG (n = 5 for WT and n = 6 for Abcd1). (C) Representative confocal images showing NF (red) and peripherin (green) staining in 13-month-old DRG. Bar = 100 μm. (D) NF-positive and peripherin-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 13-month-old mouse DRG (n = 4 for WT and n = 4 for Abcd1. (E) Representative confocal images showing CGRP (red) and IB4-conjugate (green) staining in 1-month-old mouse DRG. (F) CGRP-positive and IB4-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 1-month-old mouse DRG (n = 7 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1). (G) Representative confocal images showing CGRP (Red) and IB4-conjugate (green) staining in 11-month-old mouse DRG. (H) CGRP-positive and IB4-positive neurons were quantified by image J in 11-month-old mouse DRG (n = 5 for WT and n = 3 for Abcd1). (I) Western blot images showing CGRP expression in Abcd1 DRG (n = 6 for each). (J) Quantification of CGRP gene and protein expression in Abcd1 DRG. (K) Representative confocal images showing NeuN (red) and CGRP (green) staining in 8-month-old mouse spinal cord dorsal horn. (L) Quantification of CGRP immunostaining intensity in spinal cord dorsal horn (n = 4 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 as compared with WT control.
Enrichment analysis by process network of differential expressed genes between WT and Abcd1 DRG in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.
| # | Networks | Network Objects | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muscle contraction | 1.601 × 10−4 | GALR2, K(+) channel, subfamily J, EDNRA, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, MyHC, nAChR alpha, Galanin, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs |
| 2 | Inflammation_Interferon signaling | 3.178 × 10−3 | TIMP1, IRF7, IFI56, IL21R, IFI44 |
| 3 | Signal transduction_Neuropeptide signaling pathways | 1.326 × 10−2 | NPY, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, Secretogranin V, Galanin, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs |
| 4 | Signal transduction_Leptin signaling | 1.619 × 10−2 | NPY, Kir6.2, TIMP1, Galanin |
| 5 | Development_Blood vessel morphogenesis | 1.695 × 10−2 | Tissue kallikreins, EDNRA, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, RBP-J kappa (CBF1), Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs, EDNRB |
| 6 | Cardiac development_FGF_ErbB signaling | 2.625 × 10−2 | Kv4.2 channel, EDNRA, MyHC, BARX2 |
| 7 | Transport_Potassium transport | 3.153 × 10−2 | K(+) channel, subfamily J, Kir6.2, Kv4.2 channel, SLC24A4, SERT |
| 8 | Apoptosis_Apoptotic mitochondria | 3.513 × 10−2 | Bcl-G, HSP70, HRK |
| 9 | Proliferation_Positive regulation cell proliferation | 5.056 × 10−2 | EDNRA, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, TIMP1, ALK, CCKBR |
| 10 | Protein folding_ER and cytoplasm | 6.076 × 10−2 | HSC70, HSP70 |
Figure 5PIEZO2 is highly expressed in dorsal root ganglia of Abcd1 mice and blocking the mechanosensitive channel partially rescues mechanical allodynia. (A) qPCR verification of selected genes enriched in RNA−seq that are involved in key neuronal functions (n = 6 for WT and n = 7 for Abcd1). (B) Profiling of mechanosensitive channel genes and caveolin genes from RNA-seq data. (C) Impact of lipids upon Piezo1 and Piezo2 gene expression in differentiated rat DRG neurons. Changes in mechanical sensitivity in (D) Abcd1 and (E) WT mice after intrathecal (IT) delivery of PIEZO2 blocker D-GsMTx4 (25 μM; sensory thresholds assessed by Von Frey testing). (F) Schematic illustration of D-GsMTx4 blocking of PIEZO2 channels by IT delivery. Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Figure 6Increased GFAP expression occurs early in Abcd1 mouse DRG. (A) Representative western blot images showing GFAP expression in 1-month-old mouse DRG tissue with peripherin as comparison. (B) Quantification of GFAP protein level in 1-month-old mouse DRG tissue with β−ACTIN as loading control (n = 7 for WT and n = 5 for Abcd1). (C) Representative Western blot images showing GFAP expression in 15-month-old mouse DRG tissue with peripherin as comparison. (D) Quantification of GFAP protein level in 15-month-old mouse DRG tissue with β−ACTIN as loading control (n = 6 for WT and n = 8 for Abcd1). (E) Representative confocal images showing increased GFAP staining (green) in 15-month-old Abcd1 mouse DRG. Results were expressed as means ±SEM. * p < 0.05 as compared with WT control.
