| Literature DB >> 35677678 |
Daljeet Singh Dhanjal1, Parul Mehra2, Sonali Bhardwaj1, Reena Singh1, Parvarish Sharma3, Eugenie Nepovimova4, Chirag Chopra1, Kamil Kuca4,5.
Abstract
In today's time, nanotechnology is being utilized to develop efficient products in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. The application of nanotechnology in transforming bioactive material into nanoscale products substantially improves their biocompatibility and enhances their effectiveness, even when used in lower quantities. There is a significant global market potential for these nanoparticles because of which research teams around the world are interested in the advancements in nanotechnology. These recent advances have shown that fungi can synthesize metallic nanoparticles via extra- and intracellular mechanisms. Moreover, the chemical and physical properties of novel metallic nanoparticles synthesised by fungi are improved by regulating the surface chemistry, size, and surface morphology of the nanoparticles. Compared to chemical synthesis, the green synthesis of nanoparticles offers a safe and sustainable approach for developing nanoparticles. Biosynthesised nanoparticles can potentially enhance the bioactivities of different cellular fractions, such as plant extracts, fungal extracts, and metabolites. The nanoparticles synthesised by fungi offer a wide range of applications. Recently, the biosynthesis of nanoparticles using fungi has become popular, and various ways are being explored to maximize nanoparticles synthesis. This manuscript reviews the characteristics and applications of the nanoparticles synthesised using the different taxa of fungi. The key focus is given to the applications of these nanoparticles in medicine and cosmetology.Entities:
Keywords: biological application; biosynthesis; fungi; nanoparticles; nanotechnology
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35677678 PMCID: PMC9170235 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S363282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1Basic mechanism flowchart of fungal-based biosynthesis of nanoparticles.
Figure 2Schematic representation of intracellular and extracellular nanoparticle formation by fungi.
Figure 3Diagrammatic illustration of top-down method” and “bottom-up method.
List of Fungal Species Used for Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles
| Species Name | Localization | Substrate(s) | Reaction Conditions | Average Size of NPs | Biological Properties | Nanoparticles | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extracellular | Intracellular | Au-NPs | Ag-NPs | ||||||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Not Reported | 103.57nm | Cytotoxic | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Chloroauric Acid | Fungal culture filtrate | 12±5nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal culture filtrate | Not Reported | Antimicrobial against MRSA and MRSE | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Chloroauric Acid; Silver Nitrate; Tetra-chloroauric acid | Culture Supernatant; Fungal culture filtrate; Culture supernatant and filtrate | 12 nm; Not reported; 17.76 nm, 22.6, and 26 nm | Cytotoxic and Catalytic; Antimicrobial against Multidrug-Resistant | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Cell-Free Filtrate | 0.681 nm | Antibacterial activity against MDR bacterial strains like | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal culture filtrate | 5.5–24.4 nm | Antibacterial activity against MRSA when used in combination and Cytotoxic activity against HCT, HepG2, MCF-7, and Vero cell line | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid; Silver Nitrate | Fungal culture filtrate and Cell-free Extract; Fungal culture filtrate | 10–60 nm; 5–50 nm | Not Reported; Antibacterial against | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Chloroauric Acid | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 8.7–15.6 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate; Chloroauric acid; Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate; Extracellular Filtrate; Fungal Culture Filtrate | 10–18 nm; 10–19 nm; 16.54 nm | Antifungal Activity against | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Chloroauric Acid; Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate; Extracellular Filtrate | 11 ± 5 nm; 2.43–53.5 nm | Anticancer Drug Delivery System; Antibacterial activity against MDR pathogens like | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Chloroauric Acid | Cell-Free Filtrate | 1–100 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid and Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 2–15 nm and 20–50 nm | Anti-parasitic activity | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate; Chloroauric acid | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 100 nm | Antioxidant Activity and Antimicrobial activity against | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 3–21 nm | Anti-parasitic activity | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Crude Extracts | 100 nm | Anticancer activity against HT-29, HUH-7, and MCF-7, wound healing examined on L929 cells, Antibacterial activity against | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 30–70 nm | Antibacterial activity against | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Extract | 22 nm | Antibacterial activity against | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | ✓ | Silver Nitrate; Chloroauric acid | Fungal Culture Filtrate; Culture Supernatant | 10–20 nm; 25–50 nm; 20–30 nm | Not Reported; Antibacterial