Marina R Filip1, Diana Y Qiu2, Mauro Del Ben3, Jeffrey B Neaton4,5,6. 1. Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom. 2. School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States. 3. Computational Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 4. Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 5. Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 6. Kavli Energy Nano Sciences Institute at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Abstract
Interlayer organic cations in quasi-two-dimensional halide perovskites are a versatile tuning vehicle for the optoelectronic properties of these complex systems, but chemical intuition for this design route is yet to be established. Here, we use density functional theory, the GW approximation, and the Bethe-Salpeter equation approach to understand the contribution of the organic cation to the quasiparticle band gap and exciton binding energy of layered perovskites. We show that organic cations in quasi-two-dimensional perovskites contribute significantly to the dielectric screening in these systems, countering quantum confinement effects on the quasiparticle band gap and the exciton binding energy. Using a simple electrostatics model inspired by parallel-plate capacitors, we decouple the organic cation and inorganic layer contributions to the effective dielectric constants and show that dielectric properties of layered perovskites are broadly tunable via the interlayer cation, providing a direct means of tuning photophysical properties for a variety of applications.
Interlayer organic cations in quasi-two-dimensional halide perovskites are a versatile tuning vehicle for the optoelectronic properties of these complex systems, but chemical intuition for this design route is yet to be established. Here, we use density functional theory, the GW approximation, and the Bethe-Salpeter equation approach to understand the contribution of the organic cation to the quasiparticle band gap and exciton binding energy of layered perovskites. We show that organic cations in quasi-two-dimensional perovskites contribute significantly to the dielectric screening in these systems, countering quantum confinement effects on the quasiparticle band gap and the exciton binding energy. Using a simple electrostatics model inspired by parallel-plate capacitors, we decouple the organic cation and inorganic layer contributions to the effective dielectric constants and show that dielectric properties of layered perovskites are broadly tunable via the interlayer cation, providing a direct means of tuning photophysical properties for a variety of applications.
Layered hybrid organic–inorganic
metal-halide perovskites are a highly promising family of quasi-low-dimensional
heterogeneous semiconductors for optoelectronic applications.[1−8] These materials are generally highly stable in ambient conditions
and can be flexibly synthesized in bulk form,[4,6] exfoliated
to a monolayer,[9] assembled in interfaces
with transition metal dichalcogenides[10,11] or other layered
perovskites,[12,13] or self-assembled in perovskite-nonperovskite
single-crystal heterostructures.[14] The
structural and chemical versatility of layered perovskites is in large
part due to the wide range of organic cations that may be incorporated
between the perovskite layers.[8] However,
this highly attractive feature significantly enhances their structural
and chemical complexity and poses great challenges for the fundamental
study of their optoelectronic properties.Layered lead-halide
perovskites can be thought of as derivative
structures of the three-dimensional (3D) halide perovskites (e.g.,
CH3NH3PbI3[15,16]). Depending on the size, shape, and charge of the organic cation,
layered perovskites can arrange in either flat layers of corner-sharing
inorganic octahedra, more complex corrugated layers, or layers which
include both corner and face-sharing octahedra.[4,6,8,14] Ruddlesden–Popper
(RP) perovskites have a standard chemical formula of A′A2BX3, where A and A′ are
monovalent cations, B is a divalent metal cation, X is a halogen anion,
and n is the number of BX6 octahedra stacked
up in a single layer.[4] In the n = 1 limit, RP perovskites have a chemical formula of A2BX4 and exhibit an effectively 2D behavior, with electronic
coupling between layers suppressed by organic cations.[17] Quantum confinement effects in this case increase
the quasiparticle band gap by more than 1 eV and the exciton binding
energy by up to a factor of 10, as compared to 3D perovskite counterparts.[3] By increasing n from the quasi-2D
limit (n = 1) toward bulk (n = ∞),
quantum confinement effects are gradually reduced, and the optical
absorption onset and exciton binding energies are red-shifted.[18,19]The optoelectronic properties of A2BX4-type
perovskites are highly tunable via partial or total chemical substitution
