| Literature DB >> 35677689 |
Anzhu Wang1,2, Zhendong Li3, Sun Zhuo3, Feng Gao1,2, Hongwei Zhang1,2, Zhibo Zhang1,4, Gaocan Ren1,2, Xiaochang Ma1,5.
Abstract
Purpose: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have cardiorenal protective effects regardless of whether they are combined with type 2 diabetes mellitus, but their specific pharmacological mechanisms remain undetermined. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: cardiorenal protection; chronic kidney disease; heart failure; sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35677689 PMCID: PMC9169967 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.857952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Large clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin | EMPA-REG ( | 7,020 T2DM patients with CVD and Egfr ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 3.1 years | MACE |
| EMPEROR-Reduced ( | 3,730 patients with HFrEF | 16 months | CVD death or hospitalization for HF, 0.75 (0.65–0.86), | |
| EMPEROR-Preserved ( | 5,988 HF patients with EF > 40% | 26.2 months | CVD death or hospitalization for HF, 0.79 (0.69–0.90), | |
| Canagliflozin | CREDENCE ( | 4,401 patients with T2DM and CKD | 2.62 years | ESKD |
| CANVAS ( | 10,142 T2DM patients with CVD risk factors, eGFR≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 126.1 weeks | MACE | |
| Dapagliflozin | DECLARE-TIMI ( | 17,160 T2DM patients with ASCVD or CVD risk factor | 4.2 years | MACE |
| DAPA-HF ( | 4,744 patients with HFrEF, NT-proBNP≥600 pg/mL | 18.2 months | Worsening HF | |
| DAPA-CKD ( | 4,304 patients with eGFR 25 to 75 mL/min/1.73 m2and UACR 200 to 5,000 mg/g | 2.4 years | A sustained decline in the eGFR of at least 50%, ESKD | |
| Ertugliflozin | VERTIS-CV ( | 8,246 T2DM patients with ASCVD and eGFR≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 3.5 years | MACE |
| Sotagliflozin | SOLOIST-WHF ( | 1,222 T2DM patients were hospitalized due to the presence of signs and symptoms of HF and were treated with intravenous diuretic therapy and eGFR≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 9.0 months | The first occurrence of CVD-related death causes or hospitalization for HF 0.67 (0.52–0.85), |
| SCORED ( | 10,584 T2DM patients with eGFR of 25 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and risk factors for cardiovascular disease | 16 months | MACE |
Death from CVD causes, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke;
eGFR of 30 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m
Dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained eGFR of < 15 mL/min/1.73 m
Death from CVD causes, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke;
CVD death, MI, or ischemic stroke;
Hospitalization or an urgent visit resulting in intravenous therapy for HF;
Maintenance dialysis for ≥28 days, kidney transplantation, or an eGFR of <15 mL/min/1.73 m
Death from CVD causes, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke;
Death from CVD causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.
ASCVD, Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CI, Confidence interval; CKD, Chronic kidney disease; CVD, Cardiovascular disease; EF, Ejection fraction; eGFR, Estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESKD End stage kidney disease; HFrEF, Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HR, Hazard ratio; MACE, Major adverse cardiac events; MI, Myocardial infarction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; T2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; UACR, Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio.
Figure 1Potential SGLT2 inhibitors-related targets. (A) Venn diagram showing that 146 targets were common to CKD, HF, SGLT2, and T2DM; (B) Interaction network to indicate drugs-targets composited of SGLT2 inhibitors (blue) and 146 targets (pink).
Figure 2PPI network. (A) Top 10 key targets in the PPI network obtained by the Cytohubba; (B–G) The results of the MCODE plug-in clustering analysis.
