Literature DB >> 35676495

Covariance between nonrelatives in maize.

Rex Bernardo1.   

Abstract

The covariance between relatives is a tenet in quantitative genetics, but the covariance between nonrelatives in crops has not been studied. My objective was to determine if a covariance between nonrelatives is present in maize (Zea mays L.). The germplasm comprised 272 maize lines that were previously genotyped with 28,626 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Pairs of unrelated lines were identified on the basis of their membership probabilities in five subpopulations. The covariance between nonrelatives was assessed as the regression of phenotypic similarity on SNP similarity between unrelated lines. Out of 77 regressions, seven were significant at a 5% false discovery rate: anthesis and silking dates in unrelated B73 and Oh43 lines; plant height and ear height in unrelated Oh43 and PH207 lines; oil in unrelated A321 and Mo17 lines; starch in unrelated B73 and PH207 lines; and protein in unrelated B73 and Mo17 lines. The latter covariance was negative, and this negative covariance between nonrelatives was attributed to the subpopulations having different linkage phases between the markers and underlying causal variants. Overall, the results indicated that a covariance between nonrelatives in maize is not ubiquitous but is sometimes present for specific traits and for certain groups of unrelated individuals. I propose that the covariance between nonrelatives and the covariance between relatives be combined into a generalized covariance between individuals, thus giving a unified framework for expressing the resemblance regardless of the degree of relatedness.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35676495      PMCID: PMC9411190          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-022-00548-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.832


  17 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Estimating genetic correlations in natural populations.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Matsuoka; Yves Vigouroux; Major M Goodman; Jesus Sanchez G; Edward Buckler; John Doebley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; Gael Pressoir; William H Briggs; Irie Vroh Bi; Masanori Yamasaki; John F Doebley; Michael D McMullen; Brandon S Gaut; Dahlia M Nielsen; James B Holland; Stephen Kresovich; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-12-25       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize.

Authors:  R Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Phenotypic covariance across the entire spectrum of relatedness for 86 billion pairs of individuals.

Authors:  Kathryn E Kemper; Loic Yengo; Zhili Zheng; Abdel Abdellaoui; Matthew C Keller; Michael E Goddard; Naomi R Wray; Jian Yang; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Ana I Vazquez; Rohan Fernando; Yann C Klimentidis; Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Reinventing quantitative genetics for plant breeding: something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE.

Authors:  Rex Bernardo
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.