of the A, B, and X components, in close similarity to their 3D counterparts.[20−29] The optical spectrum blue shifts with decreasing X anion[30] and red shifts from Pb to Sn.[31] As in 3D perovskites, the A-site cations do not contribute
directly to optical transitions close to the onset.[29] Furthermore, as in 3D perovskites,[29,32−36] A-site cations in layered perovskites induce structural changes
on the inorganic octahedral network, which, in turn, modulate the
quasiparticle band gap and charge carrier effective masses.[30,37,38] In contrast, while the A-site
cation does not significantly impact the high frequency dielectric
constant of 3D halide perovskites,[39,40] and implicitly
the binding energy of photoexcited charge carriers,[34,35] experimental reports suggest that altering the organic cations in
layered perovskites may reduce the exciton binding energy by up to
300 meV.[41−44]Advances in density functional theory (DFT)[45] and ab initio many-body perturbation theory
(MBPT)[46,47] within the GW approximation[48] for single-particle excitations and the Bethe-Salpeter
equation (BSE)[49,50] approach for neutral two-particle
excitations have enabled this framework to be successfully employed
to study materials with increasing degrees of complexity, such as
bulk and monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides,[51−53] organic semiconductors,[54] and heterogeneous
metal-halide perovskites.[39,55−57] Prior ab initio calculations of the electronic
structure of layered perovskites have so far been largely focused
on understanding dielectric and quantum confinement effects driven
by the inorganic layer thickness,[58,59] shape,[17,60] and the organic layer[18] and limited to
standard DFT approaches. Due to the structural complexity of layered
halide perovskites, GW+BSE methods have only been
employed in two prior studies focusing on understanding the optical
spectra and exciton binding energy in RP perovskites with n = 1, 2[61] and a model lead-halide
perovskite monolayer with A = Cs.[62] In
addition, ref (63) used
a tight-binding GW+BSE approach to calculate the
exciton binding energies of RP perovskites with n up to 5, highlighting the nonhydrogenic nature of excitons in these
compounds.In this work, we perform GW+BSE
calculations to
understand the contribution from organic cations to screening photogenerated
electron–hole pairs in three RP lead-bromide perovskite semiconductors
with n = 1, BA2PbBr4 (BA =
butylammonium), PMA2PbBr4 (PMA = phenylmethylammonium),
and NMA2PbBr4 (NMA = naphthalenemethylammonium).
We show that unlike in 3D perovskites, the organic cation makes a
nontrivial contribution to the high frequency dielectric screening,
which impacts both the quasiparticle band gap and the exciton binding
energy. We quantify this contribution using a simple electrostatic
model inspired by standard formulas for parallel and series capacitors
and consistent with prior literature.[41,64] We use this
model to reveal how the organic cation can be designed to increase
the effective dielectric constant of the layered perovskite, either
by increasing the effective dielectric constant of the cation layer
itself or by reducing the distance between the inorganic layers.We start our study with PMA2PbBr4. In Figure b, we show the electronic
band structure calculated using the Quantum Espresso code[65,66] and the Perdew-Burke-Erzerhof parametrization of the generalized
gradient approximation (DFT/PBE)[67] including
spin–orbit coupling (SOC),[100,200] for the experimental
crystal structure of PMA2PbBr4 as reported in
ref (30) (see the SI for details). PMA2PbBr4 has a direct band gap at Γ, and PMA cations contribute to
bands more than 1 eV away from the conduction and valence band edge
states (see Figure b), in line with previous DFT calculations.[17,19] Therefore, one could naively exclude any association of interlayer
organic cations with the optical absorption onset of these systems.
Figure 1
Summary
of our DFT and GW+BSE calculations for
PMA2PbBr4. a. Polyhedral model
of the experimental PMA2PbBr4 reported in ref (30). b. Electronic
band structure and projected density of states calculated within DFT/PBE
including spin–orbit coupling for PMA2PbBr4 (left panel) and Cs2PMAPbBr4 (right panel). The zero of energy is set
to the valence band edge. c. Optical absorption spectra
calculated within the independent particle approximation (dotted lines)
and the BSE (continuous lines) calculated for PMA2PbBr4 (dark red) and Cs2PMAPbBr4 (dark blue). Both optical
absorption spectra are blue-shifted by 0.6 eV in order to match the
onset of the experimental optical absorption spectra (gray disks)
reported in ref (30). d. Energies of bound neutral excitations in PMA2PbBr4 (left panel) and Cs2PMAPbBr4 (right panel). Bright
states are represented with dark red (blue), and dark states are represented
in gray. The zero energy level is set to the quasiparticle band gap.
