| Literature DB >> 35677368 |
Maryam Mohammadi-Araghi1, Alireza Eslaminejad2, Hossein Karegar-Borzi3,4, Saeideh Mazloomzadeh5, Fatemeh Nejatbakhsh1,6.
Abstract
Background: In traditional Persian medicine, Drimia maritima, with the popular name Squill, has been used to alleviate phlegm dyspnea. Squill has also been shown to have anti-inflammatory and anticholinergic properties. The goal of this research was to see how effective and safe Squill-Oxymel was in treating COPD patients. Method: Forty-two COPD patients were examined for eight weeks in two groups. Patients underwent a 6-minute walk test to assess the treatment's effectiveness at the beginning and conclusion of the intervention. We utilized St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) to evaluate the subjective symptoms of patients in order to measure their quality of life.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35677368 PMCID: PMC9170410 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5024792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Registration, randomization, and patient outcome.
Characteristics of the study population by the groups.
| Variables | Squill-Oxymel group ( | Placebo group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± SD) | 60.00 ± 8.99 | 61.10 ± 7.78 | 0.68 |
| Sex, male, | 18 (47.4%) | 20 (52.6%) | 0.61 |
Comparison of the mean distance in the 6MWT and O2 saturation between Squill-Oxymel and placebo groups.
| Variables | Squill-Oxymel group | Placebo group |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Predistance in the 6MWT | 369.76 ± 117.26 | 410.00 ± 133.33 | 0.199 |
|
| |||
| Pre-O2 saturation at the start of the 6MWT | 86.90 ± 8.64 | 89.95 ± 5.40 | 0.30 |
|
| |||
| Pre-O2 saturation at the end of the 6MWT | 77.00 ± 13.28 | 85.57 ± 9.10 | 0.008 |
M ± SD: mean ± standard deviation.
Comparison of the mean distance in the 6MWT and O2 saturation between Squill-Oxymel and placebo groups.
| Variables | Group | Before M ± SD | After M ± SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance in the 6MWT | Squill-Oxymel | 369.76 ± 117.26 | 387.38 ± 123.53 | 0.011 |
|
| ||||
| O2 saturation at start of the 6MWT | Squill-Oxymel Placebo | 86.90 ± 8.64 | 85.19 ± 11.25 | 0.75 |
|
| ||||
| O2 saturation at end of the 6MWT | Squill-Oxymel Placebo | 77.00 ± 13.28 | 77.86 ± 12.52 | 0.37 |
M ± SD: mean ± standard deviation.
Comparison of the mean score of total and dimensions of St. George's Questionnaire between Squill-Oxymel and placebo groups.
| Variables | Squill-Oxymel group | Placebo group |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-St. George's symptom score | 61.19 ± 22.98 | 42.64 ± 20.55 | 0.009 |
|
| |||
| Pre-St. George's activity score | 61.77 ± 22.32 | 53.97 ± 24.42 | 0.29 |
|
| |||
| Pre-St. George's impact score | 39.06 ± 24.45 | 33.05 ± 22.88 | 0.42 |
|
| |||
| Pre-St. George's total score | 49.65 ± 21.44 | 41.01 ± 21.21 | 0.20 |
M ± SD: mean ± standard deviation.
Comparison of the mean score of total and dimensions of St. George's questionnaire between Squill-Oxymel and placebo groups.
| Variables | Group | Before M ± S— | After M ± S— |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. George symptom score | Squill-Oxymel | 61.19 ± 22.97691 | 56.53 ± 25.04019 | 0.24 |
|
| ||||
| St. George's activity score | Squill-Oxymel | 61.77 ± 22.31835 | 59.52 ± 22.17675 | 0.22 |
|
| ||||
| St. George's impact score | Squill-Oxymel | 39.06 ± 24.44876 | 38.89 ± 24.31328 | 0.95 |
|
| ||||
| St. George's total score | Squill-Oxymel | 49.65 ± 21.43897 | 48.21 ± 21.92016 | 0.55 |
M ± SD: mean ± standard deviation.