Literature DB >> 35679476

Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

Paola Ghione1,2, M Lia Palomba2, Anik R Patel3, Sabela Bobillo4, Kevin Deighton5, Caron A Jacobson6, Myrna Nahas3, Anthony J Hatswell5, A Scott Jung3, Steve Kanters7, Julia Thornton Snider3, Sattva S Neelapu8, Maria Teresa Ribeiro9, M Alan Brookhart10,11, Herve Ghesquieres12, John Radford13, John G Gribben14.   

Abstract

In the pivotal ZUMA-5 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Here, outcomes from ZUMA-5 are compared with the international SCHOLAR-5 cohort, which applied key ZUMA-5 trial eligibility criteria simulating randomized controlled trial conditions. SCHOLAR-5 data were extracted from institutions in 5 countries, and from 1 historical clinical trial, for r/r FL patients who initiated a third or higher line of therapy after July 2014. Patient characteristics were balanced through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weighting. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were compared using weighted odds ratios. The 143 ScHOLAR-5 patients reduced to an effective sample of 85 patients after SMR weighting vs 86 patients in ZUMA-5. Median follow-up time was 25.4 and 23.3 months for SCHOLAR-5 and ZUMA-5. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in SCHOLAR-5 were 59.8 months and 12.7 months and not reached in ZUMA-5. Hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.83) and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.18-0.49). The ORR and CR rate were 49.9% and 29.9% in SCHOLAR-5 and 94.2% and 79.1% in ZUMA-5, for odds ratios of 16.2 (95% CI, 5.6-46.9) and 8.9 (95% CI, 4.3-18.3). Compared with available therapies, axi-cel demonstrated an improvement in meaningful clinical endpoints, suggesting axi-cel addresses an important unmet need for r/r FL patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03105336.
© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35679476     DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021014375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   25.476


  3 in total

Review 1.  Tumor buster - where will the CAR-T cell therapy 'missile' go?

Authors:  Chunrun Qu; Hao Zhang; Hui Cao; Lanhua Tang; Haoyang Mo; Fangkun Liu; Liyang Zhang; Zhenjie Yi; Lifu Long; Luzhe Yan; Zeyu Wang; Nan Zhang; Peng Luo; Jian Zhang; Zaoqu Liu; Weijie Ye; Zhixiong Liu; Quan Cheng
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 41.444

2.  New Indications and platforms for CAR-T therapy in lymphomas beyond DLBCL.

Authors:  Madiha Iqbal; Bipin N Savani; Mehdi Hamadani
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 3.  CAR T-Based Therapies in Lymphoma: A Review of Current Practice and Perspectives.

Authors:  Semira Sheikh; Denis Migliorini; Noémie Lang
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.