| Literature DB >> 35676703 |
Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández1,2, Víctor Manuel Vega Benítez3,4, Marta Pavcovich Ruiz3,5, Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics of patients diagnosed with metaplastic carcinoma of the breast with squamous differentiation and to identify the particular clinical and histological characteristics that need to be taken into account in this type of tumors. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Metaplastic carcinoma; Squamous carcinoma; Survival
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35676703 PMCID: PMC9178843 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02656-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 3.253
Fig. 1Case Nº1. Mammography study mid-lateral projection. A Diagnosis: large area of fibrocystic changes in the external upper quadrant of the breast (metallic marker); a 4-cm diameter mass in the armpit. B Evaluation of the response to chemotherapy: metallic markers fail to define underlying nodular lesion. Axillary progression with an important tumor mass of 10 cm
Fig. 2Case Nº1. surgery. A Ulcerated axillary tumoral mass of 12 cm. B Skin-sparing mastectomy and wide tumor resection, although leaving an irresectable tumor residue, which infiltrated the axillary vein, latissimus dorsi and right brachial plexus. C Macroscopic study of the surgical specimen: large ulcerated axillary tumor (12 × 10 cm), grayish-whitish in color with multiple necrotic and friable reddish areas, deep margin extensively involved. Dense breast parenchyma with multiple cysts; in the upper region, two adjacent zones of greater density of 3 and 2 cm that include metallic filament, free margins. D Close rotation myocutaneous flap of the latissimus dorsi
Fig. 3Case Nº2. Breast ultrasound study. A Hypoechoic solid nodule with internal microcalcifications; approximately 33 mm maximum diameter (BI-RADS V). B Diffuse microcalcifications of 2 cm size, the rest without alterations
Reported single cases of Metaplastic carcinoma with squamous differentiation of the breast (n=10)
| 1 | Graziano et al, 2015 [ | 59 | No | Large mass | Negative | Solid/Cystic mass. No mic | CNB | R0 | Neoadjuvant | NR | Triple negative | No | NR |
| 2 | Jagtap et al, 2015 [ | 45 | Nipple retraction | Two Masses 9, 3 | Negative | High density masses | Surgical specimen | R0 | NR | NR | ER,PR negative Her 2 positive | No | NR |
| 3 | Nguyen et al, 2015 [ | 47 | No | 4 | Positive | NR | Surgical specimen | R0 | Adyuvant | Yes | ER positive PR, Her 2 negative | Lung and brain | NR |
| 4 | Arafah et al, 2016 [ | 73 | No | Mic | Negative | Extensive calcifications | CNB | R0 | No | No | Triple negative | No | 11 years Pure insitu variant |
| 5 | Punzo et al, 2017 [ | 75 | Inflamed cystic lesion | 5 | Negative | Solid/Cystic mass. Mic | Surgical specimen | R0 | Patient refused | No | Triple negative p:63 positive | No | 12 |
| 6 | Chahdi et al, 2018 [ | 44 | Cyst lesion | 5 | Positive | Solid/Cystic mass. Abscess | CNB | R0 | Adyuvant | Yes | Triple negative | No | 9 |
| 7 | Goto et al, 2018 [ | 42 | No | Large mass T4 | Positive | Solid mass | Surgical specimen | R1 | Adyuvant | Yes | Triple negative | No | 17 |
| 8 | Hardy et al, 2019 [ | 44 | No | 11 | Negative | Solid necrotic mass | Surgical specimen | R1 | Patient refused | No | Triple negativep:63 positive | No | NR |
| 9 | Current case 1 | 39 | Fibrocystic disease | 5 | Positive | Solid/Cystic mass | Surgical specimen | R1 | Neoadjuvant | Yes | Triple negativep:63 positive | Lungs and liver | 11 |
| 10 | Current case 2 | 57 | No | 8 | Positive | Solid mass. Mic | CNB | No | Neoadjuvant | Yes | Triple negative | Liver | 19 |
PL preexistent lesions, LNS Lymph node status, CT Chemotherapy, RT Radiotherapy, IC Immunohistochemical characteristics, Mic microcalcifications, CNB Core needle biopsy, R0 Complete resection, R1 Incomplete resection, NR Not reported, ER Estrogen receptor, PR Progesterone receptor