| Literature DB >> 35681341 |
Qinghua Yao1,2, Minmin Huang1,2, Yunyun Zheng1,2, Meizhen Chen2, Chongyao Huang2, Qiu Lin1,2.
Abstract
Heavy metal is widespread in food and the environment due to multiple origins, raising concerns over their persistent potential health risks. Contamination of multiple heavy metals in tea leaves is frequently reported. However, the dietary exposure risk that heavy metals in Tieguanyin tea (a famous type of oolong tea,) pose to different subpopulations has not been explored. In this study, contaminations of five heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Cr, Cd, and Ni) of concern in Tieguanyin tea were monitored, then the related health risk was assessed for six different subpopulations based on tea brewing experiments and a previous consumption survey. Results show that the mean levels found were as follows: 8.18 mg/kg (Cu), 0.84 mg/kg (Pb), 0.51 mg/kg (Cr), 0.04 mg/kg (Cd), and 1.90 mg/kg (Ni), respectively, and their transfer rates during tea brewing varied within 10.2-70.4%. All estimated daily intakes of individual targeted elements via Tieguanying tea consumption were far below their corresponding tolerable limits. The adjusted hazard index value ranged from 1.1 × 10-2 to 1.7 × 10-2, indicating that exposure to these five elements via drinking Tieguanyin tea would not pose significant non-cancer risks for six subpopulations under the current consumption habit. In addition, the carcinogenic risks associated with heavy metals (Pb, Cd, and Cr) were acceptable because no total cancer risk values exceeded the 10-4 threshold. However, in order to improve consumer protection, we still suggest that considerable attention should be paid to Pb, Ni, and Cd because of their high concentration in infusion, high extraction rate, and major carcinogenic risk contribution, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: heavy metals; risk assessment; subpopulations; tea; transfer rate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35681341 PMCID: PMC9180062 DOI: 10.3390/foods11111593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Working conditions of microwave digestion instrument.
| Steps | Temperature (°C) | Time (min) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120 | 5 |
| 2 | 160 | 10 |
| 3 | 180 | 10 |
Optimized operating for ICP-MS.
| Parameters | Value | Parameters | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radio frequency power | 1.2 kw | Isotopes monitored | 52Cr |
| Plasma gas | 8.0 L/min | 60Ni | |
| Auxiliary gas | 1.1 L/min | 65Cu | |
| Carrier gas | 0.7 L/min | 114Cd | |
| Collision gas | 6.0 L/min | 208Pb |
LOD, LOQ, recovery, and the performance of the analytical method.
| Element | Certified Reference Tea | Recovery for Tea Infusion (%) | LOD (μg L−1) | LOQ (μg L−1) | R2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certified Value | Detected Value | 10 μg L−1 | 50 μg L−1 | 100 μg L−1 | ||||
| Cu | 24 ± 1 | 24.4 ± 0.5 | 110.6 | 110.7 | 114.2 | 0.09 | 0.3 | 0.999 |
| Ni | 5.4 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 103.6 | 96.8 | 98.8 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.999 |
| Pb | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 90.1 | 85.9 | 87.2 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.999 |
| Cd | 0.076 ± 0.004 | 0.077 ± 0.001 | 85.3 | 87.3 | 84.3 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.999 |
| Cr | 0.92 ± 0.20 | 0.92 ± 0.01 | 100.4 | 94.7 | 96.8 | 0.009 | 0.03 | 0.999 |
The contamination levels, oral reference dose (RfD) values and slope factors (Sf) of five potentiality toxic elements (PTEs).
| Range (mg kg−1) | Mean ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 2.65–11.61 | 8.18 ± 2.10 | 40 | |
| Pb | 0.21–2.00 | 0.84 ± 0.40 | 3.57 | 0.0085 |
| Cr | 0.08–1.38 | 0.51 ± 0.28 | 3 | 0.5 |
| Cd | ND-0.11 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1 | 6.3 |
| Ni | 1.02–2.93 | 1.90 ± 0.70 | 20 |
a The RfD of Pb adapted from Yao et al. [15]; others adapted from USEPA [22]. b The Sf values of Cd adapted from Bamuwamye et al. [23]; others adapted from the Integrated Risk Information System of USEPA [24].
Figure 1Released percentage of Cu, Pb, Cr, Cd, and Ni during tea brewing.
Non-carcinogenic hazard quotient of heavy metals due to tea infusion consumption.
| HQ (%) | Adjusted HQ (%) a | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Urban | Rural | Age 18–40 | Age ≥ 41 | Male | Female | Urban | Rural | Age 18–40 | Age ≥ 41 | |
| Cu | 4.7 × 10−3 | 3.1 × 10−3 | 4.0 × 10−3 | 3.7 × 10−3 | 3.7 × 10−3 | 5.0 × 10 3 | 2.0 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−3 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 1.5 × 10−3 | 1.5 × 10−3 | 2.0 × 10−3 |
| Pb | 1.7 × 10−2 | 1.1 × 10−2 | 1.4 × 10−2 | 1.3 × 10−2 | 1.3 × 10−2 | 1.8 × 10−2 | 1.0 × 10−2 | 6.7 × 10−3 | 8.6 × 10−3 | 8.0 × 10−3 | 8.0 × 10−3 | 1.0 × 10−2 |
| Cr | 1.6 × 10−2 | 1.1 × 10−2 | 1.4 × 10−2 | 1.3 × 10−2 | 1.3 × 10−2 | 1.7 × 10−2 | 1.6 × 10−4 | 1.1 × 10−4 | 1.4 × 10−4 | 1.3 × 10−4 | 1.3 × 10−4 | 1.7 × 10−4 |
| Cd | 4.9 × 10−3 | 3.2 × 10−3 | 4.2 × 10−3 | 3.8 × 10−3 | 3.8 × 10−3 | 5.1 × 10−3 | 2.4 × 10−3 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 2.1 × 10−3 | 1.9 × 10−3 | 1.9 × 10−3 | 2.5 × 10−3 |
| Ni | 1.5 × 10−2 | 1.0 × 10−2 | 1.3 × 10−2 | 1.2 × 10−2 | 1.2 × 10−2 | 1.6 × 10−2 | 1.5 × 10−3 | 1.0 × 10−3 | 1.3 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−3 | 1.2 × 10−3 | 1.6 × 10−3 |
|
| 5.8 × 10−2 | 3.8 × 10−2 | 4.9 × 10−2 | 4.6 × 10−2 | 4.6 × 10−2 | 6.1 × 10−2 | 1.6 × 10−2 | 1.1 × 10−2 | 1.4 × 10−2 | 1.3 × 10−2 | 1.3 × 10−2 | 1.7 × 10−2 |
a Adjusted HQ was calculated as HQ multiplying by the bioavailability of the corresponding element.
Figure 2Cancer risk for different subpopulations due to drink tea infusion. Note: * means that the bioavailability of element was considered.