Labels “L” and “IL” refer to layer and
interlayer states, respectively. e. Electron localization
probability corresponding to the lowest excited state (L-state) and
the ninth excited state (IL-state) when the hole is fixed on a Pb
atom in the middle perovskite layer for PMA2PbBr4.
Summary
of our DFT and GW+BSE calculations for
PMA2PbBr4. a. Polyhedral model
of the experimental PMA2PbBr4 reported in ref (30). b. Electronic
band structure and projected density of states calculated within DFT/PBE
including spin–orbit coupling for PMA2PbBr4 (left panel) and Cs2PMAPbBr4 (right panel). The zero of energy is set
to the valence band edge. c. Optical absorption spectra
calculated within the independent particle approximation (dotted lines)
and the BSE (continuous lines) calculated for PMA2PbBr4 (dark red) and Cs2PMAPbBr4 (dark blue). Both optical
absorption spectra are blue-shifted by 0.6 eV in order to match the
onset of the experimental optical absorption spectra (gray disks)
reported in ref (30). d. Energies of bound neutral excitations in PMA2PbBr4 (left panel) and Cs2PMAPbBr4 (right panel). Bright
states are represented with dark red (blue), and dark states are represented
in gray. The zero energy level is set to the quasiparticle band gap.
Labels “L” and “IL” refer to layer and
interlayer states, respectively. e. Electron localization
probability corresponding to the lowest excited state (L-state) and
the ninth excited state (IL-state) when the hole is fixed on a Pb
atom in the middle perovskite layer for PMA2PbBr4.We calculate electronic and optical
excitations of PMA2PbBr4 within the GW+BSE framework, as
implemented in the BerkeleyGW code[68−70] (see the SI for computational details and convergence
studies). Using a “single-shot” G0W0 approach, employing the Godby-Needs
plasmon-pole model and the static remainder approximation[300,400], and starting from DFT/PBE including SOC, we find a quasiparticle
band gap of 3 eV. In Figure b, we show the GW+BSE optical absorption
spectrum, in comparison with the independent particle spectrum and
with experiment. The optical spectrum exhibits a sharp peak at the
onset of absorption, 467 meV below the quasiparticle band gap, reflecting
strong electron–hole interactions. The line shape of our calculated
optical absorption spectrum, which includes an empirical 0.1 eV broadening,
is in very good agreement with experimental data reported in ref (30), as shown in Figure c. However, the position
of the main excitonic peak is red-shifted with respect to experiment
by 0.6 eV; this discrepancy is in line with previous G0W0 calculations reported
for 3D perovskites and has been associated with the G0W0 starting-point dependence,
which can be partially resolved through self-consistency or using
hybrid functional starting points.[71−75] In addition, our convergence studies predict a systematic
underestimation of the band gap in the range of 0.1–0.2 eV
(see the SI). To reduce computational effort,
while capturing the physics, we restrict our level of theory for the
quasiparticle energies to the single-shot G0W0@PBE approach and use empirical scissor
corrections only to compare experimental and computed optical absorption
spectra.In Figure d, we
show the fine structure of the computed bound excited states, i.e.,
those below the quasiparticle band gap; of main interest are the first
16 excited states which correspond to transitions between the 4 degenerate
conduction and valence band edge states. The first 8 states are grouped
in the lower energy region between −0.5 eV and −0.4
eV and correspond to excitons localized within the PbBr4 perovskite layer (shown in Figure e); we label this group of states with L. These states
include three transitions which are optically inactive (dark), and
five which are optically active (bright) and contribute to the main
excitonic peak of the optical absorption spectra (Figure c). The lowest excited state
is dark, with an energy approximately 30 meV below the second highest
bright state, in very good agreement with the measured fine structure
of closely related PEA2PbBr4 (PEA = phenylethylammonium).[76] Four of the five bright states are nearly degenerate
and optically active for a light polarization direction along the
PbBr4 plane, while the fifth one (23 meV above) is optically
active for light polarized in the direction perpendicular to the PbBr4 layer; this is consistent with recent experiments reporting
the occurrence of bright in- and out-of-plane excitons in RP perovskites.[64,76−78] The 8 states in the second group, occurring just
above −0.2 eV (Figure d), are all nearly degenerate and dark; in these states, photoexcited
electrons are localized in a different layer from the holes (An example
of one of the eight states is shown in Figure e.), and we label these with IL.Next,
we probe the contribution of the PMA cation layer to computed
excitons described above by investigating how these properties change
in a fictitious scenario when the organic cation, PMA, is replaced
by a monatomic cation, Cs, without changing the structure of the PbBr4 octahedral layers; this structure is labeled as Cs2PMAPbBr4. As expected, the DFT-PBE band structure of Cs2PMAPbBr4 displays nearly
identical band edges to PMA2PbBr4, since the
A-site cations do not contribute directly to these states. Furthermore,
optical spectra for Cs2PMAPbBr4 and PMA2PbBr4 have
onsets at very close energies. The quasiparticle band gap and exciton
binding energy of Cs2PMAPbBr4 are blue-shifted with respect to PMA2PbBr4 by 0.2 eV, while the order of the first 16
excited states states discussed above remains qualitatively similar.
