Literature DB >> 35678233

Clinical and immune correlate results from a phase 1b study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor mocetinostat with ipilimumab and nivolumab in unresectable stage III/IV melanoma.

Jeffrey S Weber1, Benjamin A Levinson2, Andressa S Laino1, Anna C Pavlick1, David M Woods3.   

Abstract

Checkpoint immunotherapies (CPIs) have improved outcomes for metastatic melanoma patients, with objective response rates to combination ipilimumab and nivolumab of ~58%. Preclinical data suggest that histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition enhances antitumor immune activity and may augment CPI. In a phase Ib open-label pilot trial (NCT03565406), patients with therapy-naive metastatic melanoma were treated with the class I/IV HDAC inhibitor mocetinostat orally three times a week in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by 12-week maintenance cycles of nivolumab every 2 weeks and mocetinostat at the same dose and schedule as induction. The endpoints of the trial were safety, definition of a recommended phase 2 dose, preliminary assessment of response, and correlative marker determination. Patient PBMC and serum samples collected at baseline and on-treatment were assessed by flow cytometry and Luminex assays for immune correlates. Ten patients were treated: nine with 70-mg and one with 50-mg mocetinostat. In the 70-mg cohort, eight patients had objective responses. The patient in the 50-mg cohort had an early progression of disease. All patients had grade 2 or higher toxicities, and six had grades 3 and 4 toxicities. Patient PBMC showed significant decreases in myeloid-derived suppressor cells and trends towards reduced anti-inflammatory monocyte phenotypes. Patient serum showed significant upregulation of granzyme A and TNF and trends towards increased granzyme B and IFNγ. Collectively, combining CPI and mocetinostat had favorable response rates but with high levels of toxicity. Assessment of immune correlates supports a shift away from immunosuppressive phenotypes towards enhanced immune responses.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35678233      PMCID: PMC9444873          DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.199


  30 in total

Review 1.  Clinical studies of histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Authors:  H Miles Prince; Mark J Bishton; Simon J Harrison
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Combining immunotherapy and targeted therapies in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Matthew Vanneman; Glenn Dranoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors decrease Toll-like receptor-mediated activation of proinflammatory gene expression by impairing transcription factor recruitment.

Authors:  Konrad A Bode; Kate Schroder; David A Hume; Timothy Ravasi; Klaus Heeg; Matthew J Sweet; Alexander H Dalpke
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Class I histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat suppresses regulatory T cells and enhances immunotherapies in renal and prostate cancer models.

Authors:  Li Shen; Michael Ciesielski; Swathi Ramakrishnan; Kiersten M Miles; Leigh Ellis; Paula Sotomayor; Protul Shrikant; Robert Fenstermaker; Roberto Pili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Action mechanisms of histone deacetylase inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Yoichi Imai; Yoshiro Maru; Junji Tanaka
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 6.716

6.  Classification of M1/M2-polarized human macrophages by label-free hyperspectral reflectance confocal microscopy and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Francesca R Bertani; Pamela Mozetic; Marco Fioramonti; Michele Iuliani; Giulia Ribelli; Francesco Pantano; Daniele Santini; Giuseppe Tonini; Marcella Trombetta; Luca Businaro; Stefano Selci; Alberto Rainer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evaluation of Two Dosing Regimens for Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: Results From the Phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 511 Trial.

Authors:  Celeste Lebbé; Nicolas Meyer; Laurent Mortier; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Caroline Robert; Piotr Rutkowski; Alexander M Menzies; Thomas Eigentler; Paolo A Ascierto; Michael Smylie; Dirk Schadendorf; Mazhar Ajaz; Inge Marie Svane; Rene Gonzalez; Linda Rollin; Jennifer Lord-Bessen; Abdel Saci; Elena Grigoryeva; Jacopo Pigozzo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  HDAC Inhibitor, CG-745, Enhances the Anti-Cancer Effect of Anti-PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor by Modulation of the Immune Microenvironment.

Authors:  Young-Dae Kim; Sang-Min Park; Hae Chan Ha; A Reum Lee; Heeyoung Won; Hyunju Cha; Sangsook Cho; Joong Myung Cho
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Phase I Study of Entinostat and Nivolumab with or without Ipilimumab in Advanced Solid Tumors (ETCTN-9844).

Authors:  Evanthia T Roussos Torres; Christine Rafie; Chenguang Wang; David Lim; Adam Brufsky; Patricia LoRusso; Joseph Paul Eder; Vincent Chung; Melinda Downs; Molly Geare; Richard Piekarz; Howard Streicher; Leslie Anforth; Michelle A Rudek; Qingfeng Zhu; Sepideh Besharati; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Robert A Anders; Vered Stearns; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Roisin M Connolly
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Circulating CD14+CD163+CD206+ M2 Monocytes Are Increased in Patients with Early Stage of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Jie Hou; Manli Zhang; Yuhong Ding; Xinrui Wang; Tao Li; Pujun Gao; Yanfang Jiang
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.