| Literature DB >> 35681353 |
Yu Gao1, Xiangyu Guan1, Ailin Wan2, Yuan Cui2, Xiaoxi Kou1, Rui Li1, Shaojin Wang1,3.
Abstract
Mold infections in almonds are a safety issue during post-harvest, storage and consumption, leading to health problems for consumers and causing economic losses. The aim of this study was to isolate mold from infected almond kernels and identify it by whole genome sequence (WGS). Then, the more heat resistant mold was selected and the thermal inactivation kinetics of this mold influenced by temperature and water activity (aw) was developed. Hot air-assisted radio frequency (RF) heating was used to validate pasteurization efficacy based on the thermal inactivation kinetics of this target mold. The results showed that the two types of molds were Penicillium and Aspergillus identified by WGS. The selected Aspergillus had higher heat resistance than the Penicillium in the almond kernels. Inactivation data for the target Aspergillus fitted the Weibull model better than the first-order kinetic model. The population changes of the target Aspergillus under the given conditions could be predicted from Mafart's modified Bigelow model. The RF treatment was effectively used for inactivating Aspergillus in almond kernels based on Mafart's modified Bigelow model and the cumulative lethal time model.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; almond kernels; radio frequency; thermal inactivation kinetics; verification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681353 PMCID: PMC9180863 DOI: 10.3390/foods11111603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Schematic view of a test cell with 18 mm diameter and 3.8 mm height (All dimensions are in mm) (Adapted from Hou et al. [13]).
Figure 2Schematic view of the pilot-scale 6 kW, 27.12 MHz RF system (Adapted from Wang et al. [33]).
Figure 3Five-layer (1–5) container for sample temperature measurements with five positions (A–E) and pre-drilled holes (all dimensions are in cm) (Adapted from Li et al. [32]).
Population reductions (mean ± SD, log CFU g−1) of Penicillium and Aspergillus inoculated in almond kernel flour with an a of 0.854 under the three treatment conditions.
| Types of Molds | Temperature (°C) + Holding Time (min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 °C + 7 min | 65 °C + 3 min | 68 °C + 1 min | |
|
| 2.07 ± 0.07 a,* | 3.52 ± 0.21 a | 1.55 ± 0.13 a |
|
| 1.42 ± 0.12 b | 2.21 ± 0.11 b | 1.10 ± 0.17 b |
* Different letters in the same column indicate that there were significant differences in the values of the population reductions with p < 0.05 between the two molds.
D-, δ- and p-values of the two models for the target Aspergillus in almond kernel flour at three a and temperature levels using test cells.
| Moisture Content |
| Temperature (°C) | First-Order Model | Weibull Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | RMSE | R2 | RMSE | ||||||
| 5.82 | 0.657 | 65 | 21.82 | 0.992 | 0.153 | 19.28 (12.21–26.34) | 0.92 (0.65–1.20) | 0.992 | 0.150 |
| 68 | 7.28 | 0.966 | 0.356 | 3.73 (2.21–5.25) | 0.70 (0.54–0.85) | 0.995 | 0.135 | ||
| 71 | 2.10 | 0.968 | 0.315 | 1.15 (0.54–1.75) | 0.70 (0.48–0.92) | 0.993 | 0.151 | ||
| 10.11 | 0.854 | 62 | 7.09 | 0.980 | 0.222 | 4.64 (3.59–5.69) | 0.76 (0.64–0.88) | 0.997 | 0.082 |
| 65 | 2.29 | 0.946 | 0.285 | 1.10 (0.82–1.37) | 0.59 (0.49–0.69) | 0.998 | 0.056 | ||
| 68 | 1.05 | 0.991 | 0.167 | 0.85 (0.53–1.18) | 0.88 (0.63–1.13) | 0.993 | 0.149 | ||
| 13.85 | 0.923 | 59 | 5.43 | 0.979 | 0.249 | 3.27 (2.00–4.55) | 0.73 (0.55–0.92) | 0.995 | 0.118 |
| 62 | 2.45 | 0.953 | 0.331 | 1.14 (0.34–1.94) | 0.63 (0.36–0.89) | 0.988 | 0.168 | ||
| 65 | 0.48 | 0.935 | 0.503 | 0.17 (0.03–0.30) | 0.59 (0.38–0.80) | 0.992 | 0.181 | ||
a CI 95%: Confidence Interval.
Figure 4The target Aspergillus inactivation from the first-order kinetic and the Weibull models affected by temperature under a of 0.854.
Figure 5Survival curves of Aspergillus at 65 °C with a of 0.657, 0.854 and 0.923, by fitting with first-order kinetic and Weibull models.
The re-estimated δ’-values at the mean of survival curves with the p-value fixed to 0.70.
| Moisture Content (% w.b.) |
| Temperature (°C) | R2 | RMSE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.82 | 0.657 | 65 | 13.40 (10.95–15.85) | 0.973 | 0.238 |
| 68 | 3.76 (3.47–4.06) | 0.995 | 0.117 | ||
| 71 | 1.14 (1.04–1.25) | 0.993 | 0.131 | ||
| 10.11 | 0.854 | 62 | 4.12 (3.79–4.45) | 0.995 | 0.098 |
| 65 | 1.37 (1.23–1.50) | 0.991 | 0.103 | ||
| 68 | 0.62 (0.53–0.72) | 0.980 | 0.213 | ||
| 13.85 | 0.923 | 59 | 3.04 (2.81–3.28) | 0.995 | 0.108 |
| 62 | 1.35 (1.18–1.52) | 0.985 | 0.162 | ||
| 65 | 0.23 (0.20–0.26) | 0.984 | 0.216 |
a CI 95%: Confidence Interval.
Calculated D, z, and z values of Mafart’s modified Bigelow model at 65 °C for the thermal inactivation of Aspergillus inoculated into the almond kernels.
| Parameter | First-Order Kinetic Model | Weibull Model | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| 0.326 | 0.140 | 0.173 | |
| 6.660 | 6.130 | 6.493 | |
|
| 0.189 | 0.169 | 0.185 |
| R2 | 0.932 | 0.853 | 0.907 |
| RMSE | 0.150 | 0.256 | 0.182 |
Figure 6The relationship between electric current and electrode gap for almond kernels with three different a levels without conveyor belt movement and hot air-assisted heating.
Figure 7Average temperature–time history of five locations (A–E) in Figure 3 of RF heating from 25 to 68 °C, and the equivalent lethal time M for this heating up curve of Aspergillus inoculated in almond kernels with a of 0.854 at 68 °C.
Figure 8Experimental data and predicted survival curves for the target Aspergillus inoculated into almond kernel flour with 0.854 a at 68 °C by combining the Weibull model with Mafart’s modified Bigelow equation.