Literature DB >> 35675760

Effect of live yeast supplementation in sow diet during gestation and lactation on sow and piglet fecal microbiota, health, and performance.

Nathalie Le Flocʹh1, Caroline Stéphanie Achard2, Francis Amann Eugenio1, Emmanuelle Apper2, Sylvie Combes3, Hélène Quesnel1.   

Abstract

Feeding probiotics like live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii (SB) in pig diets has been suggested to preserve health and reduce antibiotic use during critical periods like weaning. This study was conducted to determine whether SB added to the diet of sows during the last 2 mo of gestation and the 4 wk of lactation may contribute to support the health and performance of piglets before and after weaning through changes in sow physiology, milk composition, and fecal microbiota. Crossbred sows (n = 45) from parity 1 to 9 were allocated to two dietary treatments: Control (n = 23) and SB (n = 22). Sows in the SB group were fed the same standard gestation and then lactation diet as the Control sows but with the addition of SB at 1 × 109 colony-forming units/kg of feed. Piglets were weaned under challenging conditions consisting of mixing of litters, no pen cleaning, and a 2-h period of nonoptimal temperature exposure. Blood and feces were collected from sows on days 28 and 113 of gestation and days 6 (feces only) and 28 of lactation, and from piglets on days 6 (feces) and 28 of lactation and day 5 after weaning. Colostrum was collected during parturition and milk on day 6 of lactation. Supplementation of sow diets with SB influenced the fecal microbiota of the sows and their piglets. Five days after weaning, the alpha-diversity was lower (P < 0.05) in piglets from SB sows than in piglets from Control sows. Analysis of microbiota with partial least square discriminant analysis discriminated feces from SB sows from that of Control sows at 110 d of gestation (29.4% error rate). Piglet feces could also be discriminated according to the diet of their mother, with a better discrimination early after birth (day 6 of lactation) than after weaning (day 5 postweaning, 3.4% vs. 12.7% error rate). Five days after weaning, piglets had greater white blood cell count, plasma haptoglobin concentration, and oxidative stress than before weaning (P < 0.001). Nevertheless, SB supplementation in sow diets had no effect (P > 0.05) on most of health criteria measured in blood and growth performance of piglets during lactation and the postweaning period. Moreover, dietary supplementation of SB to sows did not elicit any changes (P > 0.05) in their reproductive performance, metabolic and health status, nor in the concentration of immunoglobulins and nutrients in colostrum and milk. In the present experimental conditions, feeding SB to sows influenced sow and piglet microbiota with no consequences on their health and performance.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardiizzm321990 ; colostrum; milk; probiotic; weaning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35675760      PMCID: PMC9387602          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  39 in total

1.  Weaning is associated with an upregulation of expression of inflammatory cytokines in the intestine of piglets.

Authors:  S Pié; J P Lallès; F Blazy; J Laffitte; B Sève; I P Oswald
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Dietary inulin affects the expression of intestinal enterocyte iron transporters, receptors and storage protein and alters the microbiota in the pig intestine.

Authors:  E Tako; R P Glahn; R M Welch; X Lei; K Yasuda; D D Miller
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  Characterization of the bacterial gut microbiota of piglets suffering from new neonatal porcine diarrhoea.

Authors:  Marie Louise Hermann-Bank; Kerstin Skovgaard; Anders Stockmarr; Mikael Lenz Strube; Niels Larsen; Hanne Kongsted; Hans-Christian Ingerslev; Lars Mølbak; Mette Boye
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Swarm: robust and fast clustering method for amplicon-based studies.

Authors:  Frédéric Mahé; Torbjørn Rognes; Christopher Quince; Colomban de Vargas; Micah Dunthorn
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  mixOmics: An R package for 'omics feature selection and multiple data integration.

Authors:  Florian Rohart; Benoît Gautier; Amrit Singh; Kim-Anh Lê Cao
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Effects of age and weaning conditions on blood indicators of oxidative status in pigs.

Authors:  Arnaud Buchet; Catherine Belloc; Mily Leblanc-Maridor; Elodie Merlot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Piglet gut microbial shifts early in life: causes and effects.

Authors:  Robin B Guevarra; Jun Hyung Lee; Sun Hee Lee; Min-Jae Seok; Doo Wan Kim; Bit Na Kang; Timothy J Johnson; Richard E Isaacson; Hyeun Bum Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-14

8.  Maternal milk and fecal microbes guide the spatiotemporal development of mucosa-associated microbiota and barrier function in the porcine neonatal gut.

Authors:  Hongbin Liu; Xiangfang Zeng; Guolong Zhang; Chengli Hou; Ning Li; Haitao Yu; Lijun Shang; Xiaoya Zhang; Paolo Trevisi; Feiyun Yang; Zuohua Liu; Shiyan Qiao
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 9.  Management and Feeding Strategies in Early Life to Increase Piglet Performance and Welfare around Weaning: A Review.

Authors:  Laia Blavi; David Solà-Oriol; Pol Llonch; Sergi López-Vergé; Susana María Martín-Orúe; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Feeding sows resistant starch during gestation and lactation impacts their faecal microbiota and milk composition but shows limited effects on their progeny.

Authors:  Julie Leblois; Sébastien Massart; Hélène Soyeurt; Clément Grelet; Frédéric Dehareng; Martine Schroyen; Bing Li; José Wavreille; Jérôme Bindelle; Nadia Everaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.