Literature DB >> 3567606

Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language.

H J Neville, D Lawson.   

Abstract

We employed event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and measures of signal detectability to compare attention to peripheral and central visual stimuli in normal hearing subjects who were born to deaf parents (HD Ss) and whose first language was American Sign Language (ASL). The results were compared with those obtained from normal hearing Ss and congenitally deaf Ss in the same paradigm. Task performance and ERPs during attention to the foveal region were similar in the 3 groups. In contrast, with attention to the peripheral stimuli the deaf Ss displayed attention effects over the occipital regions of both hemispheres that were several times larger than those in the hearing and the HD Ss. However, both HD and deaf Ss displayed lateral asymmetries in behavior and ERPs that were opposite in direction to those of the hearing Ss. Whereas hearing Ss detected the direction of target motion better when it occurred in the left visual field, deaf and HD Ss performed better for right visual field targets. Consistent with these results, the amplitude of the attention-related increases in the ERPs were larger from temporal and parietal regions of the right than the left hemisphere in hearing Ss, but were larger from the left than the right hemisphere in both the HD and the deaf Ss. These results suggest that auditory deprivation and the acquisition of a visual language have marked and different effects on the development of cortical specializations in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3567606     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90297-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  37 in total

1.  The influence of a sensitive period for auditory-visual integration in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Teresa V Mitchell; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Do deaf individuals see better?

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Superior spatial touch: improved haptic orientation processing in deaf individuals.

Authors:  Rick van Dijk; Astrid M L Kappers; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: event-related potential evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Lori B Astheimer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

5.  3D mapping of brain differences in native signing congenitally and prelingually deaf subjects.

Authors:  Natasha Leporé; Patrick Vachon; Franco Lepore; Yi-Yu Chou; Patrice Voss; Caroline C Brun; Agatha D Lee; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Prosodic and narrative processing in American Sign Language: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Aaron J Newman; Ted Supalla; Peter C Hauser; Elissa L Newport; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Functional and structural brain connectivity in congenital deafness.

Authors:  Karolyne Dell Ducas; Antonio Carlos da S Senra Filho; Pedro Henrique Rodrigues Silva; Kaio Felippe Secchinato; Renata Ferranti Leoni; Antonio Carlos Santos
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  D L Horn; R A O Davis; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.