activity against | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid and Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 18–80 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid; Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 40–45 nm; 10 nm; 20–50 nm | Cytotoxic activity against HeLa and MCF-7 Cell line | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | Chloroauric acid; Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate; Fungal Biomass | 3–20 nm; 20–80 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 5–15 nm | Antibacterial activity against | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid and Silver Nitrate; Chloroauric acid | Fungal Culture Filtrate; Fungal Extract | 11 and 32 nm; 10–200 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Supernatant and Cell-Free Filtrate | 19–84 nm | Antibacterial Activity against | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 5–25 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid; Silver Nitrate | Fungal Cell Filtrates and Live Biomass; Fungal Cell-Free Extract; Fungal Culture Filtrate | 20–80 nm; 6.28–15.12 ± 0.8 nm; 40–50 nm | Cytotoxic Activity against mouse mayo blast cancer C2C12 cells; Antibacterial Activity against | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 2–20 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Cytoplasmic Fluid | 26–63 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Cell Filtrate | 60–80 nm | Antibacterial activity against | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 120–160 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Chloroauric acid | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 15–100 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate and Chloroauric acid | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 23 nm and 37 nm | Anti-proliferative activity, Anti-oxidant activity, and Cytotoxic activity against HCT-116 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Chloroauric Acid | Fungal Biomass | 28–52 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Cell Extract | 9.47 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate | 15.45 ± 7.94 nm | Antifungal Activity against | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Extract; Fungal Cell-Free Extract | 10 nm; 16.07 nm | Photocatalytic Activity; Antibacterial Activity against | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |
| ✓ | ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate and Culture Supernatant | 32.08 nm | Antimicrobial activity against | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate; Chloroauric acid; Silver Nitrate | Fungal Culture Filtrate; Fungal Biomass; Fungal Free Cell Filtrate | 40–60 nm; 26–34 nm; 51.10 nm | Antifungal Activity against | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Cell-Free Water Extract | 1–25 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Cell Filtrate | 1–50 nm | Antibacterial Activity against | ✓ | [ | |||
| ✓ | Silver Nitrate | Fungal Cell-Free Water Filtrate | 13–18 nm | Not Reported | ✓ | [ | |||
Abbreviations: nm, nanometer; MRSA, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MRSE, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis; MDR, Multidrug-Resistant; Au-NPs, Gold Nanoparticles; Ag-NPs, Silver Nanoparticles.
Figure 4Comparative schematic showing the bacterial and fungal mediated nanoparticle synthesis.
Enlist of Fungal Nanoparticles Showing Medical Applications
| Species | Shape | Size (nm) | Nanoparticles | Application | References | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag | Au | Pt | TiO2 | ZnO | AB | AF | AV | AC/CT | DD | ||||
| • | 5–27 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||||||||
| – | 550–650 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||||||||
| • | 62–74 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||||||||
| • | 15–45 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 3–30 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||||||||
| • | 14–645 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 53–69 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| – | 20–80 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 30–40 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 5–10 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 20–50 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 5–40 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 16.5 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||
| • | 10–50 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 5–40 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 60–80 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 25–30 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 60–80 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 30.5 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 32–44 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 10 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • and / | 5–40 | ✓ | ✓ | [ | |||||||||
| • | 25 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | [ | ||||||||
Abbreviations: •, Spherical; /, Rod; Au, Gold; Ag, Silver; Pt, Platinum; TiO2, Titanium Dioxide; ZnO, Zinc Oxide; AB, Anti-bacterial Activity; AF, Anti-fungal Activity; AV, Anti-viral Activity; AC/CT, Anti-cancerous Activity/Cancer Therapy; DD, Drug Delivery.
Figure 5Schematic diagram showing the mechanism of antibacterial activity of functionalized metallic nanoparticles [Image Courtesy: 166. Under CC-BY license].
Figure 6Diverse application of fungal based nanoparticles in the field of biomedicine.