| Literature DB >> 35677629 |
Shreya Ghosh1,2, Anwesha Mukherjee3.
Abstract
The outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has triggered unprecedented challenges and put the whole world in a parlous condition. The impacts of COVID-19 is a matter of grave concern in terms of fatality rate, socio-economical condition, health infrastructure. It is obvious that only pharmaceutical solutions (vaccine) cannot eradicate this pandemic completely, and effective strategies regarding lockdown measures, restricted mobility, emergency services to users-in brief data-driven decision system is of utmost importance. This necessitates an efficient data analytics framework, data infrastructure to store, manage pandemic related information, and distributed computing platform to support such data-driven operations. In the past few decades, Internet of Things-based devices and applications have emerged significantly in various sectors including healthcare and time-critical applications. To be specific, health-sensors help to accumulate health-related parameters at different time-instances of a day, the movement sensors keep track of mobility traces of the user, and helps to assist them in varied conditions. The smartphones are equipped with several such sensors and the ability of low-cost connected sensors to cover large areas makes it the most useful component to combat pandemics such as COVID-19. However, analysing and managing the huge amount of data generated by these sensors is a big challenge. In this paper we have proposed a unified framework which has three major components: (i) Spatial Data Infrastructure to manage, store, analyse and share spatio-temporal information with stakeholders efficiently, (ii) Cloud-Fog-Edge-based hierarchical architecture to support preliminary diagnosis, monitoring patients' mobility, health parameters and activities while they are in quarantine or home-based treatment, and (iii) Assisting users in varied emergency situation leveraging efficient data-driven techniques at low-latency and energy consumption. The mobility data analytics along with SDI is required to interpret the movement dynamics of the region and correlate with COVID-19 hotspots. Further, Cloud-Fog-Edge-based system architecture is required to provision healthcare services efficiently and in timely manner. The proposed framework yields encouraging results in taking decisions based on the COVID-19 context and assisting users effectively by enhancing accuracy of detecting suspected infected people by ∼ 24% and reducing delay by ∼ 55% compared to cloud-only system.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Cloud–Fog–Edge framework; Health data analysis; Health service provisioning
Year: 2022 PMID: 35677629 PMCID: PMC9162382 DOI: 10.1007/s11334-022-00458-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Innov Syst Softw Eng ISSN: 1614-5046
Comparisons of existing works and STROVE framework for COVID-19 pandemic management
| Feature | Related works | STROVE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | [ | [ | ||
| Cloud–fog–edge enabled Framework | ||||
| Spatial data infrastructure | ||||
| Health data analysis | ||||
| Mobility data analysis | ||||
| Real-time spatio temporal data evaluation | ||||
| Energy consumption is considered | ||||
Fig. 1Spatial data infrastructure: basic backbone
Fig. 2Structural model of integrated geospatial information framework in the context of COVID-19 pandemic
Fig. 3Detailed representation of deep learning module
Fig. 4Smart ambulance equipped with BAN and femtolet
Fig. 5Delay in individual’s health status prediction inside ambulance
Comparison of accuracy measure for identifying suspected person and health condition
| Activity | Bayesian model (%) | KNN (%) | DT (%) | SVM (%) | NN (%) | Proposed framework (STROVE) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not infected | 68.8 | 77.3 | 71.05 | 81.52 | 73.09 | 86.02 |
| Contact with infected Person | 73.2 | 82.08 | 74.6 | 84.03 | 79.63 | 87.80 |
| Suspected Person | 71.04 | 78.56 | 70.48 | 81.2 | 75.28 | 85.71 |
| Infected Person | 75.46 | 85.2 | 72.15 | 84.8 | 77.08 | 89.11 |
| Normal Health | 79.08 | 84.23 | 87.8 | 88.02 | 85.1 | 94.26 |
| Abnormal Health Status | 59.08 | 62.16 | 80.61 | 77.50 | 79.61 | 95.83 |
Fig. 6Android app for preliminary health status monitoring
Fig. 7Comparison of execution time of mobility analytics module
Fig. 8Comparison of precision (path prediction) of mobility analytics module
Performance metrics of the proposed mobility analytics module for path prediction with baseline methods
| Metric | Bayesian model | LCSS | Semantic model | Markov model | Neural network model | STROVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (%) | 79.23 | 73.91 | 78.19 | 76.52 | 88.19 | 94.12 |
| Stability (%) | 36.2 | 25.18 | 51.67 | 32.45 | 84.11 | 92.32 |
| Learning cost | Low | Medium | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
| Modelling cost | Medium | Low | Low | Low | High | Low |
Fig. 9Knowledge representation to extract useful information
Fig. 10Simulated scenario of the proposed healthcare framework in iFogSim
Fig. 11End-to-end delay in healthcare framework
Fig. 12Energy consumption of the system