The difference in the exciton binding energies computed in the two
cases correlates with the dielectric constants of the two model layered
perovskites (2.8 for PMA vs 2.4 for CsPMA), and the ratio
of the binding energies (0.69) is very close to the squared inverse
ratio of the high frequency dielectric constants, 0.73, as expected
from the hydrogenic model.[79] This contribution
from the PMA cation is in stark contrast to 3D halide perovskites.[35] It is important to note that our focus in this
analysis is on the high frequency (electronic) dielectric screening,
and all our calculations ignore the contribution to screening arising
from phonons, which has been recently shown to reduce exciton binding
energies of semiconductors and insulators by up to 50%,[39] when the exciton binding energies and the LO
phonon energies have similar energies. In n = 1 Ruddlesden–Popper
perovskites, exciton binding energies can reach values up to 10–20
times larger than characteristic phonon frequencies,[80] suggesting that the phonon contribution to screening is
negligible in this case.Figure and the arguments
above strongly
suggest that organic cation layers are important contributors to the
dielectric screening of excitations in layered perovskites. To understand
this contribution, we perform a systematic analysis of layered perovskites
with A-site cations of different sizes and shapes: ethylammonium (EA),
butylammonium (BA), phenylmethylammonium (PMA), and naphthalenemethylammonium
(NMA). The size of the organic cation determines the interlayer distance, d, between the PbBr4 layers and the degree of
octahedral tilting within each layer, two structural parameters that
are expected to impact optoelectronic properties.[30,81] In the following, we will study the influence of both of these parameters
separately, using model and experimental layered perovskite structures.Quasiparticle
band gaps (a), exciton binding energies (b), and
optical dielectric constants for the in- and out-of-plane polarization
directions (c) calculated within the GW+BSE framework
for model structures without octahedral tilting including organic
cations EA, BA, PMA, and NMA (dark red data points) and with Cs replacing
the organic cations for the same interlayer distance (dark blue data
points). The dark blue and dark red lines in all plots are guides
to the eye. The gray lines in (c) correspond to fits of the dielectric
constants as a function of the interlayer distance, as described in
the main text and SI. The inset of (c)
depicts the dependence of the fractional difference between the quasiparticle
band gap and exciton binding energy on the cation dielectric constant
calculated as described in the main text. The continuous lines in
the inset correspond to quadratic and linear fits of the data, as
discussed in the main text.We first analyze the role
of interlayer separation exclusively,
by constructing a set of model structures with undistorted PbBr4 layers (Pb-Br bond length of 2.937 Å, as in Ref. (500)) which do not exhibit
any octahedral tilting, and are separated by inter-layer distances
reported in Refs. (30 and 81) and Ref. 3 (see the SI for details); we compare calculations performed on these
model structures constructed with the organic cation and with Cs.
For this analysis, we perform GW+BSE calculations
for 8 distinct structures (see the SI for
details). As in Figure , DFT/PBE band gaps are independent of the interlayer distance or
the A-site cation type (see Table S1 of the SI). Similarly, G0W0 quasiparticle band gaps and GW+BSE exciton
binding energies vary by less than 50 meV across the five model structures
with different organic A-site cations. On the other hand, upon replacement
of the organic A-site cation by Cs, our calculated quasiparticle band
gaps increase with an increasing interlayer distance over a range
of up to 0.3 eV, as shown in Figure a, and exciton binding energies follow the same trend
spanning a range of up to 0.4 eV (Figure b).