Cluster details based on MCODE plug-in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAPK14, PIK3CG, MAPK1, HSPA5, DPP4, BRAF, FGFR1, MMP9, JAK2, ABL1, MAPK3, MTOR, MAPK10, NRAS, MAP2K1, LCK, MAPK11, GAPDH, PDGFRB | 11.111 | 19 | 100 |
| 2 | CYP1A1, UGT1A1, MMP1, ABCC2, MMP3, CYP2D6, VCAM1, MET, CYP1A2, ICAM1, CYP3A4, AGTR1, GSTM1, MMP7, UGT1A8, UGT2B7, MMP2, SELE, ADAM17, CYP2A6, CCNB1, CYP2C9, LGALS3, SLCO1B1, ABCG2, ABCB1, GSTP1, MAPK8 | 10.667 | 28 | 144 |
| 3 | FLT4, NGFR, SRC, NTRK1, DNMT1, EGFR, PDGFRA, CDK1, AURKA, CA9, CHEK1, CTSK, ITGB2, SLC2A1, CDK2, SYK, CCNE1, MMP8 | 5.294 | 18 | 45 |
| 4 | HK2, HTR2A, TRPV1, ALB, HSPA8, MMP13, AKR1B1, PRKDC, CDK9, LRRK2, CTSL | 3.4 | 11 | 17 |
| 5 | PYGM, HK1, PYGL | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 6 | ADORA2B, ADORA2A, ADORA1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Figure 3GO enrichment analysis. (A) GO biological processes of 146 core genes; (B) GO cellular component of 146 core genes; (C) GO molecular function f 146 core genes.
Figure 4KEGG enrichment analysis. (A) The top 20 enriched pathways; (B) Interaction network of 73 targets (blue) and top 20 pathways (pink) to indicate pathways-targets network.
Molecular docking results of SGLT2 inhibitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canagliflozin |
| 24812758 | GAPDH | 1U8F | −11 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | −10 | |||
| NRAS | 5UHV | −8.9 | |||
| MMP9 | 6ESM | −10.3 | |||
| MAPK1 | 6SLG | −8.9 | |||
| Dapagliflozin |
| 9887712 | GAPDH | 1U8F | −8.9 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | −9.3 | |||
| NRAS | 5UHV | −7.5 | |||
| MMP9 | 6ESM | −7.9 | |||
| MAPK1 | 6SLG | −8 | |||
| Empagliflozin |
| 11949646 | GAPDH | 1U8F | −9.7 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | −8.8 | |||
| NRAS | 5UHV | −8 | |||
| MMP9 | 6ESM | −9.1 | |||
| MAPK1 | 6SLG | −8.4 | |||
| Ertugliflozin |
| 44814423 | GAPDH | 1U8F | −9.3 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | −9.8 | |||
| NRAS | 5UHV | −7.8 | |||
| MMP9 | 6ESM | −9.4 | |||
| MAPK1 | 6SLG | −8.3 | |||
| Ipragliflozin |
| 10453870 | GAPDH | 1U8F | −9.9 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | −9.3 | |||
| NRAS | 5UHV | −8.6 | |||
| MMP9 | 6ESM | −9.6 | |||
| MAPK1 | 6SLG | −8.4 | |||
| Sotagliflozin |
| 24831714 | GAPDH | 1U8F | −7.3 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | −7.7 | |||
| NRAS | 5UHV | −7.2 | |||
| MMP9 | 6ESM | −8 | |||
| MAPK1 | 6SLG | −7.8 | |||
| Tofogliflozin |
| 46908929 | GAPDH | 1U8F | −9.7 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | −8.2 | |||
| NRAS | 5UHV | −8 | |||
| MMP9 | 6ESM | −8.5 | |||
| MAPK1 | 6SLG | −8.4 |
Figure 5The top 10 docking results. (A) Dapagliflozin-MAPK3; (B) Ertugliflozin-MMP9; (C) Ipragliflozin-MMP9; (D) Empagliflozin-GAPDH; (E) Tofogliflozin-GAPDH; (F) Ertugliflozin-MAPK3; (G) Ipragliflozin-GAPDH; (H) Canagliflozin-MAPK3; (I) Canagliflozin-MMP9; (J) Canagliflozin-GAPDH. The dashed lines in the graph are hydrogen bonds and the values are bond lengths. The names represent residues in the binding sites.