| Literature DB >> 35676730 |
Guobin Wang1, Chunyan Jiang1, Junjun Fang1, Zhitao Li1, Hongliu Cai2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the prognostic value of Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) on the mortality of patients with sepsis.Entities:
Keywords: AUC; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Pentraxin-3; Sepsis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35676730 PMCID: PMC9175505 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-04032-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 19.334
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study selection process
Literature search and characteristics of the included studies
| Study, year | Country | Design | Population | Sample size (male) | Age, year | Follow-up, day | Outcome | Variables in the multivariate model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muller, 2001 | Switzerland | Prospective cohort study | critically ill patients (SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock) | 101 | – | – | OR, AUC | Univariate |
| Wagenaar, 2009 | Indonesia | Prospective cohort study | severe leptospirosis | 52 (37) | 45 (32–55) | 14 | OR, AUC | Univariate |
| Mauri, 2010 | Italy | Prospective cohort study | severe sepsis and septic shock | 90 (56) | 61 ± 15 | 90 | PTX3 level, AUC | Univariate |
| Huttunen, 2011 | Finland | Prospective cohort study | bacteremia | 132 (70) | 62 (18–93) | 30 | OR, PTX3 level | Univariate |
| Bastrup-Birk, 2013 | Denmark | Prospective cohort study | systemic inflammatory response syndrome | 261 (139) | 63 (18–88) | 873 | HR | Multivariate: age, gender |
| Lin, 2013 | China | Prospective cohort study | ventilator-associated pneumonia | 136 (80) | 65 ± 3 | 28 | HR, PTX3 level, AUC | Multivariate: age, history of COPD, SOFA score, PO2/FiO2, creatinine |
| Uusitalo-Seppa¨la¨, 2013 | Finland | Prospective cohort study | suspected infection | 537 (310) | 64 (18–100) | 365 | OR, PTX3 level, AUC | ICU stay, hypotension, use of vasopressors, disseminated intravascular coagulation, decreased Glasgow Coma Scale, Sepsis + organ dysfunction, multi-organ failure |
| Hansen, 2016 | Denmark | Prospective cohort study | necrotizing soft tissue infections | 135 (84) | 61 (52–69) | 510 | HR, AUC | Multivariate: age, sex, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and chronic disease |
| Fan, 2017 | Taiwan, China | Case–control study | acute decompensated cirrhotic patients | 108 (71) | 57.6 ± 11 | 90 | HR | Multivariate: no parameters provided |
| Jie, 2017 | China | Prospective cohort study | ICU septic shock | 112 (55) | 58.9 ± 13.9 | 28 | HR, PTX3 level | Multivariate: no parameters provided |
| Kim, 2017 | Korea | Prospective cohort study | severe sepsis | 83 (47) | 71 (64–77) | 28 | HR, PTX3 level, AUC | Univariate |
| Albert Vega, 2018 | France | Case control study | septic shock | 30 (21) | 65 (19–86) | 10 | PTX3 level | Univariate |
| Hu, 2018 | China | Prospective cohort study | sepsis and septic shock | 141 (86) | 64 (33–78) | 28 | HR, PTX3 level, AUC | Multivariate: no parameters provided |
| Hansen, 2020 | Denmark | Prospective cohort study | ICU patients | 547 (282) | 66 (57–75) | 28 | HR, PTX3 level, AUC | Multivariate: age, sex, chronic disease and immunosuppression |
| Martin, 2020 | Spain | Prospective cohort study | ICU septic shock | 75 (53) | 64 (49–74) | – | OR, PTX3 level, AUC | Multivariate: age, sex, and immunosuppression |
| Song, 2020 | Korea | Prospective cohort study | sepsis and septic shock | 160 (90) | 77 (67–83) | 28 | HR, PTX3 level, AUC | Multivariate: age, positive blood culture, CRP, septic shock |
| Vassalli, 2020 | Italy | Retrospective cohort study | septic patients | 958 | – | 90 | HR | Multivariate: troponin T, NT-proBNP, treatment |
NOS criteria for quality of cohort studies
| Study | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at the start of the study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | Total quality scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muller, 2001 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | – | – | 6 |
| Wagenaar, 2009 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Mauri, 2010 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Huttunen, 2011 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 9 |
| Bastrup-Birk, 2013 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Lin, 2013 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 9 |
| Uusitalo-Seppa¨la¨, 2013 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Hansen, 2016 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 9 |
| Jie, 2017 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Kim, 2017 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Hu, 2018 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Hansen, 2020 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Martin, 2020 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | – | – | 6 |
| Song, 2020 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
| Vassalli, 2020 | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 8 |
NOS criteria for quality of case–control studies
| Study | Is the case definition adequate? | Representativeness of the cases | Selection of controls | Definition of controls | Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis | Ascertainment of intervention | The same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | Non-response rate | Total quality scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fan, 2017 | ☆ | ☆ | – | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | – | 6 |
| Albert Vega, 2018 | ☆ | ☆ | – | ☆ | – | ☆ | ☆ | – | 5 |
Fig. 2Forest plot of the levels of Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) between non-survivors and survivors in patients with sepsis
Fig. 3Forest plot of the association between Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) and mortality in patients with sepsis
Fig. 4Forest plot of the predictive performance of Pentraxin-3 (PTX3) for mortality in patients with sepsis
Fig. 5Linear regression of analyses of SMD, log HR, and AUC with the proportions of males and sample size in the included studies. A Linear regression of SMD sample size. B Linear regression of SMD by male proportion. C Linear regression of Log HR by sample size. D Linear regression of Log HR by male proportion. E Linear regression of AUC by sample size. F Linear regression of AUC by male proportion
Fig. 6Sensitivity analyses. A Sensitivity analysis of SMD. B Sensitivity analysis of HR. C Sensitivity analysis of AUC
Fig. 7A Funnel plot of the standard error of SMD by SMD. B Filled funnel plot of the standard error of SMD by SMD
Fig. 8A Funnel plot of the standard error of log HR by log HR. B Filled funnel plot of the standard error of log HR by log HR
Fig. 9Funnel plot of the standard error of log AUC by log AUC