Figure 2
Quasiparticle
band gaps (a), exciton binding energies (b), and
optical dielectric constants for the in- and out-of-plane polarization
directions (c) calculated within the GW+BSE framework
for model structures without octahedral tilting including organic
cations EA, BA, PMA, and NMA (dark red data points) and with Cs replacing
the organic cations for the same interlayer distance (dark blue data
points). The dark blue and dark red lines in all plots are guides
to the eye. The gray lines in (c) correspond to fits of the dielectric
constants as a function of the interlayer distance, as described in
the main text and SI. The inset of (c)
depicts the dependence of the fractional difference between the quasiparticle
band gap and exciton binding energy on the cation dielectric constant
calculated as described in the main text. The continuous lines in
the inset correspond to quadratic and linear fits of the data, as
discussed in the main text.
The large difference between band
gaps and exciton binding energies
for structures with and without the organic cations can be explained
from a comparison of the dielectric constants of the two types of
structures (Figure c). In Figure c,
we plot both the in-plane and out-of-plane polarization directions,
ε∥∞ and ε⊥∞, respectively, in order to account for the anisotropy
of these systems. In all cases, the A-site cation layer contributes
to an increase in the dielectric constants (both in- and out-of-plane)
by up to a factor of 2, with the contribution increasing as the interlayer
distance increases, thereby reducing the quasiparticle band gap and
the exciton binding energies.The dielectric constants shown
in Figure c include
a contribution from the inorganic
layer ε∥(⊥)∞;L and the organic cation layer ε∥(⊥)∞;A. To decouple these contributions from the bulk dielectric constant
we calculated within the random phase approximation (RPA),[84,85] we develop a simple model for the effective dielectric constant,
inspired from the elementary formulas for in-series and in-parallel
capacitors, equivalent to previous approaches described in the literature[41,64] (see the SI for details). We first extract
the dielectric constantand thickness (dL) of the PbBr4 layer , and the dielectric constant of
the cation layer by fitting the model expressions to the dielectric
constants obtained for the Cs-based model structures to obtain dL = 7.41 Å (close to the width of a PbBr4 octahedron of 5.9 Å), ε⊥∞;L = 5.81 and ε∥∞;L = 4.22 (consistent with 3D lead-bromide perovskites[39]), and ε⊥(∥)∞;A ∼ 0.99 (consistent with
vacuum permittivity).Using this simple model, we extract the
dielectric constants corresponding
to the layers with different cation species given in Table . The ratio of exciton binding
energies and quasiparticle band gaps calculated
for structures with and without organic cations correlates quadratically
and linearly with the average dielectric constant of the organic cation
layer, respectively, consistent with the assumption that organic cations
screen charge carriers in layered halide perovskites (see the inset
of Figure c). Interestingly,
the dielectric constants of the organic cation layers calculated with
this fitting procedure follow a very similar trend to those calculated
using the Clausius–Mosotti relation[86] and molecular polarizabilities calculated within the time-dependent
density functional perturbation theory framework (TD-DFPT),[82,83] at the RPA level. The Clausius–Mosotti dielectric constants
consistently overestimate first-principles results; we tentatively
assign this difference to the absence of effects emerging from small
intermolecular interactions or to inaccuracies in estimating the organic
layer volume (which does not take into account interpenetration between
the inorganic and organic layers). Despite this systematic discrepancy,
the agreement between the two independently calculated trends suggests
that it may be possible to estimate dielectric constants for the organic
cation layers without the need for computationally demanding GW calculations.
