Literature DB >> 35680773

CT angiography-based radiomics as a tool for carotid plaque characterization: a pilot study.

Savino Cilla1, Gabriella Macchia2, Jacopo Lenkowicz3, Elena H Tran3, Antonio Pierro4, Lella Petrella5, Mara Fanelli5, Celestino Sardu6, Alessia Re2, Luca Boldrini7, Luca Indovina8, Carlo Maria De Filippo9, Eugenio Caradonna9, Francesco Deodato2,10, Massimo Massetti11, Vincenzo Valentini7,10, Pietro Modugno12.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: Radiomics is a quantitative method able to analyze a high-throughput extraction of minable imaging features. Herein, we aim to develop a CT angiography-based radiomics analysis and machine learning model for carotid plaques to discriminate vulnerable from no vulnerable plaques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with carotid atherosclerosis were enrolled in this pilot study. At surgery, a binary classification of plaques was adopted ("hard" vs "soft"). Feature extraction was performed using the R software package Moddicom. Pairwise feature interdependencies were evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. A univariate analysis was performed to assess the association between each feature and the plaque classification and chose top-ranked features. The feature predictive value was investigated using binary logistic regression. A stepwise backward elimination procedure was performed to minimize the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The final significant features were used to build the models for binary classification of carotid plaques, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and classification and regression tree analysis (CART). All models were cross-validated using fivefold cross validation. Class-specific accuracy, precision, recall and F-measure evaluation metrics were used to quantify classifier output quality.
RESULTS: A total of 230 radiomics features were extracted from each plaque. Pairwise Spearman correlation between features reported a high level of correlations, with more than 80% correlating with at least one other feature at |ρ|> 0.8. After a stepwise backward elimination procedure, the entropy and volume features were found to be the most significantly associated with the two plaque groups (p < 0.001), with AUCs of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. The best performance was registered by the SVM classifier with the RBF kernel, with accuracy, precision, recall and F-score equal to 86.7, 92.9, 81.3 and 86.7%, respectively. The CART classification tree model for the entropy and volume features model achieved 86.7% well-classified plaques and an AUC of 0.987.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study highlighted the potential of CTA-based radiomics and machine learning to discriminate plaque composition. This new approach has the potential to provide a reliable method to improve risk stratification in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.
© 2022. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; Carotid; Plaques; Radiomics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35680773     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01505-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   6.313


  40 in total

1.  Histological assessment of 526 symptomatic carotid plaques in relation to the nature and timing of ischemic symptoms: the Oxford plaque study.

Authors:  J N E Redgrave; J K Lovett; P J Gallagher; P M Rothwell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Carotid artery plaque morphology and composition in relation to incident cardiovascular events: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Anna E H Zavodni; Bruce A Wasserman; Robyn L McClelland; Antoinette S Gomes; Aaron R Folsom; Joseph F Polak; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Management of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Yinn Cher Ooi; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 4.  Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Tobias Saam; H Rolf Jäger; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami; David Saloner; Bruce A Wasserman; Leo H Bonati; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Change in Carotid Plaque Components: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study With Serial MR Imaging.

Authors:  Laura Pletsch-Borba; Mariana Selwaness; Aad van der Lugt; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04-12

6.  Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; M Eliasziw; S A Gutnikov; A J Fox; D W Taylor; M R Mayberg; C P Warlow; H J M Barnett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Gupta; Hediyeh Baradaran; Andrew D Schweitzer; Hooman Kamel; Ankur Pandya; Diana Delgado; Allison Dunning; Alvin I Mushlin; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  Imaging of the carotid artery vulnerable plaque.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Michele Anzidei; Beatrice Cavallo Marincola; Mario Piga; Eytan Raz; Pier Paolo Bassareo; Alessandro Napoli; Lorenzo Mannelli; Carlo Catalano; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Clinical factors associated with high-risk carotid plaque features as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with established vascular disease (from the AIM-HIGH Study).

Authors:  Xue-Qiao Zhao; Thomas S Hatsukami; Daniel S Hippe; Jie Sun; Niranjan Balu; Daniel A Isquith; John R Crouse; Todd Anderson; John Huston; Nayak Polissar; Kevin O'Brien; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Prediction of Stroke Risk by Detection of Hemorrhage in Carotid Plaques: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.

Authors:  Andreas Schindler; Regina Schinner; Nishaf Altaf; Akram A Hosseini; Richard J Simpson; Lorena Esposito-Bauer; Navneet Singh; Robert M Kwee; Yoshitaka Kurosaki; Sen Yamagata; Kazumichi Yoshida; Susumu Miyamoto; Robert Maggisano; Alan R Moody; Holger Poppert; M Eline Kooi; Dorothee P Auer; Leo H Bonati; Tobias Saam
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.