Literature DB >> 35677842

Laboratory study of physical barrier efficiency for worker protection against SARS-CoV-2 while standing or sitting.

Jacob Bartels1, Cheryl Fairfield Estill1, I-Chen Chen1, Dylan Neu1.   

Abstract

Transparent barriers were installed as a response to the SARS-COV-2 pandemic in many customer-facing industries. Transparent barriers are an engineering control that intercept particles traveling between customers and workers. Information on the effectiveness of these barriers against aerosols is limited. In this study, a cough simulator was used to represent a cough from a customer. Two optical particle counters were used (one on each side of the barrier, labeled customer and worker) to determine the number of particles that migrated around a transparent barrier. Ten configurations were tested with six replicates for both sitting and standing scenarios, representing nail salons and grocery stores, respectively. Barrier efficiency was calculated using a ratio of the particle count results (customer/worker). Barriers had better efficiency (up to 93%) when its top was 9 to 39 cm above cough height and its width was at least 91 cm. Barriers that extended 91 cm above table height for both scenarios blocked 71% or more of the particles between 0.35-0.725 μm and 68% for particles between 1 to 3 μm. A barrier that blocked an initial cough was effective at reducing particle counts. While the width of the barriers was not as significant as the height in determining barrier efficiency it is important that a barrier be placed where interactions between customers and workers are most frequent. Bystander exposure was not taken into consideration along with other limitations.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35677842      PMCID: PMC9170184          DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2021.2020210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol        ISSN: 0278-6826            Impact factor:   4.809


  7 in total

1.  Computational fluid dynamics study on the influence of an alternate ventilation configuration on the possible flow path of infectious cough aerosols in a mock airborne infection isolation room.

Authors:  Deepthi Sharan Thatiparti; Urmila Ghia; Kenneth R Mead
Journal:  Sci Technol Built Environ       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Efficacy of an ambulance ventilation system in reducing EMS worker exposure to airborne particles from a patient cough aerosol simulator.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Tia L McClelland; Dylan T Neu; Anna Mnatsakanova; Stephen B Martin; Kenneth R Mead; John D Noti
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  A Cough Aerosol Simulator for the Study of Disease Transmission by Human Cough-Generated Aerosols.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Jeffrey S Reynolds; Jonathan V Szalajda; John D Noti; Donald H Beezhold
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.908

4.  Quantity and size distribution of cough-generated aerosol particles produced by influenza patients during and after illness.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; Terri A Pearce; Judith B Hudnall; Kristina A Davis; Stephen M Davis; Melanie A Fisher; Rashida Khakoo; Jan E Palmer; Karen E Clark; Ismail Celik; Christopher C Coffey; Francoise M Blachere; Donald H Beezhold
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  The role of particle size in aerosolised pathogen transmission: a review.

Authors:  Jan Gralton; Euan Tovey; Mary-Louise McLaws; William D Rawlinson
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.072

6.  Household COVID-19 risk and in-person schooling.

Authors:  Justin Lessler; M Kate Grabowski; Kyra H Grantz; Elena Badillo-Goicoechea; C Jessica E Metcalf; Carly Lupton-Smith; Andrew S Azman; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 63.714

7.  Efficacy of face shields against cough aerosol droplets from a cough simulator.

Authors:  William G Lindsley; John D Noti; Francoise M Blachere; Jonathan V Szalajda; Donald H Beezhold
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary function testing during SARS-CoV-2: An ANZSRS/TSANZ position statement.

Authors:  Brigitte M Borg; Christian Osadnik; Keith Adam; David G Chapman; Catherine E Farrow; Vanda Glavas; Kerry Hancock; Celia J Lanteri; Ewan G Morris; Nicholas Romeo; Elena K Schneider-Futschik; Hiran Selvadurai
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 6.175

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.