Table 1
Cation Layer Dielectric Constants
Calculated Using the Dielectric Model Described in the Main Text and
the SI (Columns 2–4), and the Clausius-Mosotti Relation (Column
5)
component
ε⊥∞
ε∥∞
εave∞
εave;CM∞
EA
1.27
1.52
1.43
1.74
BA
1.53
1.79
1.70
1.94
PMA
1.86
1.81
1.82
2.11
NMA
2.36
1.76
1.93
2.40
inorganic layer
5.81
4.22
4.64
N/A
(a) Optical absorption spectra calculated for
the experimental
structures of BA2PbBr4 (red), PMA2PbBr4 (yellow), and NMA2PbBr4 (green)
as described in detail in the SI within
the GW+BSE approach. Dotted lines mark the quasiparticle
band gaps in each case. (b) Comparison between the mean field DFT,
optical, quasiparticle, and experimental band gaps for BA2PbBr4 (red), PMA2PbBr4 (yellow),
and NMA2PbBr4 (green) and the band gaps calculated
for the model untilted layered perovskites (gray data points). The
band gaps corresponding to the model layered perovskites are obtained
as an average of the band gaps shown in Figure . Experimental optical band gaps are read
from the positions of the main excitonic peaks in the optical absorption
spectra measured at room temperature, as reported in ref (600) for BA2PbBr4 and ref (30) for PMA2PbBr4 and averaged over values from
refs (30 and 87) for NMA2PbBr4.In Figure a, we
show optical spectra calculated within the GW+BSE
approach for experimental structures of BA2PbBr4, PMA2PbBr4, and NMA2PbBr4, (see SI for details. (300)) which exhibit increasing Pb–Br–Pb bond angles
as the cation size increases (see Figure b). Unlike the model case, excitonic peaks
blue shift as the size of the cation increases. The same trend is
followed by the band gaps (both from DFT-PBE and G0W0), with an almost linear
correlation with the magnitude of the in-plane Pb–Br–Pb
bond angles, in very good agreement with previous computational studies
of layered perovskites,[88] three-dimensional
perovskites,[29,89] and experiment (Figure b). In close agreement with Figure b, we find that the
exciton binding energy is largely independent of the cation type for
the three experimental structures analyzed here. Furthermore, exciton
binding energies are systematically 20% larger than those obtained
for the model structures, in part due to the increase in charge carrier
effective masses with increasing octahedral tilting; this effect has
been explicitly computed in previous studies both for 3D perovskites[29,89] as well as in layered perovskites.[36]
Figure 3
(a) Optical absorption spectra calculated for
the experimental
structures of BA2PbBr4 (red), PMA2PbBr4 (yellow), and NMA2PbBr4 (green)
as described in detail in the SI within
the GW+BSE approach. Dotted lines mark the quasiparticle
band gaps in each case. (b) Comparison between the mean field DFT,
optical, quasiparticle, and experimental band gaps for BA2PbBr4 (red), PMA2PbBr4 (yellow),
and NMA2PbBr4 (green) and the band gaps calculated
for the model untilted layered perovskites (gray data points). The
band gaps corresponding to the model layered perovskites are obtained
as an average of the band gaps shown in Figure . Experimental optical band gaps are read
from the positions of the main excitonic peaks in the optical absorption
spectra measured at room temperature, as reported in ref (600) for BA2PbBr4 and ref (30) for PMA2PbBr4 and averaged over values from
refs (30 and 87) for NMA2PbBr4.
Finally, we return to the dielectric model of Figure c to illustrate how the choice
of the organic cation can tune the dielectric properties of layered
perovskites. In Figure , we visualize the dependence of the effective dielectric constant
in two cases: (i) with dL = 7.41 Å
and εave∞; L = 4.64 fixed and (ii) with dA = 9.26
Å and εave∞; A = 1.82 (PMA) fixed. The most effective route
to tuning the effective dielectric constant, according to our model,
is by modifying the dielectric constant of the organic cation layer;
this is in stark contrast to 3D perovskites. For example, doubling
the dielectric constant of the PMA layer could increase the effective
dielectric constant of a layered perovskite by up to 50% without changing
the inorganic layer chemistry. By contrast, scanning through expected
dielectric constants of inorganic layers (corresponding to chloride,
bromide, and iodide perovskites) we find that the effective dielectric
constants are much less sensitive to the dielectric properties and
size of the inorganic layer. This indicates that the exciton binding
energies of layered perovskites with different halogen compositions
should be mostly dictated by the curvature of the conduction and valence
band edges and less so by the dielectric properties of the inorganic
layer. Our results are in line with recent experimental studies implementing
cations which are highly polar,[43] including
heavier ions[44] or including two ammonium
groups;[90] refs (43 and 44) report a significant reduction in the exciton binding energy, as
qualitatively predicted by the simple model depicted in Figure .
