Literature DB >> 35680678

Cancer- and cardiac-induced cachexia: same fate through different inflammatory mediators?

Rita Nogueira-Ferreira1, Fábio Sousa-Nunes2,3, Adelino Leite-Moreira2,4, Liliana Moreira-Costa2, Rui Vitorino2,5, Lúcio Lara Santos6, Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves7,8, Rita Ferreira9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is widely recognized as the driving force of cachexia induced by chronic diseases; however, therapies targeting inflammation do not always reverse cachexia. Thus, whether inflammation per se plays an important role in the clinical course of cachectic patients is still a matter of debate. AIMS: To give new insights into cachexia's pathogenesis and diagnosis, we performed a comprehensive literature search on the contribution of inflammatory markers to this syndrome, focusing on the noncommunicable diseases cancer and cardiovascular diseases.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed in PubMed using the keywords ("cancer" OR "cardiac" cachexia AND "human" OR "patient" AND "plasma" or "serum"). A total of 744 studies were retrieved and, from these, 206 were selected for full-text screening. In the end, 98 papers focusing on circulating biomarkers of cachexia were identified, which resulted in a list of 113 different mediators.
RESULTS: Data collected from the literature highlight the contribution of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to cachexia, independently of the underlying condition. Despite not being specific, once the diagnosis of cachexia is established, CRP might help to monitor the effectiveness of anti-cachexia therapies. In cardiac diseases, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), renin, and obestatin might be putative markers of body wasting, whereas in cancer, growth differentiation factor (GDF) 15, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) C seem to be better markers of this syndrome. Independently of the circulating mediators, NF-κB and JAK/STAT signaling pathways play a key role in bridging inflammation with muscle wasting; however, therapies targeting these pathways were not proven effective for all cachectic patients.
CONCLUSION: The critical and integrative analysis performed herein will certainly feed future research focused on the better comprehension of cachexia pathogenesis toward the improvement of its diagnosis and the development of personalized therapies targeting specific cachexia phenotypes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Body wasting; Cancer; Cardiovascular diseases; Inflammation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35680678     DOI: 10.1007/s00011-022-01586-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inflamm Res        ISSN: 1023-3830            Impact factor:   6.986


  133 in total

Review 1.  Systemic inflammation in heart failure--the whys and wherefores.

Authors:  Arne Yndestad; Jan Kristian Damås; Erik Oie; Thor Ueland; Lars Gullestad; Pål Aukrust
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Sarcopenia, cachexia, and muscle performance in heart failure: Review update 2016.

Authors:  Masakazu Saitoh; Junichi Ishida; Wolfram Doehner; Stephan von Haehling; Markus S Anker; Andrew J S Coats; Stefan D Anker; Jochen Springer
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Prognostic importance of weight loss in chronic heart failure and the effect of treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: an observational study.

Authors:  Stefan D Anker; Abdissa Negassa; Andrew J S Coats; Rizwan Afzal; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Jay N Cohn; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Exercise Training as Therapy for Cancer-Induced Cardiac Cachexia.

Authors:  J M M Antunes; Rita M P Ferreira; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 5.  Cancer cachexia: understanding the molecular basis.

Authors:  Josep M Argilés; Sílvia Busquets; Britta Stemmler; Francisco J López-Soriano
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Understanding tumor anabolism and patient catabolism in cancer-associated cachexia.

Authors:  Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera; Alma Chávez-Blanco; Guadalupe Domínguez-Gómez; Alfonso Dueñas-González
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Prevalence of cachexia in chronic heart failure and characteristics of body composition and metabolic status.

Authors:  Heidi Marie Christensen; Caroline Kistorp; Morten Schou; Niels Keller; Bo Zerahn; Jan Frystyk; Peter Schwarz; Jens Faber
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Recent insights on the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches for cardiac cachexia.

Authors:  Telma Martins; Rui Vitorino; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Francisco Amado; José Alberto Duarte; Rita Ferreira
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.281

9.  Validation of the CAchexia SCOre (CASCO). Staging Cancer Patients: The Use of miniCASCO as a Simplified Tool.

Authors:  Josep M Argilés; Angelica Betancourt; Joan Guàrdia-Olmos; Maribel Peró-Cebollero; Francisco J López-Soriano; Clelia Madeddu; Roberto Serpe; Sílvia Busquets
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  Inflammation based regulation of cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Jill K Onesti; Denis C Guttridge
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.