Figure 7Gliosis and peroxisome dysfunction in satellite glial cells of Abcd1 mice. (A) Western blot images showing increased GFAP expression in primary cultured Abcd1 SGCs with β-ACTIN as loading control. ABCD1 expression confirmed knockdown in Abcd1 mice. (B) Quantification of GFAP gene (qPCR) and protein expression in Abcd1 SGCs (n = 4 for protein groups and n = 3 for gene groups). (C) Representative confocal images showing increased GFAP staining (green) in primary cultured Abcd1 SGCs. (D) Increased C26:0 and C24:0(nmol/mg protein) in primary cultured SGCs from Abcd1 mice (n = 3 for each group). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. # p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 as compared with WT control.
Enrichment analysis by process network of differentially expressed genes between WT and Abcd1 SGCs in RNA-seq using metacore bioinformatics tool.
| # | Networks | Network Objects | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cell adhesion_Amyloid proteins | 1.453 × 10−5 | Frizzled, NOTCH3 (3ICD), SFRP4, WNT11, NOTCH3, FZD4, SR-BI, Notch, Actin cytoskeletal, WNT, Caveolin-1, Actin |
| 2 | Development_Blood vessel morphogenesis | 2.888 × 10−4 | Galpha(q)-specific amine GPCRs, Galpha(i)-specific amine GPCRs, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, FOXC1/2, PF4, Alpha-1B adrenergic receptor, ANGPTL4, Notch, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs, FOXC1, Transferrin |
| 3 | Development_Ossification and bone remodeling | 1.463 × 10−3 | Frizzled, Follistatin, SFRP4, FOXC1/2, FOXC1, IGF-1, IBP, WNT |
| 4 | Signal transduction_ | 3.145 × 10−3 | Frizzled, IL-6, IGF-1, WNT, Caveolin-1 |
| 5 | Cell adhesion_Cadherins | 3.809 × 10−3 | WISP1, Frizzled, WISP2, SFRP4, Actin cytoskeletal, WNT, F-Actin, Actin |
| 6 | Proliferation_Negative regulation of cell proliferation | 3.938 × 10−3 | IBP2, WISP2, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, IBP5, IL-6, GPNMB (Osteoactivin), IGF-1, IBP |
| 7 | Cell adhesion_ | 7.156 × 10−3 | Fibulin-1, PF4, Elastin, HP, Actin cytoskeletal, Neurocan, Actin |
| 8 | Cell adhesion_Cell-matrix interactions | 8.849 × 10−3 | WISP1, MMP-12, Fibulin-1, Elastin, ITGA11, Mindin, LAMA1, Neurocan |
| 9 | Signal transduction_WNT signaling | 1.137 × 10−2 | WISP1, Frizzled, WISP2, SFRP4, WNT11, FOXC1, WNT |
| 10 | Development_Regulation of angiogenesis | 1.152 × 10−2 | Ephrin-A receptors, Galpha(i)-specific peptide GPCRs, Leptin receptor, AGTR2, PF4, IL-6, ANGPTL4, Galpha(q)-specific peptide GPCRs |
| 11 | Development_Skeletal muscle development | 1.436 × 10−2 | Actin muscle, Elastin, ITGA11, ACTG2, IGF-1, Actin |
| 12 | Development_Neurogenesis_Axonal guidance | 1.439 × 10−2 | Ephrin-A receptor 3, Ephrin-A receptors, NckAP1, PACAP receptor 1, Mindin, Actin cytoskeletal, DARPP-32, Actin |
| 13 | Signal transduction | 1.620 × 10−2 | Frizzled, NOTCH3 (3ICD), SFRP4, WNT11, NOTCH3, FZD4, WNT, PDGF-B |
| 14 | Development_Neurogenesis in general | 1.761 × 10−2 | Frizzled, Galpha(q)-specific amine GPCRs, Galpha(i)-specific amine GPCRs, NOTCH3, FZD4, Notch, WNT |
| 15 | Cell adhesion_Integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion | 7.696 × 10−2 | RHG7, Caveolin-2, ITGA11, Actin cytoskeletal, Caveolin-1, Actin |
Figure 8Activated satellite glial cells alter genes potentially affecting mechanical properties of neuronal membranes. (A) Heat map showing the hierarchical clustering of genes related to cell adhesion and cell matrix interaction as well as lipid and vesicle membrane transportation in Abcd1 SGCs at |log2 FC| > 1 threshold. (B) qPCR verification of selected genes enriched in RNA-seq that are involved in membrane mechanical properties (n = 3 for each group). Results were expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 as compared with WT control.