Figure 4
(a) Effective dielectric
constant of a hypothetical lead-bromide
layered perovskite with the width of the inorganic layer, dL = 7.41 Å, and the average dielectric
constant of the inorganic layer, εave∞;L = 4.64, as a function of the width and dielectric constant of the
organic layer. The empty circles correspond to calculated values of
the model EA2PbBr4, BA2PbBr4, PMA2PbBr4, and NMA2PbBr4, and the filled disk corresponds to calculated values for the experimental
structures of the latter three layered perovskites. The points marked
by crosses correspond to dielectric constants calculated for model
structures in which the organic cation is replaced by Cs. (b) Effective
dielectric constant of a hypothetical layered perovskite with PMA
as the organic layer, as a function of the inorganic layer thickness
and dielectric constant. The purple disk corresponds to the case of
PMA2PbBr4 (εave∞;A = 1.82 and an inorganic layer thickness of 7.41 Å). The effective
dielectric constant in both (a) and (b) is defined as εeff–1 = (2ε∥–1 + ε⊥–1)/3, and we assume that dielectric constants of the
organic and inorganic layers are isotropic (ε∥∞;A(L) ∼ ε⊥∞;A(L) ∼ εave∞;A(L)).
(a) Effective dielectric
constant of a hypothetical lead-bromide
layered perovskite with the width of the inorganic layer, dL = 7.41 Å, and the average dielectric
constant of the inorganic layer, εave∞;L = 4.64, as a function of the width and dielectric constant of the
organic layer. The empty circles correspond to calculated values of
the model EA2PbBr4, BA2PbBr4, PMA2PbBr4, and NMA2PbBr4, and the filled disk corresponds to calculated values for the experimental
structures of the latter three layered perovskites. The points marked
by crosses correspond to dielectric constants calculated for model
structures in which the organic cation is replaced by Cs. (b) Effective
dielectric constant of a hypothetical layered perovskite with PMA
as the organic layer, as a function of the inorganic layer thickness
and dielectric constant. The purple disk corresponds to the case of
PMA2PbBr4 (εave∞;A = 1.82 and an inorganic layer thickness of 7.41 Å). The effective
dielectric constant in both (a) and (b) is defined as εeff–1 = (2ε∥–1 + ε⊥–1)/3, and we assume that dielectric constants of the
organic and inorganic layers are isotropic (ε∥∞;A(L) ∼ ε⊥∞;A(L) ∼ εave∞;A(L)).In conclusion, we have
presented a comprehensive first-principles
analysis of the optoelectronic properties of several organic–inorganic
Ruddlesden–Popper layered lead-halide perovskites. We have
shown that unlike their three-dimensional counterparts, in layered
perovskites the organic cations play a key role in the optical properties
of these materials, through contributions to the dielectric screening
of photogenerated carriers within the layers. Using a set of simplified
model structures, we have quantified this contribution, calculated
the dielectric constant corresponding to the organic cation layer,
and shown that dielectric screening originating with the organic cation
counterbalances quantum confinement effects and acts to reduce the
exciton binding energy as compared to inorganic monocations. This
intuition was confirmed by calculations for experimental structures
of BA2PbBr4, PMA2PbBr4, and NMA2PbBr4, which showed that octahedral
tilting mainly contributes to shift the position of the optical absorption
onset but does not impact the dielectric properties of layered perovskites
significantly. Finally, we used a simple model to predict that the
effective dielectric constant of layered perovskites can be significantly
enhanced by increasing the dielectric constant of the organic cation
or decreasing the distance between the inorganic layers. Thereby,
the interlayer organic cations could potentially facilitate the reduction
of exciton binding energies more efficiently than the chemical composition
of the inorganic layers, as previously expected from their 3D counterparts.
The chemical intuition outlined in this work can provide a reliable
pathway toward the development of efficient optoelectronic devices
implementing layered hybrid organic–inorganic halide perovskites.
Authors: Michael L Aubrey; Abraham Saldivar Valdes; Marina R Filip; Bridget A Connor; Kurt P Lindquist; Jeffrey B Neaton; Hemamala I Karunadasa Journal: Nature Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Grant Walters; Louis Haeberlé; Rafael Quintero-Bermudez; Julien Brodeur; Stéphane Kéna-Cohen; Edward H Sargent Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 6.475