Literature DB >> 35680700

Texas field crickets (Gryllus texensis) use visual cues to place learn but perform poorly when intra- and extra-maze cues conflict.

Dovid Y Kozlovsky1, Marc-Antoine Poirier2, Ethan Hermer2, Susan M Bertram3, Julie Morand-Ferron2.   

Abstract

Central place foraging field crickets are an ideal system for studying the adaptive value of learning and memory, but more research is needed on ecologically relevant cognition in these invertebrates. Here, we test the visuospatial place learning of Texas field crickets (Gryllus texensis) in a radial arm maze. Our study expands previous work on G. texensis cognition for accuracy measures and extends our previous findings on females to both sexes. Additionally, our study examines whether crickets use intra- or extra-maze cues to locate a food reward using a maze rotation that puts the cues in conflict. We found that male and female crickets improved performance over trials when measured by accuracy variables but not latency variables. Thigmotaxis negatively impacted performance in both sexes. In a reward-absent trial, both male and female crickets demonstrated place memory. When intra- and extra-maze cues conflicted during a rotation trial, crickets' performance was not better than chance. Our rotation results suggest that crickets may experience reciprocal overshadowing of conflicting cues - a result most often seen in other taxa with conflicting multi-modal cues. We conclude that crickets do not rely solely on: (1) a single-cue association, (2) route-following, or (3) their own scent cues to navigate the maze. Instead, male and female Texas field crickets seem to learn the location of the reward using a combination of proximal and distal cues. The possibility to test large numbers of wild-caught or laboratory-reared individuals opens the door to future investigations on the evolutionary ecology of visuospatial learning in these invertebrates.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Insect; Invertebrate; Learning; RAM; Rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35680700     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-022-00532-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.926


  23 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of color vision in insects.

Authors:  A D Briscoe; L Chittka
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Centrophobism/thigmotaxis, a new role for the mushroom bodies in Drosophila.

Authors:  Morgane Besson; Jean-René Martin
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2005-02-15

3.  Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.

Authors:  Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Sublethal exposure of Trogoderma granarium everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) to insecticide-treated netting alters thigmotactic arrestment and olfactory-mediated anemotaxis.

Authors:  Michael J Domingue; Deanna S Scheff; Frank H Arthur; Scott W Myers
Journal:  Pestic Biochem Physiol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.963

5.  Cognitive and affective aspects of thigmotaxis strategy in humans.

Authors:  Janos Kallai; Tamas Makany; Arpad Csatho; Kazmer Karadi; David Horvath; Beatrix Kovacs-Labadi; Robert Jarai; Lynn Nadel; Jake W Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Contribution of sex differences in the acute stress response to sex differences in water maze performance in the rat.

Authors:  Jason Beiko; Rebecca Lander; Elizabeth Hampson; Francis Boon; Donald Peter Cain
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Specialized learning in antlions (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae), pit-digging predators, shortens vulnerable larval stage.

Authors:  Karen L Hollis; Heather Cogswell; Kenzie Snyder; Lauren M Guillette; Elise Nowbahari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Fast learning in free-foraging bumble bees is negatively correlated with lifetime resource collection.

Authors:  Lisa J Evans; Karen E Smith; Nigel E Raine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Are Distal and Proximal Visual Cues Equally Important during Spatial Learning in Mice? A Pilot Study of Overshadowing in the Spatial Domain.

Authors:  Marie Hébert; Jan Bulla; Denis Vivien; Véronique Agin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Spatial memory in insect navigation.

Authors:  Matthew Collett; Lars Chittka; Thomas S Collett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.